과제정보
The authors thank the Division of Statistics of the Medical Research Collaborating Center at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital for the statistical analyses.
참고문헌
- Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239:341-350 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2391041676
- Shiina T. JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: basics and terminology. J Med Ultrason 2013;40:309-323 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-013-0490-z
- Barr RG. Elastography in clinical practice. Radiol Clin North Am 2014;52:1145-1162 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2014.07.002
- Kim DW, Suh CH, Kim KW, Pyo J, Park C, Jung SC. Technical performance of two-dimensional shear wave elastography for measuring liver stiffness: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Korean J Radiol 2019;20:880-893 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0812
- Yoon H, Shin HJ, Kim MJ, Lee MJ. Quantitative imaging in pediatric hepatobiliary disease. Korean J Radiol 2019;20:1342-1357 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0002
- Yun SJ, Jin W, Cho NS, Ryu KN, Yoon YC, Cha JG, et al. Shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons in patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a prospective case-control study. Korean J Radiol 2019;20:1176-1185 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0918
- Ricci P, Maggini E, Mancuso E, Lodise P, Cantisani V, Catalano C. Clinical application of breast elastography: state of the art. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:429-437 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.007
- Gong X, Xu Q, Xu Z, Xiong P, Yan W, Chen Y. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;130:11-18 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1745-2
- D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA. ACR BI-RADS® atlas: breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston VA: American College of Radiology, 2013
- Garra BS. Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 2007;23:255-268 https://doi.org/10.1097/ruq.0b013e31815b7ed6
- Thomas A, Degenhardt F, Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Slowinski T, Fischer T. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. Acad Radiol 2010;17:558-563 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2009.12.006
- Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB 2nd, Svensson WE, Balleyguier C, Smith C. Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31:281-287 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.2.281
- Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, Dwamena BA. Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;134:923-931 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2020-x
- Zhi H, Xiao XY, Ou B, Zhong WJ, Zhao ZZ, Zhao XB, et al. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification? Eur J Radiol 2012;81:3216-3221 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.016
- Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H, Ohlinger R, Grunwald S, Blohmer JU, et al. Real-time elastography--an advanced method of ultrasound: first results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:335-340 https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2823
- Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM, Hesley GK, Sisney GA, Svensson WE, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 2007;245:401-410 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2452061805
- Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ, Morton MJ, Nordland MR, Meixner DD, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging--clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology 2006;238:425-437 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2381041336
- Yoon JH, Kim MH, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim MJ. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:730-736 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4654
- Havre RF, Waage JR, Gilja OH, Odegaard S, Nesje LB. Real-time elastography: strain ratio measurements are influenced by the position of the reference area. Ultraschall Med 2012;33:559-568 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1273247
- Yoon JH, Song MK, Kim EK. Semi-quantitative strain ratio in the differential diagnosis of breast masses: measurements using one region-of-interest. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016;42:1800-1806 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.03.030
- Duda VF, Kohler C. An improved quantification tool for breast ElastoScanTM: E-BreastTM. White Paper. Seoul: Samsung Medison, 2014
- Yoon JH, Song MK, Kim EK. Semi-quantitative strain ratio determined using different measurement methods: comparison of strain ratio values and diagnostic performance using one-versus two-region-of-interest measurement. Ultrasound Med Biol 2017;43:911-917 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.01.005
- Chang JM, Won JK, Lee KB, Park IA, Yi A, Moon WK. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:W347-W356 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10416
- Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Kim SJ. Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography. Radiology 2011;259:59-64 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10101414
- Enderlein G. Fleiss J. L: The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York-Chichester-Brislane-Toronto-Singapore 1986, 432 S., £38.35. Biom J 1988;30:304
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;327:307-310 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
- Fischer T, Peisker U, Fiedor S, Slowinski T, Wedemeyer P, Diekmann F, et al. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio. Ultraschall Med 2012;33:372-379 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1273222
- Stachs A, Hartmann S, Stubert J, Dieterich M, Martin A, Kundt G, et al. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio. Ultraschall Med 2013;34:131-136