DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Palatability and Yield of Winter Annual Forage Crops under Horse Grazing System in Jeju

제주지역 말 방목체계에서 동계사료작물의 말 기호성 및 생산성

  • 박남건 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 우제훈 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 유지현 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 신상민 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 박형수 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 황원욱 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원)
  • Received : 2020.06.09
  • Accepted : 2020.06.24
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate winter annual forage crops for yield, and horse palatability under horse grazing during the fall and spring in Jeju. The winter annual forage crops such as Italian ryegrass(IRG), rye, and oat were planted in randomized block design in October 30. The horse grazing was initiated on March 17 of the following year. At the first cutting, the dry matter yield of rye was the highest with 4,600 kg/ha compared to the IRG and oat (p<0.05). But there were no significantly different in the yield of winter annual forage crops after the second and third harvests. The total dry matter yield showed rye 12,593 kg/ha, IRG 10,941 kg/ha, and oat 9,424 kg/ha respectively. The horse intake duration of the IRG was significantly higher than the oat and rye (p<0.05). In the first grazing and the second grazing, the intake duration of the IRG was 853.2 seconds and 989.4 seconds, respectively, with oat at 147.6 seconds, and 73.0 seconds, and rye at 89.4 seconds, and 33.18 seconds. The intake duration of IRG was longer than that of oat and rye (p<0.05). The intake rate of the IRG was 60.0% in the first and 82.8% in the second, and the average intake rate was 71.4%. When considering the maintenance of pastures and the palatability of horses, the IRG is the most suitable forage crop in winter annual forage crops in Jeju.

본 연구는 일년생 사료작물인 이탈리안 라이그라스, 귀리, 호밀을 파종하여 말방목 체계하에서 생육특성, 생산성 및 방목지에서의 말의 기호성 등을 조사하기 위해 수행하였다. 일년생 사료 작물은 10월 30일에 파종하였으며 말 방목은 이듬해 3월 17일에 시작하였다. 1차 예취시 건물수량은 호밀이 4,600kg/ha로 이탈리안 라이그라스와 귀리에 비해 높은 수량을 나타내었다(p<0.05). 2차와 3차 예취시 건물수량은 사료작물간에 유의적인 차이를 보이 않았으나 시간이 경과할수록 이탈리안 라이그라스의 수량이 높아져 총 건물수량은 이탈리안 라이그라스가 10,941kg/ha으로 호밀 12,593kg/ha와 귀리 9,424kg/ha와 비슷하였다. 사료작물별 채식시간은 이탈리안 라이그라스가 귀리와 호밀에 비해서 월등히 높았다(p<0.05). 1차 방목과 2차 방목에서 이탈리안 라이그라스의 채식시간은 각각 853.2초, 989.4초였으며, 귀리는 147.6초 73.0초 그리고 호밀은 89.4초, 33.18초였다. 각 사료작물별 채식률은 이탈리안 라이그라스가 귀리와 호밀에 비해 1차와 2차 방목 모두 가장 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 이탈리안 라이그라스의 채식률은 1차에서 60.0%, 2차에서 82.8%였으며, 평균 채식률은 71.4%를 보였다. 일년생 사료작물의 1번초의 수량은 호밀이 가장 높았지만, 작물의 재생능력과 총 생산성, 말의 기호성은 이탈리안 라이그라스가 월등히 우수했다. 이상의 결과를 종합해 보면 제주지역에서 말을 방목하기 위한 동계사료작물의 재배 이용은 이탈리안 라이그라스가 가장 적합하다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen, E., Sheaffer, C. and Martinson, K. 2013. Forage nutritive value and palatability of cool-season grasses under horse grazing. Agronomy Journal. 105(3):679-684. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0300
  2. Ball, D.M., Hoveland, C.S. and Lacefield, G.D. 2015. Southern forages: Modern concepts for forage crop management. International Plant Nutrition Institute, Peachtree Corners, Georgia.
  3. Beck, P.A., Stewart, C.B., Phillips, J.M. and Watkins, K.B. 2007. Effect of species of cool-season annual grass interseeded into Bermudagrass sod on the performance of growing calves. Journal of Animal Science. 85(2):536-544. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-489
  4. Bridges, K.M., Fultz, L.M., Alison, M.W., Han, K.J., Macoon, B. and Pitman, W.D. 2019. Quantifying soil health in a topographically diverse warm-season perennial pasture over-seeded with a mix of cool-season annuals. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 282(5):58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.05.016
  5. Chae, H.S., Kim, N.Y., Woo, J.H., Shin, M.C., Son, J.K., Seong, P.N., Lee, W.S., Kim, S.H., Hwang, K.J., Jin, K.Y. and Park, N.G. 2017. Effect of seed mixture on forage yields and botanical composition at an altitude of 400 m in Jeju island. Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 37(1):19-27. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2017.37.1.19
  6. Choi, G.J., Lim, Y.C., Sung, B.R., Kim, K.Y., Lee, J.K., Lim, K.B., Park, H.S., Seo, S. and Ji, H.C. 2007. A cold-tolerant and early-maturing Italian ryegrass(Lolium multiflorum Lam.) new variety, 'Kospeed'. Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 27(3):145-150. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.3.145
  7. Dillard, S.L., Hancock, D.W., Harmon, D.D., Mullenix, M.K., Beck, P.A. and Soder, K.J. 2018. Animal performance and environment efficiency of cool-and warm-season annual grazing systems. Journal of Animal Science. 96(8):3491-3502. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky025
  8. Grev, A.M., Sheaffer, C.C., DeBoer, M.L., Catalano, D.N. and Martinson, K.L. 2017. Palatability, yield, and forage nutritive value of annual grasses under horse grazing. Agronomy Journal. 109(4):1561-1572. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.11.0684
  9. Heo, H.Y., Park, H.H., Kim, M.J., Choi, S.W., Park, K.G., Nam, J.H., Kim, J.G., Lee, C.K. and Kwon, T.U. 2003. A new cold tolerant, high forage and grain yielding winter oat cultivar "Samhan". Korean Journal of Breeding Science. 35(4):331-332.
  10. Ju, J.I., Lee, J.J., Park, K.H. and Lee, H.B. 2009. Changes of feed quality at different cutting dates among five winter cereals for whole-crop cereal silage in middle region. Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 29(3):187-196. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.3.187
  11. Lee, C.E., Park, N.K., Jin, S.H., Kim, Y.J., Kang, D.H. and Kim, K.I. 2002. Changes in serum vitamin E and trace mineral levels and other blood parameters in growing Thoroughbred horses during the period of pasture grazing and stable feeding. Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 44(6):719-726. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2002.44.6.719
  12. Lee, C.E., Park, N.K., Park, H.S., Oh, W.Y., Ko, M.S., Kim, D.H. and Kang, D.H. 2007. Change in the productivity and the percentage of grasses intake in different mixture grazed by Thoroughbred horses. Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 27(2):123-128. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.2.123
  13. Martinson, K.L., Wells, M.S. and Sheaffer, C.C. 2016. Horse preference, forage yield, and species persistence of 12 perennial cool-season grass mixtures under horse grazing. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 36:19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2015.10.003
  14. McCann, J.S. and Hoveland, C.S. 1991. Equine grazing palatabilitys among winter annual grasses and clovers adapted to the southeastern United States. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 11(5):275-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-0806(06)81314-6
  15. McCormick, J.S., Sulc, R.M., Barker, D.J. and Beuerlein, J.E. 2006. Yield and nutritive value of autumn-seeded winter-hardy and winter-sensitive annual forages. Crop Science. 46(5):1981-1989. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.0140
  16. Mullenix, M.K. and Rouquette Jr, F.M. 2018. Cool-season annual grasses or grass-clover management options for extending the fall-winter-early spring grazing season for beef cattle. In the Professional Animal Scientist. 34(3):231-239. https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2017-01714
  17. Myer, R.O., Blount, A.R., Carter, J.N., Mackowiak, C.L. and Wright, D.L. 2008. Influence of pasture planting method and forage blend on annual cool-season pasture forage availability for grazing by growing beef cattle. In the Professional Animal Scientist. 24(3):239-246. https://doi.org/10.1532/S1080-7446(15)30846-9
  18. Park, H.S., Hwang, K.J., Park, N.G., Choi, G.J., Lee, J.K., Cheon, D.W. and Ko, M.S. 2008. Comparison of forage production and feed value of winter forage crops in Jeju. Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 28(3):215-220. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2008.28.3.215
  19. SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS/STAT user guide; Statics, Version 9.0(7th ed.). SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.