DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comprehensive Review on r-Learning: Authentic r-Learning Beyond the Fad of New Educational Technology

  • Jung, Sung Eun (Department of Teaching, Learning, and Sociocultural Studies, The University of Arizona) ;
  • Han, Jeonghye (Department of Computer Education, Cheong Ju National University of Education)
  • Received : 2020.03.18
  • Accepted : 2020.03.28
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

We conducted a comprehensive review on the previous research on r-Learning. By reviewing 843 previous studies about r-Learning published from 2004 to 2015, this study investigated 1) the trend of research on r-Learning over time, 2) the characteristics of targeted students in r-Learning, 3) the educational activities implemented for r-Learning, and 4) the types of educational robots used for r-Learning. The study found that the research on r-Learning has rapidly and steadily increased and the types of educational activities and educational robots has been diversified. Relying on the findings of this review, this study suggests 1) ensuring growth in both the quality and the quantity of research on r-Learning, 2) broadening the target student population of r-Learning beyond the age-limited boundaries, 3) enhancing educational activities of r-Learning, and 4) recognizing the necessity for systematic and clear concepts of types of educational robots.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Lee and Y. Seo, "Design and Development of a Monitoring System based on Smart Device for Service Robot Applications, International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication Vol. 10, No. 3, 35-41, 2018, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7236/IJIBC.2018.10.3.35
  2. M.A. Goodrich and A.C. Schultz, “Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey,” Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 203-275, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000005
  3. J. Han, Robot-aided Learning and R-learning Services. Rijeka: InTech, pp. 288-307, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/8143
  4. I. Park and J. Han, "Teachers 'Views on the Use of Robots and Cloud Service in Education for Sustainable Development," Cluster Computing, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-016-0558-9
  5. F.B.V. Benitti, “Exploring the Educational Potential of Robotics in Schools: A Systematic Review,” Computers & Education, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 978-988, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
  6. V. Stuikys and R. Burbaite, Smart Devices and Educational Robotics as Technology for STEM Knowledge, Springer, pp. 53-7, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78485-4_3
  7. M.U. Bers, Coding As a Playground: Programming and Computational Thinking in the Early Childhood Classroom. Routledge, pp. 113-181, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315398945-10
  8. O. Mubin, C.J. Stevens, S. Shahid, A. A. Mahmud, and J.J. Dong, "A Review of the Applicability of Robots in Education," Journal of Technology in Education and Learning, pp. 1-7, June 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2316/journal.209.2013.1.209-0015
  9. M. Prensky, "Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants," One the Horizon, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp.1-6, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
  10. D. Tochacek, J. Lapes, and V. Fuglik, "Developing Technological Knowledge and Programming Skills of Secondary Schools Students Through the Educational Robotics Projects," Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. pp. 377-381, February 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.107
  11. S.E. Jung and E.S. Won, “Systematic Review of Research Trends in Robotics Education for Young Children,” Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 1-24, March 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040905
  12. L, Xia and B, Zhong, "A Systematic Review on Teaching and Learning Robotics Content Knowledge in K-12," Journal of Computers & Education, Vol, 127, pp. 267-282, December 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.007
  13. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D.G. Altman, "Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 151, No. 4, 264-269, August 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  14. J. Johnson, "Children, Robotics, and Dducation," Artificial Life and Robotics, Vol. 7, No. 1-2, pp. 16-21. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02480880
  15. D. Alimisis, "Educational Robotics: Open Questions and New Challenges," Themes in Science and Technology Education. Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 63-71, June 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/mipro.2015.7160399
  16. K. Pitti, B. Curto, V. Moreno, and M.J. Rodriguez, "Resources and Features of Robotics Learning Environments." Proc. 1st International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 315-322, Nov. 14, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2536536.2536584
  17. C. Kim, D. Kim, J. Yuan, R. B. Hill, P. Doshi, and C.N. Thai, "Robotics To Promote Elementary Education Pre-Service Teachers' STEM Engagement, Learning, and Teaching," Journal of Computers & Education, Vol. 91, pp. 14-31, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005
  18. S. Ludi, Educational Robotics and Broadening Participation in STEM for Underrepresented Student Groups, IGI Global, pp. 343-361, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0182-6.ch017
  19. NGSS Lead States, Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States, The National Academies Press. pp. 382-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17253/swueri.2015.64..004
  20. E. Kaya, A. Newley, H. Deniz, E. Yesilyurt, and P. Newley, "Introducing Engineering Design to a Science Teaching Methods Course Through Educational Robotics and Exploring Changes in Views of Preservice Elementary Teachers," Journal of College Science Teaching. Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 66-75, November 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_047_02_66