References
- American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). 2018 Plastic surgery statistics report [internet]. Arlington Heights, IL: ASPS; c2019 [cited 2020 Feb 15]. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics.
- International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS). International survey of aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2018 [internet]. Hanover, NH: ISAPS [cited 2020 Feb 15]. Available from: http://www.isaps.org.
- Cronin TD, Gerow FJ. Augmentation mammaplasty: a new "natural feel" prosthesis. In: Broadbent TR, editor. Transactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic Surgery. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica Foundation; 1964. p. 41-9.
- Maxwell GP, Baker MR. Augmentation mammaplasty: general considerations. In: Spear SL, editor. Surgery of the breast. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 1237.
- Danino AM, Basmacioglu P, Saito S, et al. Comparison of the capsular response to the Biocell RTV and Mentor 1600 Siltex breast implant surface texturing: a scanning electron microscopic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:2047-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200112000-00032
- Cunningham B. The Mentor study on contour profile gel silicone MemoryGel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):33S-39S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286665.91043.bc
- Cunningham B. The Mentor core study on silicone MemoryGel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):19S-32S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286574.88752.04
- Bengtson BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, et al. Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):40S-48S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286666.29101.11
-
Stevens WG, Harrington J, Alizadeh K, et al. Five-year follow-up data from the U.S. clinical trial for Sientra's U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved
$Silimed^{(R)}$ brand round and shaped implants with high-strength silicone gel. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:973-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826b7d2f - Handel N, Jensen JA, Black Q, et al. The fate of breast implants: a critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:1521-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199512000-00003
- Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Berry C, et al. Acellular dermal matrix-assisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction and capsular contracture: a 13-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;138:329-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002331
- Banbury J, Yetman R, Lucas A, et al. Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: sensory changes, muscle function, and body image. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:701-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000101503.94322.C6
- Han J, Jeong JH, Bang SI, et al. BellaGel breast implant: 4-year results of a prospective cohort study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2019;53:232-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2019.1583572
Cited by
- Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref vol.47, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.01697
- Current status of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in South Korea vol.64, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2021.64.1.5
- Analysis of the Molecular Signature of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma in an Asian Patient vol.41, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa398