The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on Attribute Recognition and Word of Mouth Intention of SNS Advertising - Focused on Facebook, Instagram, KaKaoStory and Twitter

SNS 광고의 속성인식과 구전의도 비교연구 - 페이스북, 인스타그램, 카카오스토리, 트위터를 중심으로

  • 정창준 (청주대학교 광고홍보학과)
  • Received : 2020.02.27
  • Accepted : 2020.03.22
  • Published : 2020.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

SNS media is gaining its media share with the benefits of digital technology, such as the convenience of physical access and the entertainment and interactivity of contents, and are becoming a part of users' lives. As media contents consumers move from traditional media to SNS, marketing communication activities are rapidly adapting to leading SNS platforms such as Facebook. This study compares how users perceive four advertisement attributes in each SNS, focusing on Facebook, Instagram, Kakao Story, and Twitter, where the media content creation and consumption systems are relatively similar to each other. The impact on eWOM intention was identified. In addition, we discussed effective SNS operation.

SNS미디어가 디지털 기술의 혜택으로 물리적인 접근성의 편리와 콘텐츠가 갖는 오락성·상호작용성 등의 새로운 미디어의 특장점으로 미디어 점유율을 높이며, 이용자들의 생활의 일부로 자리잡아가고 있다. 미디어 콘텐츠 소비자들이 기존 전통 미디어에서 SNS로 대거 이동함에 따라 마케팅 커뮤니케이션 활동도 페이스북 등 앞서가는 SNS 플랫폼에 발빠르게 적응해 가는 중이다. 본 연구는 미디어 콘텐츠의 생성과 소비 시스템이 서로 비교적 유사한 페이스북, 인스타그램, 카카오스토리, 트위터를 중심으로, 사용자들이 각각의 SNS에서 네 가지 광고속성을 어떻게 인식하는지를 비교하고, 이 속성들이 구전의도에 미치는 영향력을 확인하였다. 또 이를 통한 효과적인 SNS 운용에 대해 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Consumer Agency. (2016). Research Report, Online (Mobile) SNS Advertising Problems and Improvements, 2016.5. : KCA.
  2. KISDI. (2018). KISDI STAT Report. Vol.18-11. Seoul : KISDI.
  3. S. J. Lee. (2019. 8. 23). KAA Journal Internet Shopping, In the open market with mobile. [Online]. http://www.dmcmedia.co.kr/notice/noticeView?dc_idx=23&dn_idx=992
  4. K. Y. Kim, W. J. Lee. (2017). A Study on the Effect of Social Media Content Types of Corporate Marketing on User Purchase Intention. Venture Start-up Research. 12-3(51).
  5. H. A. Cha. (2019. 1. 10). Naver-Kakao rediscover mobile adrevenue. [Online]. http://it.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2019/01/09/2019010902778.html
  6. D. C. An, S. H. Kim. (2012). A Study on Ad Attribute Evaluation and Attitude by SNS Type: Comparison of blog, twitter, facebook and youtube. Korean Journal of Advertising, 23(3).
  7. Boyd & Ellison. (2007), Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  8. KISDI. (2019). KISDI STAT Report. Vol.19-10. Seoul : KISDI.
  9. Y. H. Jang. (2016. 10. 25). KakaoTalk domestic messenger share 95%. [Online]. https://news.joins.com/article/20775022.
  10. S. Y. Park. (2009. 11. 16). Who dominates SNS, will rule the world. [Online]. https://www.adic.or.kr/journal/column/show.do?ukey=76273.
  11. Ducoffe, R. H. (1996). Advertising Value and Advertising on the Web, Journal of Advertising Research. 36(5).
  12. M. K. Cha, H. J. Lee. (2018). Impact of SNS Brand Personality on Mobile Native Advertising Attitude. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 18(1), 452-464. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.01.452
  13. Gao, Y, Koufaris, M. (2006). Peceptual antecedents of user attitude in electronic commerce' The DATA BASE for Advance of Information Systems. 37, 42-50.
  14. Bauer, R, S. Greyser. (1968). Advertising in America: The consumer view. Boston, MA: Havard University Press.
  15. Nisbett, R, Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcoming of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  16. Grewal, R., Cline T. W. and McKenna A. G. (2003). Early-EntrantAdvantage, Wordof- Mouth Communication, Brand Similarity, and the Consumer Decision-Making Process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(03)70189-2
  17. K. H. Kang (2012). A Study on the Effect of SNS Characteristics on Brand Attitude by Group Intelligence - Focused on Facebook, Master's Degree. Hongik University, Seoul.
  18. Liu, C., Marchewka, J. T. and Yu, C. S. (2005), Beyond Concem-A Privacy-Trust- Behavioral Intention Model of Electronic Commerce. Information and Management, 42, 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.01.003
  19. Bickart, B, Schindler, R. M.(2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.1014
  20. Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075
  21. S. H. Park. (2009). A Study on the Effects of Brand Blog Characteristics on Blog Commitment and Brand Attitude, Master's Degree. Sookmyung Womens University, Seoul.
  22. Choi, Y., Hwang, J, Mcmillan, S.. (2008). Gearing up for mobile advertising: A cross cultural exemination of key factors that drive mobile messages home to consumers. Psychology and Marketing, 25(8), 756-758. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20237
  23. Taylor, D. G, Lewin, J. E., & Strutton. D. (2011). Friends, fans, and followers: Do ads work on social networks? How gender and age shape recepivity. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1). 258-275. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-51-1-258-275
  24. Agarwal, R, Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
  25. Ji Won Lee, In Won Kang and Seong Wun Jeong, (2011). The influence of SNS content quality on users' adoption behavior and WOM, Korea Knowledge Management Society, 12(5).
  26. Lin, Yuping, Shrum I. J. (2002). What is Intractivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person and Situation for the Influence of Intractivity on Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4). 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685
  27. Heeter, C. (1989). Implications of New Intractive Technologies for Conceptualizing Communication, In J. L. Salvaggio & J. Bryant(Eds.), Media Use in the Information Age: Emerging Patterns of Adoption and Consummer Use, 217-235.
  28. Hansong, W. (2000). Principle of Internet Marketing. Cincinneti, OH: South Western College Publishing.
  29. Donath J, Boyed D. (2004). Public Displays of Connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc
  30. Hoffman, D, T. P. Novak. (1996). Marketing in HypermediaComputer-mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal of Marketing , 60(3), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251841
  31. Luarn, P, Huang, P, Chiu, Y. P. and Chen, I. J.(2015). Motivations to engagein word-of-mouth behavior on social network sites. Information Development, 1-13.
  32. J. H. Ryu. (2004). A Study on the Components of Brand Assets: Focusing on the emotional relationship between consumers and brands. PhD. Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul.
  33. Hudson, S., Roth, M. S., Madden, T. J., & Hudson, R.(2015). The effects of social media on emotions, brand relationship quality, and word of mouth: An empirical study of music festival attenders. Tourism Management. 47. 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.001
  34. H. S. Hong. (1996). A Study on WOM Communication of Medical Consumers. Master's Degree. Sejong University, Seoul.
  35. Taylor, S, Todd, P.A.(1995), Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models, Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
  36. Kozinets, R. V., Valck, K., Wojnicki, A.C., and Wilner, S.J.S. (2010), Networked narratives: understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities, Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.74.2.71
  37. Ko, H. Cho. C. H., and Roberts, M. S., (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A structual equation model of intractive advertising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2). 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2005.10639191