Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Perceptual Curiosity on Attitude towards Different Cultures and Intention to Recommend Products from Different Cultures: Focusing on Halal Products

지각적 호기심이 이문화에 대한 태도 및 이문화 제품의 추천의도에 미치는 영향 : 할랄제품을 중심으로

  • 주선희 (건양대학교 글로벌프론티어학과)
  • Received : 2020.03.03
  • Accepted : 2020.06.20
  • Published : 2020.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As foreign tourists visiting Korea increase and Koreans traveling overseas become more frequent, a study on the level of domestic consumers' acceptance of different cultures and the perception towards products from different cultures is needed. In this study, a perceptual curiosity, which is an individual personality, was divided into Diverse perceptual curiosity and Specific perceptual curiosity, and effects of perceptual curiosity on an attitude towards different cultures and an intention to recommend products from different cultures were examined. To prove validity of measurement items and reliability of data, SPSS and LISREL were used and to prove a hypothesis, a structural equation model was used. The study results showed that the Diverse perceptual curiosity, which is Hypothesis 1, had a positive effect on the attitude towards different cultures while the Specific perceptual curiosity, which is Hypothesis 2, did not have a significant effect on the attitude towards different cultures. In addition, it was shown that the attitude towards different cultures, which is Hypothesis 3, had a significant positive effect on the intention to recommend the products from different cultures.

우리나라의 해외방문객이 증가하고 우리나라 국민들의 해외 방문이 빈번해짐에 따라 국내 소비자들의 이문화에 대한 수용정도와 이문화제품에 대한 인식에 대한 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구는 개인성향인 지각적 호기심을 포괄적 지각 호기심과 세부적 지각호기심으로 구분하여 지각적 호기심이 이문화에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향과 이문화제품에 대한 추천의도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 개념 및 측정항목의 타당성과 데이터의 신뢰성을 검증을 위해 SPSS, LISREL을 이용하였으며, 구조방정식모델을 통해 가설을 검증하였다. 연구결과, 가설1인 포괄적 지각호기심은 이문화에 대한 태도에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나, 가설2인 세부적 지각호기심은 이문화에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향이 유의하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 가설3 이문화에 대한 태도가 이문화 제품에 대한 추천의도에 미치는 영향은 유의한 것으로 나타나 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. A. Rosly. (2010). Shariah parameters reconsidered. International Journal of Ialamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(2), 132-146.
  2. G. Rezai, Z. Mohamed & M. N. Shamsuddin. (2011). Non-muslin consumer's understanding of halal principles in malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 3(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831211206572
  3. J. A. Litman, R. P. Collins & C. D. Spielberger. (2005). The nature and measurement of sensory curiosity, Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1123-1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.001
  4. H. G. Voss & H. Keller. (1983). Curiosity and exploration: theories and results. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  5. J. A. Litman & C. D. Spielberger. (2003). The measurement of epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_16
  6. J. Piaget. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
  7. D. E. Berlyne. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 41, 50-68.
  8. D. E. Berlyne. (1957). Uncertainty and conflict: A point of contact between information-theory and behavior-theory concepts. Psychological Review, 64(6), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041135
  9. D. E. Berlyne. (1958). The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(3), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043555
  10. D. E. Berlyne. (1960). Conflict, arousal and curiosity, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  11. D. E. Berlyne. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3731.25
  12. R. P. Collins, J. A. Litman & C. D. Spielberger. (2004). The measurement of perceptual curiosity. Personaloty and Individual Differences, 36, 1127-1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00205-8
  13. M. Fishbein & I. Ajzen. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, Behavior: An Inrtoduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-wesley.
  14. J. J. Cronin. & S. A. Taylor. (1992). Measuring Service Quality; A Reexamination and Extension, Journal of Marketing, 56(July), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600106
  15. T. S. Robertson. (1984). Marketing's Potential Contribu- tion to Consumer Behavior Research: The Case of Diffusion Theory, Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 484-489.
  16. S. H. Ju, M. Y. Song & B. K. Kim. (2018). The Effect of Personal trait on Perceived Value and Recommendation Intention : Focus on one-person media contents, Journal of The Korea Convergence Society, 9(12), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.12.159
  17. Y. K. Ha & H. S. Kim. (2017). The Effects of Service Quality in Referral Intention in the Hotel Restaurants: Moderating Effects of Alternative Attractiveness, Tourism Research, 42(2), 221-238. https://doi.org/10.32780/KTIDOI.2017.42.2.221
  18. A. J. Kang & S. H. Lee. (2014). A study on the impact of the preference for Korean wave on the intention of visits and recommendation -Centered on Chiness people-, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Studies, 16(6), 103-117.
  19. Y. I. Kwon, J. S. Park & S. Y. Han. (2015). The Effect of Festival Experiental Factors on Satisfaction, Revisit Intention and Wilingness to Recommend, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Studies, 17(6), 296-311.
  20. D. M. Koo. (2010). Marketing Research Methodology. Hakhyunsa: Seoul.