DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Analysis of Elementary School Computing Achievement Standards in the U.S. and Korea

  • Kim, Kapsu (Dept. of Computer Education, Seoul National University of Education) ;
  • Min, Meekyung (Dept. of Computer Science, Seokyeong University) ;
  • Rho, Jungkyu (Dept. of Computer Science, Seokyeong University)
  • Received : 2020.05.03
  • Accepted : 2020.05.11
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

ACM's CSTA has drafted standards for computing curricula and recommended them to schools in the United States. The five core concepts of the US elementary school computing curriculum are computing systems, network and the Internet, data and analysis, algorithms and programming, and impacts of computing. In 2005, Korea prepared ICT education guidelines, including five fields, their subfields, and achievement criteria for each subfield. In the 2015 revised curriculum, software education was introduced and five achievement standards were set. The ACM CSTA has 18 achievement criteria up to K-2 and 21 achievement criteria up to K-5. If we compare the 39 achievement standards of the US to Korea, Korea's 2005 ICT education guidelines include 25 of these, and the 2015 revised curriculum includes 5 of them. In this study, we aim to study the CSTA achievement criteria that second graders should know and the achievement criteria that fifth graders should know. This is compared and analyzed with Korea's 2005 ICT Guidelines and 2015 Software Curriculum. In comparison with the number of achievement standards, the US elementary school's computing achievement standards are much higher than in Korea. Comparing with each standard, there are many areas that are not covered in Korean curriculum, and we can see that the 2015 curriculum has rather receded from 2005.

Keywords

References

  1. CSTA Standards Task Force, A Model Curriculum for K-12 Computer Science: Final Report of the ACM K-12 Task Force Curriculum Committee, ACM CSTA, 2002.
  2. CSTA Standards Task Force, CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards: Revised 2011, ACM CSTA, 2011.
  3. CSTA Standards Task Force, CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards: Revised 2016, ACM CSTA, 2016.
  4. CSTA Standards Task Force, CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards: Revised 2017, ACM CSTA, 2017.
  5. ISTE Standards for Students, Redefining Learning in a Technology-Driven World, ISTE Report, 2016.
  6. MOE, Guidelines for Operations of Information and Communication Technology Education Guidelines in elementary and secondary schools, MOE, Korea, 2000.
  7. MOE, Guidelines for Operations of Information and Communication Technology Education Guidelines in elementary and secondary schools, MOE, Korea, 2005.
  8. MOE, Revised National Curriculum 2015-74, MOE, Korea, 2015.
  9. MOE, The revised national curriculum 2015 for Primary and Secondary Schools, Vol. 2015-75, No. 10, MOE, Korea, 2015.
  10. Kapsu Kim, "A Study on ICT Competences of Korean Students Focus on PISA 2009 and 2012", Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 233-242, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.2.233.
  11. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2015 Technical Report, OECD publishing, Paris, 2016.
  12. Hye-Sook Kim, Han-Sung Kim, Jin-Sook Kim, and An-Na Shin, “Trend Analysis of ICT Accessibility and Utilization Levels of Korean Students based on OECD PISA Data,” Information Policy, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 17-43, 2017.
  13. Kapsu Kim and Meekyung Min, "Comparative Analysis of ICT Accessibility and Usability of Korean Students," International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.73-80, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7236/IJIBC.2020.12.1.73.
  14. Kapsu Kim, “An Analysis of Software Curriculum of Korean Elementary Teacher Education School,” Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 723-732, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.6.723.
  15. Kapsu Kim and Meekyung Min, “A Study on ICT Competency of Preliminary Teachers Based on PISA 2015 Data,” Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 239-249, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.2.239.
  16. Woochun Jun, “A Study on Privacy Issues and Solutions of Public Data in Education,” International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 137-143, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7236/IJIBC.2020.12.1.137.