품질경영학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management)

  • 제48권1호
  • /
  • Pages.107-123
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-1889(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9005(eISSN)
한국품질경영학회 (Korean Society for Quality Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

신재생에너지 발전시설의 입지수용성 결정요인에 관한 연구

The Determinants of Acceptability in Renewable Energy

  • 안성식 (숭실대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 조동혁 (숭실대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 권혁채 (숭실대학교 프로젝트경영학과)
  • Ahn, Seong Shik (Department of Business Administration, Graduate School of Soongsil University) ;
  • Jo, Dong Hyuk (Department of Business Administration, Soongsil University) ;
  • Kwon, Hyeok Chae (Department of Project Management, Graduate School of Soongsil University)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.18
  • 심사 : 2020.01.29
  • 발행 : 2020.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the determinants affecting acceptability in the construction projects of renewable energy generation facilities. Methods: This study used a method of conducting a survey of participants in the Renewable Energy construction project and verifying the hypothesis statistically. Results: The results of this study are as follows; First, Communication, participation and benefit recognition have a positive effect on mutual trust. Second, Benefit perception' has a positive effect on mutuality collaboration. Third, mutual trust have a positive effect on mutual collaboration. Fourth, mutual trust and mutual cooperation had a positive effect on. Finally, risk perception has a moderating effect on the relationship between mutual trust and acceptability, and the relationship between mutual collaboration and acceptability. Conclusion: This study suggests strategic directions for the success of the construction project for renewable energy generation facilities by identifying the determinants of availability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alfasi, N. 2003. Is Public Participation Making Urban Planning More Democratic? The Israeli Experience. Planning Theory&Practice 4(2):185-202.
  2. An, Jungho. 2013. Analysis of Resident Satisfaction Degree in the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project. Ph.D. diss.. The Graduate School of Urban Studies. Hanyang University.
  3. Anderson, J. C., and Narus. J. A. 1990. A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships. The Journal of Marketing 54(1):42-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400304
  4. Azhar, A., Mamunur, R., Nor, A. O., and Syed, S. A. 2014. Perceptions on Renewable Energy Use in Malaysia : Mediating Role of Attitude. Journal Pengurusan 41:123-131. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2014-41-11
  5. Bronfman, Nicolas. C., Jimenez, Raquel. B., Arevalo Pilar. C., and Cifuentes, Luis. A. 2012. Understanding Social Acceptance of Electricity Generation Sources. Energy Police 46:246-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.057
  6. Cao, Yupeng., and Mok, Jin W. 2015 The Study on the Mediating Effect of Risk Perception and Public Trust to the Relationship of the Knowledge Level and the Policy Satisfaction on the Policy Acceptance: The Case of the Korean Nuclear Power Plant Policy Issues. Kookmin Social Science Reviews 29(1):107-128.
  7. Chan, A. P. C., Scott. D., and Chan, A. P. L. 2004. Factors Affecting the Success of a Construction Project. Journal of Construction Engineering Management 130(1):153-155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(153)
  8. Cheong, Moonjoo, Won, Heewook, and Chae, Eunyoung. 2017. Organizational Communication Scale Development & Validation. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 17(9):418-425. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.09.418
  9. Choi, Daejeong, and Park, Donggun. 2002. Relationships among Organizational Environment, Trust, and Cooperation Behavior in Virtualized Organizations. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 15(2):123-149.
  10. Choi, Namhee. 2001. Effect Analysis of the Inter-organizational Cooperation on the Achievement Level of Jointed Goal and Its Simulation Model. Journal of Korean System Dynamics Society 2(1):93-112.
  11. Choi, Yongseon. 2015. A Study on the Determinants of Social Acceptability of Energy Sources: With a Focus on Fossil Energy, Nuclear Energy, and Alternative Energy. Journal of Governmental Studies 21(2):295-330. https://doi.org/10.19067/jgs.2015.21.2.295
  12. Choi, Youncheol. 2003. A Study on Interdependence, Mutual Trust, Cooperation and Effectiveness in Flight Operation Focus on the Relationship between Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers. Ph.D. diss.. The Graduate School. Korea Aerospace University.
  13. Eriksson, O. 2000. Communication Quality: Towards an Intersubjective Understanding of Quality. School of Business and IT, University of Boras.
  14. Gonzalez, Ana. M., Sandoval, Harrison., Acosta, Pilar., and Henao, Felipe. 2016. On the Acceptance and Sustainability of Renewable Energy Projects - A Systems Thinking Perspective. Sustainability 8(11)1171:1-21.
  15. Han, Dongsub, and Kim, Hyeongil. 2011. Risk and Communication: Communication Effects on Social Acceptance of Nuclear Power. Crisisonomy 7(2):1-22.
  16. Hwang, Heejin. 2014. A Study on the Effect of Awareness of NPP on Local Acceptance on NPP : Focusing on local residents on NPP. MA thesis., Department of Public Administration. The Graduate School Seoul National University.
  17. Jung, Jiyong, and Shim, Junseop. 2018. Participation and the Acceptance of Power Lines. Public Policy Review 32(3):129-153. https://doi.org/10.17327/ippa.2018.32.3.006
  18. Jung, Juyong, and Kim, Seoyong. 2014. Exploring Multidimensionality of Trust and Social Acceptance toward Nuclear Power Energy. Korean Public Administration Review 48(4):51-78.
  19. Kim, Jukyong, Kim, Younggon, and Kang, Jesang. 2018. Does Participation of Local Residents in Nuclear Ppower Plants Affect Acceptance? : Focusing on Relationships with Ttrust, Knowledge and Risk Factors. Korean Public Management Review 32(3):331-347. https://doi.org/10.24210/kapm.2018.32.3.016
  20. Kim, Youngjae. 2015. A Study on the Factors of Conflict and Conflict Mitigation Strategies of Local Residents about Unwanted Public Facilities :Focusing on the Conflict Related to Power Transmission Line Construction. Ph.D. diss.. The Graduate School. Pai Chai University.
  21. Lee, Daewoong, Son, Juhee, and Kwon, Giheon. 2018. The Effects of Trust in Government on Risk Perception and the Acceptance of Policies for High-risk Facilities in South Korea. Korean Public Administration Review 52(1):229-257. https://doi.org/10.18333/KPAR.2018.52.1.229
  22. Lee, Doje. 2018. A Study on the Regional Economic Impacts of Military Facilities Relocation. Ph.D. diss.. Department of Defense Acquisition. The Graduate School. Konkuk University.
  23. Lee, Joongun. 2010. A Study on the Conflict Recognition Status of Local Residents and Public Conflict Management Plans. Ph.D. diss.. The Graduate School. Pai Chai University.
  24. Lee, Ryeojung. 2015. The Effects of Communication Quality on Trust and Client Satisfaction: Focused on the Relationship between Travel Agencies and Land Operator. Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 24(6):113-128.
  25. Lee, Taejun, and Chung, Wonjun. 2016. An Empirical Assessment of the Influence of Transparency and Trust in Government on Lay Citizens' Communicative Actions Relative to Conflict of Interest in the Public Service. Journal of Public Relations 20(3):84-112. https://doi.org/10.15814/jpr.2016.20.3.84
  26. Lim, Chaehong, Kim Seoyong. 2014. The Study on Negative Effect of Nuclear Corruption Scandal and the Mechanism of Trust. The Korean Journal of Public Administration 23(3):131-160. https://doi.org/10.22897/KIPAJN.2014.23.3.006
  27. Lim, Dahee, Lee, Sodam, and Kwon Giheon. 2016. Causal Structure of Nuclear Policy Acceptance through Perception on Policy Making Process: Focusing on the Different Group Features Caused by the Nuclear Power Plant Location. Journal of the Korean Association for Policy Studies 25(2):245-281.
  28. Murakami, T. 2017. Social Acceptance of Nuclear Power. ERIA Research Project FY2015(19), Chapter 2:3-22.
  29. Na, Nyunsik. 2018. Influencers of the Conflictual Relationship over Construction of Power Transmission Facilities: Focused on the Case of Dangjin and Miryang Areas. Ph.D. diss.. Department of Real Estate. The Graduate School. Kangwon University.
  30. Park, Cheonhee, and Hong, Eunyoung. 2017. The Relationship between Risk Communication and Nuclear Risk Avoidance Behavior : Focusing on Mediating Effects of Trust in Government. The Korean Public Administration Review 51(4):291-322. https://doi.org/10.18333/kpar.51.4.291
  31. Park, Chongmin, and Bae, Junghyun. 2011. Sources of Trust in Government: Policy Outcomes, Processes and Outputs. Institute of Governmental Studies. Korea University 17(2):117-143.
  32. Park, Insoo. 2019. A Study on the Solution of Location Conflict on Public Facilities by Collaborative Governance. Ph.D. diss.. Department of Public Administration. The Graduate School. Hanyang University.
  33. Park, S., Kim, D., and Boo, J. 2014. The Impact of the Communication Quality on Plant Project Performance. The Korean Society of Project Management 4(1):21-33.
  34. Park, Soohyun. 2013. The Impact of the Communication Quality on Plant Project Performance. MA thesis.. Dept. of Business Administration. The Graduate School. Hanyang University.
  35. Rhee, Junwoong, Moon, Taejoon, and Kim, Eunmee. 2006. Social Capital and Qualities of Communication. Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society 19:135-173.
  36. Shim, Junseob. 2009. Trust in Nuclear Power Plant, Perceived Risk and Benefit, and Acceptance. The Korea Association for Policy Studies 18(4):93-132.
  37. Song, Haeryong, and Kim, Wonje. 2012. Effects of Risk Perception on Risk Attitude and Risk Acceptance of Nuclear Power Plants. The Korea Contents Society 12(6):238-248. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.06.238
  38. Song, Hahzoong, Kim, Jukyong, Go, Daeyoo, and Hwang, Wondong. 2011. An Analysis on Public Acceptance Factors of Nuclear Power Plants in Korea. Korean Local Administration Review 8(2):87-109.
  39. Song, Sangyup, and Shin, Hochul. 2010. The Sequential Effects of the Communication Behaviors on Project Performance in Construction Projects. The Review of Business History 53(0):119-146. https://doi.org/10.22629/kabh.2010.25.1.005
  40. Tanaka. Y. 2004. Major Psychological Factors Determining Public Acceptance of the Siting of Nuclear Facilities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34(6):1147-1165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02000.x
  41. Tomoko, M. 2016. Creating Better Social Acceptance for Electric Power Infrastructure. ERIA Research Project FY 2016(5):1-128.
  42. Visschers, Vivianne. H. M., and Siegrist, Micheal. 2012. How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power-Results of a Longitudinal Study Before and After the Fukushima Disaster. Risk analysis 33(2):333-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x
  43. Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg C., and Kuhicke, C. 2013. The Risk Perception Paradox - Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards. Risk analysis 33(6):1049-1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
  44. Wang Jaesun. 2013. Trust and Acceptance of Nuclear Energy. The Korea Association for Policy Studies 22(3):235-267.
  45. Yang, Rayun. 2016. Risk Perception and Social Construction of Risk in the Neighborhood nearby Nuclear Power Plant : Focused on the cases of Gori, Yeonggwang and Uljin. Ph.D. diss.. Department of Sociology. The Graduate School. Chonnam National University.