Korean Journal of Radiology

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perceived Dark Rim Artifact in First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Due to Visual Illusion

  • Taehoon Shin (Division of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Krishna S. Nayak (Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California)
  • Received : 2019.06.21
  • Accepted : 2019.11.25
  • Published : 2020.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate that human visual illusion can contribute to sub-endocardial dark rim artifact in contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance images. Materials and Methods: Numerical phantoms were generated to simulate the first-passage of contrast agent in the heart, and rendered in conventional gray scale as well as in color scale with reduced luminance variation. Cardiac perfusion images were acquired from two healthy volunteers, and were displayed by the same gray and color scales used in the numerical study. Before and after k-space windowing, the left ventricle (LV)-myocardium boarders were analyzed visually and quantitatively through intensity profiles perpendicular the boarders. Results: k-space windowing yielded monotonically decreasing signal intensity near the LV-myocardium boarder in the phantom images, as confirmed by negative finite difference values near the board ranging -1.07 to -0.14. However, the dark band still appears, which is perceived by visual illusion. Dark rim is perceived in the in-vivo images after k-space windowing that removed the quantitative signal dip, suggesting that the perceived dark rim is a visual illusion. The perceived dark rim is stronger at peak LV enhancement than the peak myocardial enhancement, due to the larger intensity difference between LV and myocardium. In both numerical phantom and in-vivo images, the illusory dark band is not visible in the color map due to reduced luminance variation. Conclusion: Visual illusion is another potential cause of dark rim artifact in contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI as demonstrated by illusory rim perceived in the absence of quantitative intensity undershoot.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Bosco S. Tjan who used to be a professor in the Psychology Department, University of Southern California, contributed to the manuscript significantly by explaining biological basis for human visual illusion. Very unfortunately however, he could not be listed as a co-author since he passed away by an incident.

References

  1. Gerber BL, Raman SV, Nayak K, Epstein FH, Ferreira P, Axel L, et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: history, theory, and current state of the art. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:18 
  2. Jo Y, Kim J, Park CH, Lee JW, Hur JH, Yang DH, et al. Guideline for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 1: standardized protocol. Korean J Radiol 2019;20:1313-1333  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0398
  3. Lee JW, Hur JH, Yang DH, Lee BY, Im DJ, Hong SJ, et al. Guidelines for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 2: interpretation of cine, flow, and angiography data. Korean J Radiol 2019;20:1477-1490  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0407
  4. Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R, Friedrich MG, Bluemke DA, Biederman RW, et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 2004;110:732-737  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000138106.84335.62
  5. Plein S, Radjenovic A, Ridgway JP, Barmby D, Greenwood JP, Ball SG, et al. Coronary artery disease: myocardial perfusion MR imaging with sensitivity encoding versus conventional angiography. Radiology 2005;235:423-430  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2352040454
  6. Cheng AS, Pegg TJ, Karamitsos TD, Searle N, Jerosch-Herold M, Choudhury RP, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2440-2449  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.028
  7. Meyer C, Strach K, Thomas D, Litt H, Nahle CP, Tiemann K, et al. High-resolution myocardial stress perfusion at 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 2008;18:226-233  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0746-3
  8. Gebker R, Jahnke C, Paetsch I, Kelle S, Schnackenburg B, Fleck E, et al. Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion MR at 3 T in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology 2008;247:57-63  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2471070596
  9. Di Bella EV, Parker DL, Sinusas AJ. On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1295-1299  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20666
  10. Arai AE. Magnetic resonance first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:383-398  https://doi.org/10.1097/00002142-200012000-00007
  11. Plein S, Ryf S, Schwitter J, Radjenovic A, Boesiger P, Kozerke S. Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI accelerated with k-t SENSE. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:777-785  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21381
  12. Storey P, Chen Q, Li W, Edelman RR, Prasad PV. Band artifacts due to bulk motion. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:1028-1036  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10314
  13. Zhao L, Saleno M, Kramer CM, Meyer CM. The contribution of cardiac motion to dark rim artifacts in myocardial perfusion scans. Proceeding of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 18th Annual Meeting;2010 May 1-7; Stockholm, Sweden 
  14. Albert MS, Huang W, Lee JH, Patlak CS, Springer CS Jr. Susceptibility changes following bolus injections. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:700-708  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910290520
  15. Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P, Mohrs OK, Kreitner KF, Thelen M. Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation-prepared TrueFISP. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:641-652  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10209
  16. Ferreira P, Gatehouse P, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Wage R, Firmin D. Measurement of myocardial frequency offsets during first pass of a gadolinium-based contrast agent in perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:860-870  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21723
  17. Rodieck RW, Stone J. Analysis of receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 1965;28:833-849  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1965.28.5.833
  18. Fiorentini A. Mach band phenomena. In: Alpern M, Aulhorn E, Barlow HB, Baumgardt E, Blackwell HR, Blough DS, et al., eds. Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII-4. Berlin: Springer, 1972:188-201 
  19. Pessoa L. Mach bands: how many models are possible? Recent experimental findings and modeling attempts. Vision Res 1996;36:3205-3227  https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00341-X
  20. Pease PL. On color mach bands. Vision Res 1978;18:751-755  https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(78)90156-6
  21. Ferreira P, Gatehouse P, Kellman P, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Firmin D. Variability of myocardial perfusion dark rim Gibbs artifacts due to sub-pixel shifts. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;11:17 
  22. Strickland RN, Kim CS, McDonnell WF. Luminance, hue, and saturation processing of digital color images. SPIE conference on applications of digital image processing;1986 August 17; San Diego, CA, USA 
  23. Kellman P, Epstein FH, McVeigh ER. Adaptive sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE). Magn Reson Med 2001;45:846-852  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1113
  24. Williams D, Sekiguchi N, Brainard D. Color, contrast sensitivity, and the cone mosaic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:9770-9777  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.21.9770
  25. Palmer SE. Vision science: photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999