DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Satisfaction with the Effect of Local Dynamical Micro-massage Therapy on the Pain and Discomfort after Breast Reconstruction Surgery

  • Ahn, Kwang Hyeon (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sun Jae (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Park, Eun Soo (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Park, Yu Gil (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital)
  • Received : 2019.12.27
  • Accepted : 2020.01.07
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

Background and Objectives Breast reconstruction has the advantage of reducing the loss of the body image of patients after mastectomy surgery, and also improving the quality of the social and sexual life of breast cancer patients. However, in surprising and unfortunate number of patients, acute postoperative pain persists beyond the normal course of postsurgical recovery. We set out to investigate the effect of local dynamical micro-massage (LDM) treatment for achieving pain relief and reducing other postoperative complications. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis on 58 patients who underwent LDM treatment for postoperative pain management at Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital between February 2017 and June 2019. Those patients who complained of persistent postoperative pain, which was uncontrollable with medication, were treated with LDM. The degree of pain and discomfort with contracture were recorded using numerical rating scale (NRS) scoring system with numbers from 0 to 10 ('none' to 'worst'). Results The median NRS score of pain was reduced by 62.3% from the start to the end of LDM treatment (p<0.001). Further, the NRS score of discomfort with contracture was reduced 66.0% (p<0.001). There was no complication related to the LDM treatment. Conclusion Dual-frequency ultrasound LDM can be an effective therapeutic option for persisting pain after breast reconstruction surgery. It was also effective in improvement of discomfort with contracture and erythema of the surgical wound.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

References

  1. Guyomard V, Leinster S, Wilkinson M. Systematic review of studies of patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Breast 2007;16:547-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2007.04.004
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Details on the criteria and method of application of allowance of medical care_revision [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare [cited 2018 Mar 27]. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/index.jsp.
  3. Ducic I, Seiboth LA, Iorio ML. Chronic postoperative breast pain: danger zones for nerve injuries. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:41-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f9587f
  4. Kulkarni AR, Pusic AL, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Qi J, Wilkins EG, et al. Factors associated with acute postoperative pain following breast reconstruction. JPRAS Open 2017;11:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2016.08.005
  5. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 2006;367:1618-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X
  6. Garimella V, Cellini C. Postoperative pain control. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2013;26:191-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1351138
  7. Hashish I, Hai HK, Harvey W, Feinmann C, Harris M. Reduction of postoperative pain and swelling by ultrasound treatment: a placebo effect. Pain 1988;33:303-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90289-8
  8. Michlovitz SL. Thermal agents in rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Davis; 1990.
  9. Choi YS, Park ES. Application of dual-frequency ultrasound to radiation-induced fibrosis in a breast cancer patient. Med Lasers Eng Basic Res Clin Appl 2017;6:86-9.
  10. Bonica JJ. The need of a taxonomy. Pain 1979;6:247-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(79)90046-0
  11. Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg 2003;97:534-40. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E
  12. Gan TJ, Habib AS, Miller TE, White W, Apfelbaum JL. Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical pain: results from a US national survey. Curr Med Res Opin 2014;30:149-60. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2013.860019
  13. Fletcher D, Stamer UM, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Zaslansky R, Tanase NV, Perruchoud C, et al. Chronic postsurgical pain in Europe: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015;32:725-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000319
  14. Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Segelcke D, Schug SA. Postoperative painfrom mechanisms to treatment. Pain Rep 2017;2:e588. https://doi.org/10.1097/pr9.0000000000000588
  15. Denier A. Les ultra-sons appliques a la medecine. Paris: L'Expansion scientifique francaise; 1951.
  16. Watson T. Electrotherapy: evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008.
  17. Baker KG, Robertson VJ, Duck FA. A review of therapeutic ultrasound: biophysical effects. Phys Ther 2001;8:1351-8.
  18. Choi YS, Nam SM, Park ES. Clinical experience of an effective treatment of intractable chronic venous ulcer on the lower leg using dual-frequency ultrasound. Med Lasers Eng Basic Res Clin Appl 2017;6:29-31.
  19. Lee WS, Park ES, Kang SG, Tak MS, Kim CH. Successful treatment of recalcitrant remaining postoperative wounds by dual-frequency ultrasound. Med Lasers Eng Basic Res Clin Appl 2018;7:74-8.
  20. Tausch I, Kruglikov I. The benefit of dual-frequency ultrasound in patients treated by injection lipolysis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2015;8:42-6.