DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Analysis of Educational Content and Curriculum of UNESCO's Media and Information Literacy

UNESCO의 미디어와 정보 리터러시의 교육내용 분석과 교육과정에 관한 연구

  • 박주현 (전남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2020.04.16
  • Accepted : 2020.05.13
  • Published : 2020.05.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the concept, contents, and curriculum of MIL(Media and Information Literacy) proposed by UNESCO from the perspective of Library and Information Science to obtain the basic information necessary for the revision of the Library and Information Life curriculum and to derive implications. As a result of the analysis, UNESCO used the term MIL to highlight the characteristics and importance of information literacy in media education. The information literacy and library literacy were key factors in forming the concept and curriculum of MIL. UNESCO also presented 'information literacy and library skills' as essential areas of the MIL curriculum, as well as core competencies and achievement criteria. In addition, the MIL curriculum actively embraces information literacy and library literacy, with the five laws of MIL based on the five laws of library science. The results of this study could be used as a basis for the reason why MIL should be actively accepted in Library and Information Science and for the revision of Library and Information Life curriculum.

본 연구의 목적은 UNESCO가 제안한 미디어와 정보 리터러시(MIL: Media and Information Literacy)의 개념과 교육내용 및 교육과정을 문헌정보학의 관점에서 탐구하여 도서관과 정보생활 교육과정의 개정에 필요한 기초 정보를 얻고 시사점을 도출하는 데 있다. 분석결과, UNESCO는 미디어 교육에서 정보 리터러시의 특성과 중요성을 부각시키기 위하여 MIL이라는 용어를 사용하였으며, 정보 리터러시와 도서관 리터러시는 MIL의 개념과 교육과정을 구성하는 핵심적인 요인이었다. 또한 UNESCO는 MIL 교육과정의 필수적인 영역으로 '정보 리터러시와 도서관 역량(skills)'을 제시하였고, 핵심역량과 성취 기준도 제시하고 있다. 뿐만 아니라 도서관학의 5법칙을 토대로 MIL의 5법칙도 제시하는 등 MIL 교육과정은 정보 리터러시와 도서관 리터러시를 적극적으로 수용하고 있다. 본 연구 결과는 문헌정보학에서 MIL을 적극적으로 수용해야 하는 이유와 도서관과 정보생활 교육과정 개정에 필요한 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, Bong-Suk. 2018. "A Case Study on School Library Educational Services to Reduce the Information Literacy Gap Due to the Education Gap." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(3): 307-329. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.3.201809.307
  2. Kim, Sung-Jun. 2011. "A Study on the Development of Information Literacy Textbook, School Library and Information Literacy." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3): 271-292. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.3.201109.271
  3. Kim, Soojung. 2015. "Research Trends of Information Literacy Instruction in the Library and Information Science Field." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(3): 207-239. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.3.207
  4. Kim, Jong-Sung. 2019. "Current Issues and Prospects of the Era of School Library Promotion Act-with a focus on manpower issue-." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4): 159-180. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.4.201912.159
  5. Park, Juhyeon. 2018. "A Study on the Development of Conceptualization Model for Reading, Information, ICT, and Digital Literacy." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(2): 267-300. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.49.2.201806.267
  6. Bae, Kyung-Jae and Park, Hee-Jin. 2013. "A Study on the Current Condition and the Improvement of Digital Literacy Education." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2): 241-265. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.2.201306.241
  7. Song, Giho. 2011. "Alternative Measures for Improvement of Information Literacy as Cross Curricula under the National Curriculum in Korea." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(2): 29-50. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.2.201106.29
  8. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2011. "A Study on the Developmental Tools of Performance Task for Information Literacy Instruction." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(4): 31-50. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.4.201112.31
  9. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2019. "A Study on the Direction of 'Library and Information Life' Curriculum Revision Based on '2015 Revised National Curriculum'." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 53(2): 49-68.
  10. Jung, Youngmi. 2018. "A Study on Digital Literacy Education for Adults in US Public Libraries." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(1): 359-380.
  11. Chung, Jun-Min. 2009. "A Library Service Model Toward Ubiquitous City." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 20(3): 163-169.
  12. Chung, Jun-Min. 2013. "An Analytical Approach to One-Person-Library." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(3): 25-47. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.025
  13. Choi, Jae-Hwang. 2016. "Considering Core Ideas of ACRL Information Literacy 'Framework (2015)'." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(3): 171-191. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.171
  14. Korea Library Association. School Library Curriculum Committee. 2007. Library and Information Life Curriculum Standards. Seoul: Korea Library Association.
  15. ALA Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. 1989. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. [online] [cited 2020. 3. 1.]
  16. American Association of School Librarians. 2018. National School Library Standards for learners, School Librarians, and School Libraries. Chicago: ALA.
  17. American Association of School Librarians and Association for Educational Communications and Technology. 1998. Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning. Chicago: ALA.
  18. Association of College and Research Libraries. 2000. Information Literacy Competence Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
  19. Badke, W. 2009. "Media, ICT, and Information Literacy." Online, 33(5): 47-49.
  20. Battelle for Kids. 2019. Framework for 21st Century Learning Definitions. [online] [cited 2020. 2. 20.]
  21. Catts, R. 2010. UNESCO information Literacy Indicators: Validation Report. Paris: UNESCO.
  22. Catts, R. and Lau, J. 2008. Towards Information Literacy Indicators. Paris: UNESCO.
  23. Celot, P. and Perez Tornero J. M. 2009. A Comprehensive View of the Concept of Media Literacy and an Understanding of how Media Literacy Levels in Europe should be assessed. [online] [cited 2020. 2. 10.]
  24. Eisenberg, M. and Berkowitz, R. 1988. Curriculum initiative: an agenda and strategy for library media programs. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  25. Grizzle A. and Singh J. 2016. "Five Laws of Media and Information Literacy as Harbingers of Human Rights." In Singh, J., Kerr, P. & Hamburger, E. ed. MILID Yearbook 2016, Media and Information Literacy: Reinforcing Human Rights, Countering Radicalization and Extremism. Paris: UNESCO.
  26. IFLA. 2015. The Alexandria Proclamation on Information Literacy and Lifelong Learning. [online] [cited 2020. 3. 15.]
  27. IFLA. 2020. COVID-19 and the Global Library Field. [online] [cited 2020. 5. 8.]
  28. Lin, T., Mokhtar, I. A. and Wang, L. 2015. "The construct of media and information literacy in Singapore education system: global trends and local policies." Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35(4): 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2013.860012
  29. Murray, T., Clermont, Y. and Binkley, M. 2005. "Measuring Adult Literacy and Life Skills: New Frameworks for Assessment." Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 89-552-MIE, no.13
  30. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. 2002. Public Law 107-110. [online] [cited 2020. 3. 1.]
  31. OECD. 2008. The OECD Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies. Paris: OECD.
  32. OECD. 2010. PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Paris: OECD.
  33. OECD. 2016. PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Frameworks May 2016. [online] [cited 2020. 4. 3.]
  34. Office of Communication. 2020. What is Ofcom's definition of media literacy? [online] [cited 2020. 4. 3.]
  35. Pasadas, C. 2007. Personal communication with J Lau.
  36. Singh, J., Kerr, P. and Hamburger, E. 2016. MILID Yearbook: Media and Information Literacy: Reinforcing Human Rights, Countering Radicalization and Extremism. Paris: UNESCO.
  37. UNAOC. 2013. Freedom of Expression Toolkit. [online] [cited 2020. 3. 3.]
  38. UNESCO. 2011. Media and information literacy curriculum for teachers. [online] [cited 2020. 1. 5.]
  39. UNESCO. 2013. Global Media and Information Literacy Assessment Framework: country readiness and competencies. [online] [cited 2020. 2. 10.]
  40. Zurkowski, P. G. 1974. The Information Service Environment: Relationships and Priorities. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. Related Pater No. 5. [online] [cited 2020. 3. 17.]