DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Educational Program Evaluation System in a Medical School

일개 의과대학 교육프로그램 평가체제에 대한 연구

  • Yune, So-Jung (Department of Medical Education, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Yeoup (Department of Medical Education, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Im, Sunju (Department of Medical Education, Pusan National University School of Medicine)
  • 윤소정 (부산대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실) ;
  • 이상엽 (부산대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실) ;
  • 임선주 (부산대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실)
  • Received : 2020.04.30
  • Accepted : 2020.06.24
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

A systematic educational program evaluation system for continuous quality improvement in undergraduate medical education is essential. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are two distinct but complementary processes referred to in an evaluation system that emphasizes formative purpose. Monitoring involves regular data collection for tracking process and results, while evaluation requires periodic judgment for improvement. We have recently completed implementing an educational evaluation using the M&E concept in a medical school. The evaluation system consists of two loops, one at the lesson/course level and the other at the phase/graduation level. We conducted evaluation activities in four stages: planning, monitoring, evaluation, and improvement. In the planning phase, we clarified the purpose of evaluation, formulated a plan to engage stakeholders, determined evaluation criteria and indicators, and developed an evaluation plan. Next, during the monitoring phase, we developed evaluation instruments and methods and then collected data. In the evaluation phase, we analyzed results and evaluated the criteria of the two loops. Finally, we reviewed the evaluation results with stakeholders to make improvements. We have recognized several problems including excessive burden, lack of expertise, insufficient consideration of stakeholders' evaluation questions, and inefficient data collection. We need to share the value of evaluation and build a system gradually.

Keywords

References

  1. Scriven M. Evaluation thesaurus. 4th ed. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1991. 53 p.
  2. Goldie J. AMEE education guide no. 29: evaluating educational programmes. Med Teach. 2006;28(3):210-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500271282
  3. Bae HS. Theory-driven educational program evaluation. Seoul: Wonmisa; 2008.
  4. Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: a systemic approach. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2004. 171 p.
  5. Chen HT. Monitoring the progress of a program. In: Chen HT, editor. Practical program evaluation: assessing and improving planning, implementation and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2005. p. 181-8.
  6. Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation. Accreditation Standards of Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation; 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 25]. Available from: https://kimee.or.kr/board/data/?uid=1318&mod=document&pageid=1.
  7. Scriven M. Evaluation thesaurus. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1991. p. 228.
  8. Chelimsky E, Shadish WR. Evaluation for the 21st century: a handbook. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1997.
  9. Kirkpatrick D. Revisiting Kirkpatrick's four-level model. Train Dev. 1996;50(1):54-7.
  10. Frechtling J. Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco (CA): John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  11. Stufflebeam D, Shinkfield A. Evaluation theory, models, & applications. San Francisco (CA): Jossey Bass/John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  12. Frye AW, Hemmer PA. Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e288-99. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637
  13. Stake RE. Evaluating educational programmes: the need and the response. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 1976.
  14. Development Assistance Committee Network on Development Evaluation. Evaluation criteria [Internet]. Paris: Development Assistance Committee Network on Development Evaluation, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 1991 [cited 2020 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/daccriteriaforevaluatingdevelopmentassistance.htm.
  15. Cook DA. Twelve tips for evaluating educational programs. Med Teach. 2010;32(4):296-301. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903480121