Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Characteristics Satisfaction in Digital Convergence based Micro-Learning

디지털융합 기반 마이크로러닝 특성 만족도 연구

  • HAN, Tae In (Division of e-Learning, Korea National Open University)
  • 한태인 (한국방송통신대학교 이러닝학과)
  • Received : 2020.05.07
  • Accepted : 2020.06.20
  • Published : 2020.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study defined the characteristics of micro-learning emerging by mobile learning and micro-contents in the e-learning field, and analyzed the satisfaction of application, to see if micro-learning could become a new learning type in the future. To this end, the characteristics of micro-learning were defined through preliminary literature analysis, the characteristic satisfaction was verified in the well-equipped micro-learning site, and any other technical functions were suggested through expert opinion gathering. It was suggested that the future technology of e-learning should be linked to technical functions such as learning analysis and performance measurement. According to the results of this study, if micro-learning reflects its functional characteristics well, it will become an effective learning type in the e-learning field and will greatly contribute to education, learning, and training for the new millennial.

본 연구는 최근 이러닝 분야에서 모바일 러닝과 마이크로콘텐츠에 의해 부상하고 있는 마이크로러닝의 특성을 정의하고 이에 대한 적용 만족도를 분석하여, 향후 마이크로러닝이 새로운 학습 형태로 자리매김 할 수 있는지를 살펴보았다. 이를 위하여 사전 문헌분석을 통해 마이크로러닝의 특성을 정의하고 잘 갖추어진 마이크로러닝 사이트에 대하여 특성 만족도를 실증 검증하고, 이 특성 이외에 어떤 다른 기술적 기능이 필요한가에 대하여도 전문가의 의견수렴을 통하여 제시하였으며, 이러닝의 미래기술인 학습 분석이나 성과측정 등의 기술적 기능과 향후 연계되어야 한다는 것을 제시하였다. 본 연구의 결과에 따르면 마이크로러닝의 특성인 학습콘텐츠의 질적, 양적 수준, 학습콘텐츠에의 접근성, 모바일 기기 접근성, 동기부여 및 상호작용의 모든 면에서 특성 만족도를 보여주고 있었다. 따라서 마이크로러닝은 그 기능적 특성을 잘 반영한다면 이러닝 분야에서 효과적인 학습 형태로 자리 잡을 것이며 밀레니얼 세대를 위한 교육과 학습 및 훈련에 크게 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. J. Jung. (2019). Design and Implementation of Micro-Learning for corporate education. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 20(9), 1771-1780. DOI : 10.9728/DCS.2019.20.9.1771
  2. T. Hug. (2005). Micro learning and narration. fourth Media Transition conference, 6-8.
  3. M. Kerres. (2012). Microlearning as a challenge for instructional design. Didactics of microlearning: Concepts, discourses and examples, 98-109.
  4. S. Y. Yi. (2009). A Study on The Way of Informal Learning at Corporate Workplace. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development, 11(1), 1-51. DOI : http://doi.org/10.18211/kjhrdq.2009.11.1.001
  5. B. H. Aitchanov, A. B. Satabaldiyev, K. N. Latuta. (2013). Application of Microlearning technique and Twitter for education purpose. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 423, 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/423/1/012044
  6. J. Kusher. (2017). Digital Micro-learning in the Entrepreneurship Classroom. Business Education, 16-19.
  7. H. J. So. & H. R. Lee. (2017). Analysis and Implications of the Research Trend on Micro learning. The Korean Society of Science & Art, 30(9), 189-201. DOI : 10.17548/DCS.2017.09.30.189
  8. I. S. Jung & S. W. Choi. (1998). Open and Distance Education and New Information Technology, Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 163-186. DOI : 10.17232/KSET.14.1.163
  9. G. Y. Lee. (2019). Focusing on Perceived Attributes of Innovation and Needs of Content, Technology, and Operation. Master's thesis. Korea National University of Education, Chung-cheong bukdo.
  10. Theo Hug. (2005). Micro learning and narration. fourth Media in Transition conference, 6-8.
  11. J. Kim & K. S. Song. (2009). EEG based Cognitive Load Measurement for e-learning Application, Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(2), 125-154. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2009.20.2.002
  12. Salas, A. (2017). Microlearning: What It Is Not and What It Should Be. Learning Solutions https://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/2255/microlearning-what-it-is-not-and-what-it-should-be
  13. H. J. Kim, S. J. Lee & J. I. Kim. (2011). The Study on Influential Factors upon Learning Achievement and its Reuse of e-Learning in University. The Journal of internet electronic commerce research, 11(1), 201-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9072-y
  14. W. DeLone & E. McLean. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update, Journal of Management Information Systems. 19(4), 9-30. DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  15. H. J. Lee & K. S. Park. (2009). A Strategy of Learner-Centered Usability Evaluation for Quality Management in e-Learning Contents Development. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 15(3), 63-88.
  16. H. S. Han (2005). A Study on the Evaluation Model and Methodology for the Improvement of SW Usability. Seoul : KIPA.
  17. D. W. Johnson. & R. T. Johnson. (1975). Learning together and alone:Cooperation, competition, and individualization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  18. J. Reeve. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational psychologist, 44, 159-175. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
  19. Y. Liu & I. J. Shrun. (2002). What is interactivity and is it aiways such a good thing? implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of advertising, 31(4), 53-64. DOI : 10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685
  20. Moore, M. G.(1993). Three types of interaction. In K. Harry, J. Mangus, & D. Keegan (Eds.), Distance education: New perspectives, New York: Routledge, 19-24.
  21. K. K. Yoon. (2009). Effects of teacher's feedback and learner's cognitive style on learning motivation in a Simulation learning environments. Master's thesis. Korea National University of Education, Chung-cheong bukdo.
  22. T. I. Han (2006). "e-Learning u-Learning", Korean German Industrial Park Co.,Ltd.,.
  23. T. I. Han, (2014). "IT Convergence and Creative e-learning", episteme.
  24. . H. Park, I. O. Kim, S. M. Jung, K. S. Song & J. B. Kim. (2008). Enhancing e-Learning Interactivity via Emotion Recognition Computing Technology, The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 11(2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2008.11.2.009
  25. J. H. Baek & Y. S. Kim. (2004). Design and Implementation of e-SRM System Supporting Individual Adjusting Feedback in Web-based Learning Environment, Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 8(3), 307-317.
  26. T. I. Han. (2015). A Study on the Standard Policy for the Development Cost of Media Convergence e-Learning Contents. Jornal of Digital Convergence, 13(7), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.7.47
  27. H. M. Park, C. S. Oh., C. S. Yum. (2011). An Empirical Study on the Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction of e-Learning. The Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 9(7), 143-152.
  28. J. S. Kim & M. H. Kang. (2010). Structural Relationship among Teaching Presence, Learning Presence, and Effectiveness of e-Learning in the corporate setting, Asian journal of education, 11(2), 29-56. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2010.11.2.002
  29. C. Redecker. (2009). Review of learning 2.0 practices: Study on the impact of Web 2.0 innovations on education and training in Europe. JRC Scientific and Technical Report. DOI: 10.2791/33043
  30. J. Y. Lee. (2006). A Study of Factors Influencing Learners' Participation and Satisfaction in Online Courses. Andragogy Today : International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 9(4), 27-61.
  31. J. Y. Lee & E. J. Lee. (2010). Influence Analysis of System, Information and Service Qualities on Learner Satisfaction in University e-Learning. Journal of educational studies, 41(3), 119-147.
  32. S. J. Shim. (2011). A Study on the Measuring Satisfaction and Activation Methods of e-Learning. Journal of KECRA, 12(4), 73-91.
  33. T. I. Han. (2015). A Study on the Technical Evaluation of the Quality Certification for e-Learning Contents, Jornal of Digital Convergence, 13(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.1.49
  34. B. H. Lee. (2005). Study on the application process of discourse pattern to improve efficiency of mathematics class for children with mathematics learning difficultiess:utilizing constructivism-based interaction. Doctoral dissertation. Dankook University, Seoul.
  35. C. W. Moo &, J. H. Kim. (2011). Interaction and Flow as the Antecedents of e-Learner Satisfaction. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 14(3), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2011.14.3.006
  36. B. W. Yoon. (2004). (An)empirical study on the factors associated with user's satisfaction of e-learning. Doctoral dissertation. Myong-ji University. Seoul.
  37. S. M. Kim. (2014). Factor Analysis of Online Classes which Effects upon the Police Candidates's Success or failure of the test. Master's thesis. Korea National Open University, Seoul.
  38. ATD TK. (2018). Microlearning: Bite- Sized Content. Alexandria. VA: ATD Press.
  39. J. P. Hong. (2018). Development of Microlearning Content for Critical Path Method in Project Scheduling. Master's thesis. Korea National Open University, Seoul.
  40. A. Fox. (2016, April). Microlearning for Effective Performance Management. Talent Development magazine, 116-117.
  41. T. I. Han. (2017). A Study on Generic Quality Model from Comparison between Korean and French Evaluation Criteria for e-Learning Quality Assurance of Media Convergence. Jornal of Digital Convergence, 15(3), 55-64.A. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.3.55