Journal of Audiology & Otology

The Korean Audiology Society (대한청각학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sound-Field Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response in Cochlear-Implant Recipients

  • Jarollahi, Farnoush (Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Valadbeigi, Ayub (Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Jalaei, Bahram (Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Maarefvand, Mohammad (Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Zarandy, Masoud Motasaddi (Cochlear Implant Center and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amir Aalam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Haghani, Hamid (Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Shirzhiyan, Zahra (Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2019.08.29
  • Accepted : 2019.11.16
  • Published : 2020.04.20
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Currently limited information is available on speech stimuli processing at the subcortical level in the recipients of cochlear implant (CI). Speech processing in the brainstem level is measured using speech-auditory brainstem response (S-ABR). The purpose of the present study was to measure the S-ABR components in the sound-field presentation in CI recipients, and compare with normal hearing (NH) children. Subjects and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, participants were divided in two groups: patients with CIs; and NH group. The CI group consisted of 20 prelingual hearing impairment children (mean age=8.90±0.79 years), with ipsilateral CIs (right side). The control group consisted of 20 healthy NH children, with comparable age and sex distribution. The S-ABR was evoked by the 40-ms synthesized /da/ syllable stimulus that was indicated in the sound-field presentation. Results: Sound-field S-ABR measured in the CI recipients indicated statistically significant delayed latencies, than in the NH group. In addition, these results demonstrated that the frequency following response peak amplitude was significantly higher in CI recipients, than in the NH counterparts (p<0.05). Finally, the neural phase locking were significantly lower in CI recipients (p<0.05). Conclusions: The findings of sound-field S-ABR demonstrated that CI recipients have neural encoding deficits in temporal and spectral domains at the brainstem level; therefore, the sound-field S-ABR can be considered an efficient clinical procedure to assess the speech process in CI recipients.

Keywords

References

  1. Taitelbaum-Swead R, Fostick L. Audio-visual speech perception in noise: implanted children and young adults versus normal hearing peers. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2017;92:146-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.11.022
  2. Harris MS, Kronenberger WG, Gao S, Hoen HM, Miyamoto RT, Pisoni DB. Verbal short-term memory development and spoken language outcomes in deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2013;34:179-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e318269ce50
  3. Abdelsalam NMS, Afifi PO. Electric auditory brainstem response (E-ABR) in cochlear implant children: effect of age at implantation and duration of implant use. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences 2015;16:145-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejenta.2015.03.001
  4. Russo N, Nicol T, Musacchia G, Kraus N. Brainstem responses to speech syllables. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:2021-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.003
  5. Heman-Ackah SE, Roland JT Jr, Haynes DS, Waltzman SB. Pediatric cochlear implantation: candidacy evaluation, medical and surgical considerations, and expanding criteria. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012;45:41-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2011.08.016
  6. Nada NM, Kolkaila EA, Gabr TA, El-Mahallawi TH. Speech auditory brainstem response audiometry in adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences 2016;17:87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejenta.2016.04.002
  7. Sinha SK, Basavaraj V. Speech evoked auditory brainstem responses: a new tool to study brainstem encoding of speech sounds. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;62:395-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-010-0100-y
  8. Bellier L, Veuillet E, Vesson JF, Bouchet P, Caclin A, Thai-Van H. Speech auditory brainstem response through hearing aid stimulation. Hear Res 2015;325:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.03.004
  9. Tahaei AA, Ashayeri H, Pourbakht A, Kamali M. Speech evoked auditory brainstem response in stuttering. Scientifica 2014;2014. Article ID 328646.
  10. Carter ME. Speech-evoked auditory brainstem response in children with unilateral hearing loss. In: Independent Studies and Capstones (ed. Washington University School of Medicine). St. Louis: Washington University School of Medicine;2013. p.664.
  11. Rocha-Muniz CN, Befi-Lopes DM, Schochat E. Investigation of auditory processing disorder and language impairment using the speechevoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 2012;294:143-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2012.08.008
  12. Elkabariti RH, Khalil LH, Husein R, Talaat HS. Speech evoked auditory brainstem response findings in children with epilepsy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014;78:1277-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.05.010
  13. Gabr TA, Hassaan MR. Speech processing in children with cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79:2028-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.09.002
  14. Akhoun I, Moulin A, Jeanvoine A, Menard M, Buret F, Vollaire C, et al. Speech auditory brainstem response (speech ABR) characteristics depending on recording conditions, and hearing status: an experimental parametric study. J Neurosci Methods 2008;175:196-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.07.026
  15. Hornickel J, Knowles E, Kraus N. Test-retest consistency of speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses in typically-developing children. Hear Res 2012;284:52-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.005
  16. Galbraith GC, Amaya EM, de Rivera JM, Donan NM, Duong MT, Hsu JN, et al. Brain stem evoked response to forward and reversed speech in humans. Neuroreport 2004;15:2057-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200409150-00012
  17. Johnson KL, Nicol TG, Kraus N. Brain stem response to speech: a biological marker of auditory processing. Ear Hear 2005;26:424-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000179687.71662.6e
  18. Song JH, Banai K, Russo NM, Kraus N. On the relationship between speech-and nonspeech-evoked auditory brainstem responses. Audiology and Neurotology 2006;11:233-41. https://doi.org/10.1159/000093058
  19. Kraus N, Banai K. Auditory-processing malleability: focus on language and music. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2007;16:105-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00485.x
  20. Kiang NY, Moxon EC. Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1972;81:714-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348947208100513
  21. Javel E, Viemeister NF. Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107:908-21. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428269
  22. Gama N, Peretz I, Lehmann A. Recording the human brainstem frequency-following-response in the free-field. J Neurosci Methods 2017;280:47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.01.016
  23. Ahadi M, Pourbakht A, Jafari AH, Shirjian Z, Jafarpisheh AS. Gender disparity in subcortical encoding of binaurally presented speech stimuli: an auditory evoked potentials study. Auris Nasus Larynx 2014;41:239-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2013.10.010
  24. Skoe E, Kraus N. Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial. Ear Hear 2010;31:302-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cdb272