DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한강납줄개의 조개유생 보육에 따른 작은말조개 내 산란 특성

Spawning Characteristics of Hangang Bitterling, Rhodeus pseudosericeus (Pisces: Acheilognathinae) in the Host Mussel with Glochidia

  • 김형수 (국립수산과학원 내수면양식연구센터) ;
  • 박종영 (전북대학교 생명과학과)
  • Kim, Hyeong Su (Inland Aquaculture Research, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Park, Jong Young (Department of Biological Science, College of Natural Science, Chonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.06
  • 심사 : 2020.04.20
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30

초록

본 연구는 2017년 4~6월까지 흑천 일대에서 한강납줄개의 조개 유생보육에 따른 작은말조개 내 산란 특성에 관한 연구를 실시하였다. 조사기간 동안 확인된 조개는 327개체이었고, 글로키디아 유생을 보육한 조개 중 한강납줄개의 산란이 확인된 조개는 34개체(14.1%)로 나타났다. 아가미 위치에 따른 글로키디아 유생을 보육한 조개와 보육하지 않은 조개에서 확인된 알과 자어수는 왼쪽 외반새 5.0±3.58개(range, 1~8) vs. 2.8±2.13개 (1~9), 왼쪽 내반새 1.5±0.96개 (1~3) vs. 1.7± 0.82개(1~3), 오른쪽 내반새 1.4±0.51개(1~2) vs. 2.1±1.85개(1~6), 오른쪽 외반새 6.4±4.82개(1~20) vs. 3.0±1.86개(1~6)로 나타났다. 아가미 위치에 따른 글로키디아 유생을 보육한 조개와 보육하지 않은 조개에서 확인된 알과 자어의 출현빈도는 왼쪽 외반새 82.6% vs. 73.4%, 왼쪽 내반새 17.4% vs. 9.4%, 오른쪽 내반새 26.1% vs. 15.6%, 오른쪽 외반새 58.7% vs. 67.2%로 나타났다. 글로키디아 유생을 보육한 조개와 보육하지 않은 조개에서 확인된 알과 자어수는 8.5±6.43개(1~23) vs. 4.5±3.38개(1~14)였다. 한강납줄개 알과 자어수 그리고 출현빈도는 글로키디아 유생을 보육한 조개와 외반새에서 높은 것으로 나타났다.

This study investigated spawning characteristics of Hangang bitterling, Rhodeus pseudosericeus inside the host mussel, Unio douglasiae sinuolatus at the Heukcheon Stream in Korea from April to June 2017. 327 mussels were collected, among them, 34 (14.1%) were spawned mussels of R. pseudosericeus with glochidia. The mean number of R. pseudosericeus embryos with or without glochidia by the mussel gill position was 5.0±3.58 (range, 1~8) vs. 2.8±2.13 (1~9) in the left outer demibranch, 1.5±0.96 (1~3) vs. 1.7±0.82 (1~3) in the left inner demibranch, 1.4±0.51 (1~2) vs. 2.1±1.85 (1~6) in the right inner demibranch, and 6.4±4.82 (1~20) vs. 3.0±1.86 (1~6) in the right outer demibranch. The frequency of R. pseudosericeus embryos with or without glochidia by the mussel gill position was 82.6% vs. 73.4% in the left outer demibranch, 17.4% vs. 9.4% in the left inner demibranch, 26.1% vs. 15.6% in the right inner demibranch, and 58.7% vs. 67.2% in the right outer demibranch. The mean number of R. pseudosericeus embryos with or without glochidia was 8.5±6.43 (1~23) vs. 4.5±3.38 (1~14). The number and frequency of R. pseudosericeus embryos were higher in the mussel with glochidia and the outer demibranchs than those without glochidia and with inner demibranchs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aldridge, D.C. 1997. Reproductive ecology of bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus Pallas) and unionid mussels. PhD dissertation, Cambridge University, UK. pp 10-100.
  2. Aldridge, D.C. 1999. Development of European bitterling in the gills of freshwater mussels. J. Fish Biol., 54: 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb00618.x.
  3. Arai, R., S.R. Jeon and T. Ueda. 2001. Rhodeus pseudosericeus sp. nov., a new bitterling from South Korea (Cyprinidae, Acheilognathinae). Ichthyol. Res., 48: 275-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-001-8146-1.
  4. Back, H.M. and H.B. Song. 2005. Spawning in mussel and adaptation strategy of Acheilognathus signifer(Cyprinidae: Acheilognathinae). Korean J. Ichthyol., 17: 105-111.
  5. Damme, V.D., N. Bogutskaya, R.C. Hoffimann and C. Smith. 2007. The introduction of the European bitterling (Rhodeus amarus) to west and central Europe. Fish Fish., 8: 79-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2679.2007.00239.x.
  6. Dillon, R.T. 2000. The ecology of freshwater mollusks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 509pp.
  7. Haag, W.R. 2013. The role of fecundity and reproductive effort in defining life-history strategies of North American freshwater mussels. Biol. Rev. 88: 745-766. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12028.
  8. Jeon, H.B. and H.Y. Suk. 2014. Pseudo but actually genuine: Rhodeus pseudosericeus provides insight into the phylogeographic history of the amur bitterling. Anim. Cells. Syst., 18: 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2014.936506.
  9. Kanoh, Y. 2000. Reproductive success associated with territoriality, sneaking, and grouping in male rose bitterlings, Rhodeus ocellatus (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Environ. Biol. Fish., 57: 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004585405848.
  10. Kim, C.H., E.J. Kang and J.H. Kim. 2006. Development of eggs and early life history of Korean bitterling, Rhodeus pseudosericeus (Acheilognathinae). Korean J. Ichthyol., 18: 266-272.
  11. Kim, H.S., H. Yang, J.G. Ko and J.Y. Park. 2014. Spawning pattern in the freshwater mussel Lamprotula leai and Unio douglasiae sinuolatus of Acheilognathus signifer(Pisces: Acheilognathinae). Korean J. Ichthyol., 26: 83-88.
  12. Kim, H.S., J.G. Ko, W.S. Choi and J.Y. Park. 2015. Population ecology of Korean rose bitterling, Rhodeus uyekii(Pisces: Acheilognathinae) in the Bongseocheon, Mankyeonggang (river), Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol., 27: 78-85.
  13. Kim, H.S., J.D. Yoon, H. Yang, H.S. Choi and J.H. Lee. 2017. Reproductive characteristics of Rhodeus pseudosericeus (Pisces: Acheilognathinae) in the Heukcheon, Namhangan (River), Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol., 29: 235-243.
  14. Kim, H.S., H.S. Choi and J.Y. Park. 2018. Embryonic development characteristics and host mussel utilization of flat bitterling Acheilognathus rhombeus (Cyprinidae) during winter in Korea. Environ. Biol. Fish., 101: 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-017-0680-4.
  15. Kim, I.S. and J.Y. Park. 2002. Freshwater fishes of Korea. Kyo-Hak Publishing Co. Ltd., Seoul, Korea, 466pp.
  16. Kitamura, J. 2005. Reproductive ecology of the striped bitterling Acheilognathus cyanostigma (Cyprinidae: Acheilognathinae). Ichthyol. Res., 53: 216-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-006-0336-4.
  17. Kitamura, J. 2006a. Seasonal change in the spatial utilization of host mussels in relation to ovipositor length by female rosy bitterling Rhodeus ocellatus kurumeus. J. Fish. Biol., 65: 597-607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2006.00949.x.
  18. Kitamura, J. 2006b. Adaptive spatial utilization of host mussels by the Japanese rosy bitterling Rhodeus ocellatus kurumeus. J. Fish Biol., 69: 263-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01099.x.
  19. Kitamura, J., J.N. Negishi, M. Nishio, S. Sagawa, J.I. Akino and S. Aoki. 2009. Host mussel utilization of the Itasenpara bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis) in the Moo River in Himi, Japan. Ichthyol. Res., 56: 296-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-008-0082-x.
  20. Ko, M.H., R.Y. Myung and H.S. Kim. 2019. Fish community characteristics and habitat aspects of endangered species, Rhodeus pseudosericeus in Heuk stream, a tributary of the Han River drainage system. Korean J. Environ. Ecol., 33: 266-279. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2019.33.3.266.
  21. Kwon, O.K, G.M. Park and J.S. Lee. 1993. Coloured shells of Korea. Academy Publishing Company, Seoul, Korea, 446pp.
  22. Liu, H., Y. Zhu, C. Smith and M. Reichard. 2006. Evidence of host specificity and congruence between phylogenies of bitterling and freshwater mussels. Zool. Stud., 45: 428-434.
  23. Methling, C., K, Douda, H. Liu, R. Rouchet, V. Bartakova, D. Yu, C. Smith and M. Reichard. 2018. Energetic costs in the relationship between bitterling and mussels in East Asia. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond., 125: 750-759. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/bly178.
  24. Mills, S.C. and J.D. Reynolds. 2002a. Mussel ventilation rates as a proximate cue for host selection by bitterling Rhodeus sericeus. Oecologia (Berl), 131: 473-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0895-7.
  25. Mills, S.C. and J.D. Reynolds. 2002b. Host species preferences by bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus, spawning in freshwater mussels and consequences for offspring survival. Anim. Behav., 63: 1029-1036. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1988.
  26. Mills, S.C. and J.D. Reynolds. 2003. The bitterling-mussel interaction as a test case for co-evolution. J. Fish. Biol., 63: 84-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.00209.x.
  27. Park, G.M. and O.K. Kwon. 1993. Seasonal gonadal cycle of the seven species of freshwater unionidaed (Pelecypoda: Unionoida). Korean J. Malacol., 11: 147-163.
  28. Reichard, M., J. Bryja, M. Polacik and C. Smith. 2001. No evidence for host specialization or host-race formation in the European bitterling (Rhoseus amarus), a fish that parasitizes freshwater mussels. Mol. Ecol., 20: 3631-3643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05198.x.
  29. Reichard, M., M. Polacik, A.S. Tarkan, R. Spence, O. Gaygusuz, E. Ercan, O. Ondrackova and C. Smith. 2010. The bitterling-mussel coevolutionary relationship in areas of recent and ancient sympatry. Evolution, 64: 3047-3056. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01032.x.
  30. Schwalb, A.N., Morris, T.J. and K. Cottenie. 2015. Dispersal abilities of riverine freshwater mussels influence metacommunity structure. Freshw. Biol., 60: 911-921. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12544.
  31. Smith, C., J.D. Reynolds, W.J. Sutherland and P. Jurajda. 2000. Adaptive host choice and avoidance of superparasitism in the spawning decisions of bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobio., 48: 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650000212.
  32. Smith, C., K. Rippon, A. Douglas and P. Jurajda. 2001. A proximate cue for oviposition site choice in the bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Freshw. Biol., 46: 903-911. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00725.x.
  33. Smith, C., M. Reichard, P. Jurajda and M. Przybylski. 2004. The reproductive ecology of the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). J. Zool., Lond., 262: 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836903004497.
  34. Spence, R. and C. Smith. 2013. Rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus) embryos parasitize freshwater mussels by competing for nutrients and oxygen. Acta Zool., 94: 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.2011.00532.x.
  35. Song, H.B. and O.K. Kwon. 1994. Spawning of the bitterling, Acheilognathus yamatsutae (Cyprinidae) into the mussel. Korean J. Ichthyol., 6: 39-50.
  36. Suzuki, N. 2006. Egg and larval development of the bitterling Rhodeus pseudosericeus(Cyprinidae). Jpn. J. Ichthyol., 53: 47-54. https://doi.org/10.11369/jji1950.53.47.
  37. Tankersley, R.A. and R.V. Dimock. 1993a. The effect of larval brooding on the respiratory physiology of the freshwater unionid mussel Pyganodon cataracta. Am. Mid. Nat., 130:146-163. https://doi.org/10.2307/2426283.
  38. Tankersley, R.A. and R.V. Dimock. 1993b. Endoscopic visualization of the functional morphology of the ctenidia of the unionid mussel Pyganodon cataracta. Can. J. Zool., 71:811-819. https://doi.org/10.1139/z93-106.