DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effets of Steel Fiber Contents on Flexural Creep Behavior of High-Strength Concrete

강섬유 혼입률에 따른 고강도 콘크리트의 휨 크리프 특성

  • Received : 2020.03.19
  • Accepted : 2020.04.23
  • Published : 2020.04.30

Abstract

In this paper, the flexural creep behavior of hooked-end steel fiber reinforced high-strength concrete was evaluated to investigate the steel fiber content influence on long-term behavior of flexural members. An experimental program consisted of nine prismatic beam specimens with dimensions of 150 × 150 × 600mm reinforced with different contents of steel fiber (0, 0.75 and 1.5% at the volume fraction). To introduce flexural creep loading to notched prismatic beam specimens, a four-point bending test setup was used. The sustained load with 40% of the flexural strength was applied by means of a lever system and controlled by a load cell for 90 days. During sustained loading, crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) was monitored. Conventional flexural test after creep tests were carried out to evaluate the residual capacity of each specimen. Test results showed that steel fiber content has a significant effect on the flexural creep behavior of high-strength concrete and long-term flexural load with 40% of flexural strength doesn't generate negative effects on the residual capacity of steel fiber reinforced high-strength concrete.

이 논문에서는 섬유의 혼입량에 따른 휨부재의 장기거동에 대한 영향을 평가하기 위하여 후크형 강섬유로 보강된 고강도 콘크리트의 휨 크리프 거동에 대한 평가가 이루어졌다. 실험은 150 × 150 × 600mm 크기를 갖는 섬유 혼입량(0, 0.75 및 1.5%)을 변수로 하는 6개의 휨 시험체를 대상으로 하였다. 노치를 갖는 휨 시험체에 휨 크리프 하중을 도입하기 위하여 4점 가력 휨 시험장치가 활용되었다. 휨강도의 40%인 크리프 재하하중은 레버 장치를 활용하여 도입되었고 90일 동안 도입된 하중은 로드셀에 의해 제어되었다. 크리프 하중의 도입시, 시험체 중앙부에 설치된 노치의 균열개구변위(CMOD)가 측정되었다. 크리프 시험후 각 시험체 대한 휨시험을 실시하여 각 시험체의 잔여강도를 평가하였다. 이상과 같은 실험결과로부터 섬유 혼입량은 고강도 콘크리트의 휨 크리프 거동에 주요한 영향을 끼치고 휨강도의 40% 범위내의 지속하중은 섬유보강된 고강도 콘크리트의 잔여강도에 부정적인 영향을 끼치지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Benard, E. S. (2004), Creep of cracked fibre reinforced shotcrete panels. In: Shotcrete: More Engineering Developments. Taylor & Francis Group, London, 47-57.
  2. Mangat, P. S., Motamedi, M. (1986), Compression creep behaviour of steel fibre reinforced cement composites. Mater Struct 19(113), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472126
  3. Chern, J. C., Young, C. H. (1989), Compressive creep and shrinkage of steel fibre reinforced concrete. Int J Cem Lingtweight Concr 11(4), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0262-5075(89)90100-0
  4. Arango, S. E., et al. (2012), A test method to characterize flexural creep behaviour of pre-cracked FRC specimens, Experimental mechanics 52(8), 1067-1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9556-2
  5. Zhao, Guanyu, Marco Di Prisco, and Lucie Vandewalle (2012), Experimental research on uni-axial tensile creep behaviour of pre-cracked steel fibre reinforced concrete, 8th RILEM international symposium on fibre reinforced concrete: challenges and opportunities.
  6. Banafemi, Adewumi John, and William Peter Boshoff (2015), Tensile creep of macro-synthetic fibre reinforced concrete (MSFRC) under uni-axial tensile loading, Cement and Concrete Composites 55, 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.08.002
  7. ACI Commitee 318 (2014), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute.
  8. Seok Joon Jang and Hyun Do Yun, et al. (2016), Effects of Curing Age and Fiber Volume Fraction on Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 16(4), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2016.16.4.15
  9. Gwon Young Jeong, et al. (2018), Effects of Steel Fiber Strength and Aspect Ratio on Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Concrete, Korea Concrete Institute, 30(2), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2018.30.2.197
  10. Shariff, Mohammad Najeeb, et al. (2019), Analysis of the ASTM C512 Spring-Loaded CREEP Frame." Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 31(10), 04019234. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002859
  11. Korea Standards Association. "KS F 2405. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Concrete." Korean Standards Association (in Korean) (2010).
  12. EN-14651. (2005). Test method for metallic fibered concrete-Measuring the flexural tensile strength (limit of proportionality (LOP), residual).
  13. Garcia-Taengua, E., Arango, S., Mati-Vargas, J. R. & Serna, P. (2014), Flexural creep of steel fiber reinforced concrete in the cracked state. Construction and Building Materials, 65, 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.139
  14. Fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010 (2013), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 74-150.
  15. Llano-Torre, Aitor, et al. (1993), Compilation and study of a database of tests and results on flexural creep behavior of fibre reinforced concrete specimens, FIB Symposium Proceedings. Leeds, 2015.
  16. Bishop, A. W. (1993), Mechanical Properties of Concrete. Illinois: Portland Cement Association. No. CM-92.
  17. Lim, Dong-Gyun, et al. (2019), Effects of Steel Fiber Properties on Compressive and Flexural Toughness of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete, Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection, 23(3), 43-50.
  18. Chae, Young-Suk, and Ghi-Ho Tae (2012), Tension Creep Model of Recycled PET Polymer Concrete with Flexural Loading, Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 27(5), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2012.27.5.117
  19. Moon, Hyung-Jae, et al. (2018), Suggestion of the Prediction Model for Material Properties and Creep of 60-80MPa Grade High Strength Concrete, The Korea Institute of Building Construction 18(6), 517-525.
  20. Koh, K. T., S. T., Park, J. J., and Ryu, G. S. (2004), A Study on the Improvement of Workability of High Strength Steel Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites. Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 8(3), 141-148.(in Korean)