Journal of Korea Trade

Korea Trade Research Association (한국무역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MNC Subsidiary's Entrepreneurship and Knowledge Transfer: Evidence from MNC Subsidiaries in South Korea

  • Lee, Kangmun (Department of Business Administration, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yang, Ji Yeon (Department of Global Business, The University of Suwon) ;
  • Roh, Taewoo (Department of International Trade and Commerce, Soonchunhyang University)
  • Received : 2020.09.11
  • Accepted : 2020.12.28
  • Published : 2020.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose - This paper attempted to verify the process by which a multinational corporation (MNC)'s subsidiary practices entrepreneurship to create effective knowledge (KC) in the local market. We have looked at whether subsidiary entrepreneurship (SENT) has a moderation effect in creating knowledge for the local market when a subsidiary has been given autonomy (AUT) from the headquarters (HQ). We also argue that when a subsidiary creates meaningful knowledge, the effect of the increased status by the HQ within the MNC network position (NP) has an indirect effect on whether knowledge is transferred to other overseas subsidiaries (KTO). Design/methodology - This paper used a structural equation model (SEM) of 282 effective foreign companies invested in Korea. To test the hypothesis about the process of SENT on KTO, descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, convergent and discriminant validities, and common method bias were analyzed using STATA. In addition, the moderation effect was verified along with SEM. The moderation effect of AUT on SENT and KC was presented graphically by confirming \mathrm{\pm1} standard deviation of AUT for the main effect. Findings - Our findings are as follows. First, while the hypothesis about the direct effect of SENT and KC on KTO was not supported, all other hypotheses were supported. Second, both the AUT and moderating effect and the indirect effect of NP were significant. In the conclusion, these findings are discussed in relation to its various theoretical and practical implications. Originality/value - This study attempted to contribute to the knowledge creation theory of MNC by contemplating how subsidiaries can move away from HQ and grow in the local market. Although there is still a shortage of foreign investment in the Korean market, our practical implications offer guidance for how current subsidiaries can develop more than other overseas subsidiaries.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

References

  1. Adenfelt, M. (2010), "Exploring the Performance of Transnational Projects: Shared Knowledge, Coordination and Communication", International Journal of Project Management, 28(6), 529-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.10.004
  2. Ahsan, M. and S. A. Fernhaber (2019), "Multinational Enterprises: Leveraging a Corporate International Entrepreneurship Lens for New Insights into Subsidiary Initiatives", Journal of International Management, 25(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2018.07.002
  3. Ambos, T. C. and J. Birkinshaw (2010), "Headquarters' Attention and Its Effect on Subsidiary Performance", Management International Review, 50(4), 449-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0041-4
  4. Ambos, T. C., B. Ambos and B. B. Schlegelmilch (2006), "Learning from Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Investigation of Headquarters' Benefit from Reverse Knowledge Transfers", International Business Review, 15(3), 294-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.01.002
  5. Ambos, T. C., U. Andersson and J. Birkinshaw (2010), "What Are the Consequences of InitiativeTaking in Multinational Subsidiaries?", Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1099-1118. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.19
  6. Andersson, U., I. Bjdersso and M. Forsgren (2005), "Managing Subsidiary Knowledge Creation: The Effect of Control Mechanisms on Subsidiary Local Embeddedness", International Business Review, 14(5), 521-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.07.001
  7. Andersson, U., M. Forsgren and U. Holm (2002), "The Strategic Impact of External Networks: Subsidiary Performance and Competence Development in The Multinational Corporation", Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 979-996. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.267
  8. Baraldi, E. and M. Ratajczak-Mrozek (2019), "From Supplier to Center of Excellence and Beyond: The Network Position Development of a Business Unit Within "IKEA Industry", Journal of Business Research, 100, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.008
  9. Birkinshaw, J. (1999), "The Determinants and Consequences of Subsidiary Initiative in Multinational Corporations", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 9-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902400102
  10. Birkinshaw, J. and N, Hood (1998), "Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies", Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 773-795. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.1255638
  11. Birkinshaw, J., N. Hood and S. Jonsson (1998), "Building Firm-Specific Advantages in Multinational Corporations: The Role of Subsidiary Initiative", Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 221-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<221::AID-SMJ948>3.0.CO;2-P
  12. Birkinshaw, J., N. Hood and S. Young (2005), "Subsidiary Entrepreneurship, Internal and External Competitive Forces, and Subsidiary Performance", International Business Review, 14(2), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.010
  13. Bjorkman, I., W. Barner-Rasmussen and L. Li (2004), "Managing Knowledge Transfer in MNCs: The Impact of Headquarters Control Mechanisms", Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400094
  14. Bouquet, C. and J. Birkinshaw (2008), "Weight Versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention from Corporate Headquarters", Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 577-601. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.32626039
  15. Cho, D. S. (2014), Mechanism-based Perspective: A New Strategic Paradigm for Integrated Management, Seoul: Seoul Economics and Management Publication.
  16. Clark, K. and I. Ramachandran (2019), "Subsidiary Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial Opportunity: An Institutional Perspective", Journal of International Management, 25(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2018.06.001
  17. Conroy, K. M. and D. G. Collings (2016), "The Legitimacy of Subsidiary Issue Selling: Balancing Positive & Negative Attention from Corporate Headquarters", Journal of World Business, 51(4), 612-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.03.002
  18. Corry, S. and K. Cormican (2019), "Towards Innovation in Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries: Development of an Instrument to Select and Evaluate Value Driven Strategies", Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 14(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242019000100025
  19. Dellestrand, H., P. Kappen and O. Lindahl (2020), "Headquarter Resource Allocation Strategies and Subsidiary Competitive or Cooperative Behavior: Achieving a Fit for Value Creation", Journal of Organization Design, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-019-0064-7
  20. Dess, G.G., R. D. Ireland, S. A. Zahra, S. W. Floyd, J. J. Jay and P. J. Lane (2003), "Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship", Journal of Management, 29(3), 351-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00015-1
  21. Dorrenbacher, C. and J. Gammelgaard (2016), "Subsidiary Initiative Taking in Multinational Corporations: The Relationship between Power and Issue Selling", Organization Studies, 37(9), 1249-1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616634130
  22. Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker (1981), "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  23. Gammelgaard, J., F. Mcdonald, A. Stephan, H. Tuselmann and C. Dorrenbscher (2012), "The Impact of Increases in Subsidiary Autonomy and Network Relationships on Performance", International Business Review, 21(6), 1158-1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.01.001
  24. Geleilate, J. M. G., D. S. Andrews and S. Fainshmidt (2019), "Subsidiary Autonomy and Subsidiary Performance: A Meta-Analysis", Journal of World Business, 55(4), 101049.
  25. Goh, S. W. (2002), "Managing Effective Knowledge Transfer: An Integrative Framework and Some Practice Implication", Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210417664
  26. Gupta, A. K. and V. Govindarajan (2000), "Knowledge Flow within Multinational Corporations", Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I
  27. Hakanson, L. and R. Nobel (2001), "Organizational Characteristics and Reverse Knowledge Transfer", Management International Review, 40(Special Issue), 29-48.
  28. Harman, H. H. (1976), Modern Factor Analysis, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  29. Hu, L. T. and P. M. Bentler (1999), "Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  30. Inkpen, A. C. and E. W. Tsang (2005), "Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer", Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 146-165.
  31. Kawai, N. and R. Strange (2014), "Subsidiary Autonomy and Performance in Japanese Multinationals in Europe", International Business Review, 23(3), 504-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.08.012
  32. Kim, J. O. and C. W. Mueller (1978), Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  33. Kock, N. and G. Lynn (2012), "Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in variance-based Sem: An Illustration and Recommendations", Journal of The Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546-580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302
  34. Kostova, T. (1999), "Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective", Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308-324. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1893938
  35. Lai, C., Q. Wang, X. Li and X. Hu (2016), "The Influence of Individual Espoused Cultural Values on Self-Directed Use of Technology for Language Learning Beyond the Classroom", Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 676-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.039
  36. Lee, J. Y., A. Jimenez and K. R. Bhandari (2020), "Subsidiary Roles and Dual Knowledge Flows between MNE Subsidiaries and Headquarters: The Moderating Effects of Organizational Governance Types", Journal of Business Research, 108, 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.065
  37. Lee, Kang-Moon (2011), "The Determinants of Subsidiary Reverse Knowledge Transfer: The Case of Foreign MNC Subsidiaries in Korea", Journal of CEO and Management Studies, 14(1), 1-25.
  38. Lee, R. P., Q. Chen, D. Kim and J. L. Johnson (2008), "Knowledge Transfer between Multinational Corporations' Headquarters and Their Subsidiaries: Influences on and Implications for New Product Outcomes", Journal of International Marketing, 16(2), 1-31.
  39. Lee, S. H. and C. Williams (2007), "Dispersed Entrepreneurship within Multinational Corporations: A Community Perspective", Journal of World Business, 42(4), 505-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.08.001
  40. Li, J. and R. P. Lee (2015), "Can Knowledge Transfer within MNCs Hurt Subsidiary Performance? The Role of Subsidiary Entrepreneurial Culture and Capabilities", Journal of World Business, 50(4), 663-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.09.004
  41. Li, L. (2005), "The Effects of Trust and Shared Vision on Inward Knowledge Transfer in Subsidiaries' Intra-and Inter-Organizational Relationships", International Business Review, 14(1), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.12.005
  42. Lumpkin, G. T., C. C. Cogliser and D. R. Schneider (2009), "Understanding and Measuring Autonomy: An Entrepreneurial Orientation Perspective", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00280.x
  43. Minbaeva, D. T. (2007), "Knowledge Transfer in Multinational Corporations", Management International Review, 47(4), 567-593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0030-4
  44. Minbaeva, D. T. P., I. Bjorkman, C. Fey and H. J. Park (2003), "MNC Knowledge Transfer, Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity and HRM", Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 586-599. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400056
  45. Mudambi, R., L. Piscitello and L. Rabbiosi (2014), "Reverse Knowledge Transfer in MNEs: Subsidiary Innovativeness and Entry Modes", Long Range Planning, 47(1-2), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.013
  46. Najafi-Tavani, Z., A. Giroud and U. Andersson (2014), "The Interplay of Networking Activities and Internal Knowledge Actions for Subsidiary Influence Within MNCs", Journal of World Business, 49(1), 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.02.004
  47. Najafi-Tavani, Z., G. Zaefarian, P. Naude and A. Giroud (2015), "Reverse Knowledge Transfer and Subsidiary Power", Industrial Marketing Management, 48, 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.03.021
  48. Nonaka, I., U. Katushiro, and S. Dai (1996), "From Information Processing to Knowledge Creation: A Paradigm Shift in Business Management", Technology in Society, 18(2), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791X(96)00001-2
  49. O'Brien, D., S. P. Scott, U. Andersson, T. Ambos and N. Fu (2019), "The Microfoundations of Subsidiary Initiatives: How Subsidiary Manager Activities Unlock Entrepreneurship", Global Strategy Journal, 9(1), 66-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1200
  50. Paterson, S. L. and D. M. Brock (2002), "The Development of Subsidiary Management Research: Review and The Practical Analysis", International Business Review, 11(1), 139-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(01)00053-1
  51. Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. Mackenzie, J.-Y. Lee and N. P. Podsakoff (2003), "Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  52. Scott, P., P. Gibbons and J. Coughlan (2010), "Developing Subsidiary Contribution to the MNC-Subsidiary Entrepreneurship and Strategy Creativity", Journal of International Management, 16(4), 328-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.09.004
  53. Song, J. Y. (2014), "Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Transfer within Multinational Corporations", Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.55
  54. Sumelius, J. and R. Sarala (2008), "Knowledge Development in MNC Subsidiaries: The Influence of MNC Internal and External Knowledge and Control Mechanisms", Thunderbird International Business Review, 50(4), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20202
  55. Van Egeraat, C. and P. Breathnach (2012), "The Drivers of Transnational Subsidiary Evolution: The Upgrading of Process R&D in The Irish Pharmaceutical Industry", Regional Studies, 46(9), 1153-1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.657620
  56. Wang, N. and Y. Wang (2020), "Does Parenting Matter in Subsidiary Innovation in Emerging Economies? Exploring the Role of Parent Superior Competitiveness in Affecting Subsidiary Contextual Ambidexterity", International Business Review, 101673 (forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101673
  57. Wang, N., Y. Hua, G. Wu, C. Zhao and Y. Wang (2019), "Reverse Transfer of Innovation and Subsidiary Power: A Moderated Mediation Model", Journal of Business Research, 103, 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.057
  58. Yang, Q., R. Mudambi and K. E. Mayer (2008), "Conventional and Reverse Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporation", Journal of Management, 34(5), 882-902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321546
  59. Yu, Y., Y. Liu and T. Bai (2019), "Does Attention from Headquarters Influence Subsidiary Behavior? A Social Psychological Perspective", Long Range Planning, 52(4), 101877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.03.003
  60. Zahra, S. A., A. P. Nielsen and W. C. Bogner (1999), "Corporate Entrepreneurship, Knowledge, and Competence Development", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300310
  61. Zhang, H., C. Shu, X. Jiang and A. Malter (2010), "Managing Knowledge for Innovation: The Role of Coorperation, Competition, and Alliance Nationality", International Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.18.4.74