DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

성문하 협착 소아 환자에 대한 내시경적 기도 확장 시술 후 치료 실패 위험 요인 분석

Risk Factor Analysis of Endoscopic Dilation Procedure for the Management of Subglottic Stenosis in Pediatric Patients

  • 박민혜 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 최나연 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 송복현 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 정한신 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 손영익 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 정만기 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 이비인후과학교실)
  • Park, Min Hae (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Nayeon (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Song, Bok Hyun (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, Han-Sin (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Son, Young-Ik (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Man Ki (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2020.05.27
  • 심사 : 2020.06.09
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30

초록

Background and Objective Endoscopic airway dilation is the primary treatment for pediatric subglottic stenosis (SGS) due to its feasibility and non-invasiveness. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors for the failure of endoscopic airway dilation in pediatric patients with SGS. Materials and Methods This study reviewed medical records of 38 pediatric patients had endoscopic dilation from a single and tertiary referral center, retrospectively. The success of the endoscopic dilation procedure was defined as no dyspneic symptom without tracheostomy or laryngotracheal reconstruction. Demographic profiles, underlying disease, and Myer-Cotton SGS severity grade were recorded. Success rates and risk factors for the failure of treatment were analyzed. Results The SGS patients with severity grade I was most common. After mean 1.8 numbers of procedures, there were 23 patients (60.5%) in the success group and 15 patients (39.5%) in the failure group. Age, sex, underlying diseases, and SGS severity grade were not significantly different between two groups. In patients who had multiple endoscopic procedures, the failure group showed SGS deteriorated after procedures in 66.7%, compared to 11.1% of the success group. In multivariable analysis, a long-term intubation (≥1 month) was identified as an independent risk factor for failure of endoscopic dilation procedure. Conclusion Although endoscopic dilation procedure is safe and effective for the management, repetitive endoscopic dilation may not give clinical benefit in patient with long-term intubation. Other airway procedures must be considered in those group of patients.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hartnick CJ, Hartley BE, Lacy PD, Liu J, Willging JP, Myer CM 3rd, et al. Surgery for pediatric subglottic stenosis: disease-specific outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001;110(12):1109-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940111001204
  2. Lang M, Brietzke SE. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic balloon dilation of pediatric subglottic stenosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;150(2):174-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813510867
  3. Quesnel AM, Lee GS, Nuss RC, Volk MS, Jones DT, Rahbar R. Minimally invasive endoscopic management of subglottic stenosis in children: success and failure. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75(5):652-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.02.002
  4. Hautefort C, Teissier N, Viala P, Van Den Abbeele T. Balloon dilation laryngoplasty for subglottic stenosis in children: eight years' experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;138(3):235-40. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2011.1439
  5. Myer CM 3rd, O'Connor DM, Cotton RT. Proposed grading system for subglottic stenosis based on endotracheal tube sizes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;103(4 Pt 1):319-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949410300410
  6. Rodriguez H, Cuestas G, Botto H, Cocciaglia A, Nieto M, Zanetta A. Post-intubation subglottic stenosis in children. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of moderate and severe stenosis. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2013;64(5):339-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otorri.2013.03.006
  7. Whigham AS, Howell R, Choi S, Pena M, Zalzal G, Preciado D. Outcomes of balloon dilation in pediatric subglottic stenosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2012;121(7):442-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941212100704
  8. Oh SK, Park KN, Lee SW. Long-term results of endoscopic dilatation for tracheal and subglottic stenosis. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2014;7(4):324-8. https://doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2014.7.4.324
  9. Maresh A, Preciado DA, O'Connell AP, Zalzal GH. A comparative analysis of open surgery vs endoscopic balloon dilation for pediatric subglottic stenosis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140(10):901-5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1742
  10. Avelino M, Maunsell R, Jube Wastowski I. Predicting outcomes of balloon laryngoplasty in children with subglottic stenosis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79(4):532-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.01.022
  11. Benjamin B. Prolonged intubation injuries of the larynx: endoscopic diagnosis, classification, and treatment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2018;127(8):492-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489418790348
  12. Duynstee ML, de Krijger RR, Monnier P, Verwoerd CD, Verwoerd-Verhoef HL. Subglottic stenosis after endolaryngeal intubation in infants and children: result of wound healing processes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002;62(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(01)00545-6
  13. Cakir E, Atabek AA, Calim OF, Uzuner S, AlShadfan L, Yazan H, et al. Post-intubation subglottic stenosis in children: analysis of clinical features and risk factors. Pediatr Int 2020;62(3):386-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.14122
  14. Smith ME, Elstad M. Mitomycin C and the endoscopic treatment of laryngotracheal stenosis: are two applications better than one?. Laryngoscope 2009;119(2):272-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20056
  15. Warner D, Brietzke SE. Mitomycin C and airway surgery: how well does it work? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138(6):700-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.02.011