DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Systematic Review of the Attributes of Interior Design Affecting User's Positive Emotions Measured via Bio-Signals

생체신호 기반 사용자의 긍정적인 감정에 영향을 미치는 실내디자인 특성에 관한 문헌고찰

  • 김시은 (연세대학교 실내건축학과) ;
  • 하미경 (연세대학교 실내건축학과)
  • Received : 2020.03.05
  • Accepted : 2020.05.05
  • Published : 2020.05.30

Abstract

Environmental conditions are known to impact human health and behavior, emotions such as pleasure, anxiety, and depression, and reduce stress. Interior design that elevates emotional comfort and satisfaction can help improve mental health and well-being. This study is a systematic review that analyzed previous empirical studies that explored the effect of interior design elements on the user's emotional response which is quantitatively evaluated by bio-signal and qualitatively evaluated through self-reported questionnaire surveys. This paper aims to derive the attributes of interior design and biometric indicators that affect the user's positive emotion through the synthesis of previous studies and to confirm the feasibility of measuring bio-signals as an objective evaluation tool for architectural design and as a quantitative research method. As a result of the review, the biometric data from EEG, fMRI, ECG, EMG, GSR, and eye-tracking were used to measure the participants' emotional responses, which were manifested as positive or negative depending on certain attributes of interior design such as the form, color, lighting, material and furniture. The attributes of interior design related to the positive emotional response were the curved shape, high ceiling, openness of space, and subdued tone colors. Standard lighting conditions and wooden spaces were related to stress reduction in terms of comfort and relaxation. The free arrangement of furniture was related to the user's positive emotions. On the other hand, consistent experimental protocols could not be found, and although the sample sizes of the studies were small, the studies have demonstrated the feasibility of the emotional response measurement by using the biometric data. Therefore this method can be a useful objective tool in the measurement of human-centric data in architectural design, and to develop the evidence-based design to induce positive emotions and minimize stress.

Keywords

References

  1. Banaei, M., Hatami, J., Yazdanfar, A., & Gramann, K. (2017). Walking through Architectural Spaces: The Impact of Interior Forms on Human Brain Dynamics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11.
  2. Bower, I., Tucker, R., & Enticott, P. G. (2019). Impact of built environment design on emotion measured via neuro physiological correlates and subjective indicators: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66, 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101344
  3. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
  4. Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(7), 370-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003
  5. Eberhard, J. P. (2009). Brain landscape the coexistence of neuroscience and architecture: Oxford University Press.
  6. Ergan, S., Radwan, A., Zou, Z., Tseng, H.-a., & Han, X. (2018). Quantifying Human Experience in Architectural Spaces with Integrated Virtual Reality and Body Sensor Networks. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 33(2)
  7. Franz, G., Von Der Heyde, M., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2005). An empirical approach to the experience of architectural space in virtual reality-Exploring relations between features and affective appraisals of rectangular indoor spaces. Automation in Construction, 14(2), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.07.009
  8. Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Vol. 4): John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Kalantari, S. (2019). A New Method of Human Response Testing to Enhance the Design Process. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 1883-1892.
  10. Kalantari, S., Cruze-Garza, J., Banner, P., & Contreras-Vidal, J. L. (2018). Computationally Analyzing Biometric Data and Virtual Response Testing in Evaluating Learning Performance of Educational Setting Through.
  11. Kotradyova, V., Vavrinsky, E., Kalinakova, B., Petro, D., Jansakova, K., Boles, M., & Svobodova, H. (2019). Wood and its impact on humans and environment quality in health care facilities. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(18).
  12. Kuller, R., Mikellides, B., & Janssens, J. (2009). Color, arousal, and performance-A comparison of three experiments. Color Research & Application, 34(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.20476
  13. Lee, Y. Y., & Hsieh, S. (2014). Classifying different emotional states by means of EEG-based functional connectivity patterns. Plos One, 9(4).
  14. Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis, Oxford University Press.
  15. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, The MIT Press.
  16. Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145
  17. Sallis, J. F., Cervero, R. B., Ascher, W., Henderson, K. A., Kraft, M. K., & Kerr, J. (2006). An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 27, 297-322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100
  18. Shemesh, A., Talmon, R., Karp, O., Amir, I., Bar, M., & Grobman, Y. J. (2017). Affective response to architecture -investigating human reaction to spaces with different geometry. Architectural Science Review, 60(2), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2016.1266597
  19. Shin, Y. B., Woo, S. H., Kim, D. H., Kim, J., Kim, J. J., & Park, J. Y. (2015). The effect on emotions and brain activity by the direct/indirect lighting in the residential environment. Neurosci Lett, 584, 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.09.046
  20. Sternberg, E. M., & Wilson, M. A. (2006). Neuroscience and architecture: Seeking common ground. Cell, 127(2), 239-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.012
  21. Tuszynska-Bogucka, W., Kwiatkowski, B., Chmielewska, M., Dzienkowski, M., Kocki, W., Pelka, J., & Galkowski, D. (2019). The effects of interior design on wellness -Eye tracking analysis in determining emotional experience of architectural space. A survey on a group of volunteers from the Lublin Region, Eastern Poland. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine.
  22. Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Gonzalez-Mora, J. L., Leder, H., & Skov, M. (2015). Architectural design and the brain: Effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.006
  23. Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., Modrono, C., & Skov, M. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110 Suppl 2, 10446-10453. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301227110
  24. Vecchiato, G., Tieri, G., Jelic, A., De Matteis, F., Maglione, A. G., & Babiloni, F. (2015). Electroencephalographic Correlates of Sensorimotor Integration and Embodiment during the Appreciation of Virtual Architectural Environments. Front Psychol, 6, 1944.
  25. Wheaton, B., Nisenbaum, R., Glazier, R. H., Dunn, J. R., & Chambers, C. (2015). The neighbourhood effects on health and well-being (NEHW) study. Health & Place, 31, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.11.001
  26. Yoon, S. Y., & Wise, K. (2014). Reading emotion of color environments: computer simulations with self-reports and physiological signals. In Industrial applications of affective engineering (pp. 219-232): Springer.
  27. Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by design. Environment/ behavior /neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning, New York, W.W. Norton & Company.