DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimal Parameter Design for a Cryogenic Submerged Arc Welding(SAW) Process by Utilizing Stepwise Experimental Design and Multi-dimensional Design Space Analysis

단계적 실험 설계와 다차원 디자인 스페이스 분석 기술을 통한 초저온 SAW 공정의 최적 용접 파라미터 설계

  • Lee, Hyun Jeong (Department of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering, Dong-A University) ;
  • Kim, Young Cheon (Department of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering, Dong-A University) ;
  • Shin, Sangmun (Department of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering, Dong-A University)
  • 이현정 (동아대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 김영천 (동아대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 신상문 (동아대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2019.09.17
  • Accepted : 2019.12.16
  • Published : 2020.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: The primary objective of this research is to develop the optimal operating conditions as well as their associated design spaces for a Cryogenic Submerged Arc Welding(SAW) process by improving its quality and productivity simultaneously. Methods: In order to investigate functional relationships among quality characteristics and their associated control factors of an SAW process, a stepwise design of experiment(DoE) method is proposed in this paper. Based on the DoE results, not only a multi-dimensional design space but also a safe operating space and normal acceptable range(NAR) by integrating statistical confidence intervals were demonstrated. In addition, the optimal operating conditions within the proposed NAR can be obtained by a robust optimal design method. Results: This study provides a customized stepwise DoE method (i.e., a sequential set of DoE such as a factorial design and a central composite design) for Cryogenic SAW process and its statistical analysis results. DoE results can then provide both the main and interaction effects of input control factors and the functional relationships between the input factors and their associated output responses. Maximizing both the product quality with high impact strength and the productivity with minimum processing times simultaneously in a case study, we proposed a design space which can provide both acceptable productivity and quality levels and NARs of input control factors. In order to confirm the optimal factor settings and the proposed NARs, validation experiments were performed. Conclusion: This research may provide significant contributions and applications to many SAW problems by preparing a standardization of the functional relationship between the input factors and their associated output response. Moreover, the proposed design space based on DoE and NAR methods can simultaneously consider a number of quality characteristics including tradeoff between productivity and quality levels.

Keywords

References

  1. An, H, Lee, H, Park, Y, Eun, S., and Kang, C. 2014. Effect of Heat Input of Outside Weld on Low Temperature Toughness of Inside Weld for Multiple Electrode SA Welded API 5L X70 with Sour Gas Resistance. Journal of Welding and Joining 32(1):93-101. https://doi.org/10.5781/JWJ.2014.32.1.93
  2. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee on Pressure Vessels. 2017. BPVC Section II-Materials-Part A-Ferrous Materials Specification. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
  3. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee on Pressure Vessels. 2017. BPVC Section IX-Welding, Brazing, and Fusing Qualifications. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
  4. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee on Pressure Vessels. 2017. BPVC Section VIII-Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels Division 1. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
  5. Byun, J. H., Seo, P. G., Shin, J. E., Lee, L. G., and Yeom, J. H. 2014. A Case Study of Developing Rapid-hardening Ultra-low Temterature Adhesives by Mixture Design and Multiple Response Optimization. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 42(4):757-768. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2014.42.4.757
  6. Choi, G. 2016. Development of New Experimental Region Screening Methods to Generating a Safe Operating space on Pharmaceutical Quality by Design(QbD) Systems. MS diss. Dong-A University.
  7. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. 2009. Pharmaceutical Development Q8 (R2). International conference of harmonisation.
  8. Jeong, J. 2017. Study on an Input Variable Design Sapce Identification Method by Using Inverse Regression Approaches. MS diss. Dong-A University.
  9. Jung, B. 2011. A Study on Toughness in Heat Affected Zone with Various Welding Heat Input in High Strength Steel for Low Temperature Service. MS diss. University of Ulsan.
  10. Kim, Y. 2018. Development of Rubust Parameter Design and Optimization Methodologies for a Cryogenic Submerged Arc Welding Process. MS diss. Dong-A University.
  11. Korean Food and Drug Administration(KFDA). 2016. Technical Report of Statistical Methods and Tools Development to Apply Pharmaceutical QbD.
  12. Le, T. H., and Shin, S. 2018. A Literature Review on RSM-based Robust Parameter Design (RPD): Experimental Design, Estimation Modeling, and Optimization Methods. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 46(1):39-74. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2018.46.1.039
  13. Lee, D. H., Lee, M. L., and Bae, S. J. 2015. A Study on Optimal Operating Conditions for an Electronic Device Alignment System by Using Design of Experiments. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 43(13):453-466. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2015.43.3.453
  14. Lee, S. 2012. Submerged Arc Welding Impact on the Welding Conditions. Kyungil University.
  15. Lin, D. K. J., and Tu, W. 1995. Dual Response Surface Optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 27:34-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1995.11979556
  16. Robinson, T. J., Borror, C. M., and Myers, R. H. 2004. Robust Parameter Design: A Review. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 20:81-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.602
  17. Vining, G. G., and Myers, R. H. 1990. Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach. Journal of Quality Technology 22:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1990.11979204
  18. Weman, K. 2012. Welding Processes Handbook. Cambridge: Woodhead.
  19. Yu, L. X. 2008. Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: Product and Process Development, Understanding, and Control. Pharmaceutical Research 25(4):781-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-007-9511-1