Journal of Industrial Convergence (산업융합연구)

DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management (대한산업경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring Research Trends in Curriculum through Keyword Network Analysis

키워드 네트워크 분석을 통한 교육과정 연구 동향 탐색

  • 장봉석 (국립목포대학교 교육학과)
  • Received : 2020.03.22
  • Accepted : 2020.04.20
  • Published : 2020.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze relationships among essential keywords in curriculum. The number of 1,935 keyword was collected from 644 manuscripts published between 2002 and 2019. For data analysis, this study selected softwares of KrKwic and KrTitle to compose a 1-mode network matrix and UCINET 6 and NetDraw to implement network analysis and visualization. Results are as follows. First, the frequency of keyword was curriculum, curriculum development, national curriculum, competency-based curriculum, 2015 revised national curriculum, curriculum implementation, understanding by design, competency, teacher education, school curriculum, and IBDP from highest to lowest. Second, degree centrality was curriculum development, curriculum, competency-based curriculum, national curriculum, 2015 revised national curriculum, understanding by design, competency, key competency, high school curriculum, textbook, curriculum implementation, teacher education, and IBDP from highest to lowest.

이 연구는 교육과정 분야의 연구에서 중요하게 다루어지는 키워드와 그들의 관계를 살펴보기 위해 실시되었다. 연구를 위해 2002년부터 2019년까지 게재된 644편의 교육과정 논문에서 1,935개의 키워드를 추출하여 분석하였다. 자료 분석 단계에서는 KrKwic와 KrTitle 프로그램을 통해 키워드를 추출한 후 1-mode network matrix를 작성하였고, UCINET 6과 NetDraw 프로그램을 활용하여 네트워크 분석과 시각화 작업을 수행하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 전체 키워드 출현 빈도 분석 결과, 교육과정이 가장 많이 출현하였으며, 다음은 교육과정 개발, 국가 교육과정, 역량기반 교육과정, 2015 개정 교육과정, 교육과정 실행, 이해중심 교육과정, 교사 교육, 학교 교육과정, IBDP 등의 순으로 나타났다. 둘째, 연결 중심성 분석 결과에 따르면, 교육과정 개발이 가장 높게 나타났다. 이와 함께 교육과정, 역량기반 교육과정, 국가 교육과정, 2015 개정 교육과정, 이해중심 교육과정, 역량, 핵심 역량, 고등학교 교육과정, 교과서, 교육과정 실행, 교사 교육, IBDP 등의 순서로 높게 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. W. Park & L. Leydesdorff. (2004). Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), 1377-1388.
  2. M. Park & Y. K. Sung. (2011). Trends of curriculum research: Research areas and methods analysis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(4), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.29.4.201112.002
  3. B. Yoon. (1998). Toward an Alternative Approach to Curriculum Inquiry. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(2), 1-26.
  4. K. So, Y. Hu, J. Park & Y. Chang. (2019). A Meta-analysis of International Trends in Curriculum Studies: Based on the Papers Presented in AERA since 2010. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 117-142. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.37.4.6
  5. Q. L. Sun. (1992). The Division of Words of High Frequency and Low Frequency. Information Science, 13(2), 28-32.
  6. S. B. Jang & D. Han. (2017). Meta-Synthesis of National Curriculum Studies: Focusing on Practical Implications for Policy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 325-353.
  7. B. H. Yoon. (2001). A Historical Review of the Curriculum Studies in Korea. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(1), 139-158.
  8. S. Hur. (2002). A Reflection on Curriculum Inquiry: History and Prospect. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), 1-22.
  9. S. P. Borgatti, M. G. Everett & J. C. Johnson. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. Sage Publications.
  10. B. H. Yoon. (1998). Towards an Alternative Approach to Curriculum Inquiry. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(2), 1-26.
  11. H. Hong & K. Baek. (2004). An examination of research areas and it's justification for the establishment of curriculum studies identity (2): focusing on the three factors. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(4), 27-48.