Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Respiratory Problems in Workers Associated with Intensive Poultry Facilities in Pakistan

  • Received : 2019.03.11
  • Accepted : 2019.12.30
  • Published : 2020.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The poultry industry in Pakistan has flourished since the 1960s; however, there are scarce data regarding the impact of occupational exposure on the pulmonary health of farm workers in terms of years working in the industry. The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of poultry environment on the health of occupationally exposed poultry farmers in countries of warm climatic regions, such as Pakistan. This study will also show the effect of exposure to poultry facilities on the health of poultry farmers in the context of low-income countries with a relatively inadequate occupational exposure risk management. Materials and methods: The lung function capacity of 79 poultry workers was measured using a spirometer. Along with spirometry, a structured questionnaire was also administrated to obtain information about age, height, weight, smokers/nonsmokers, years of working experience, and pulmonary health of farm workers. The workers who were directly involved in the care and handling of birds in these intensive facilities were considered and divided into four groups based on their years of working experience: Group I (3-10 months), Group II (1-5 years), Group III (6-10 years), and Group IV (more than 11 years). The forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the FEV1/FVC ratio were considered to identify lung function abnormalities. Statistical analysis was carried out using independent sample t test, Chi-square test, Pearson's correlation, and linear regression. Results: Based on the performed spirometry, 68 (86 %) of workers were found normal and healthy, whereas 11 (14 %) had a mild obstruction. Of the 11 workers with mild obstruction, the highest number with respect to the total was in Group IV (more than 11 years of working experience) followed by Group III and Group II. Most of the workers were found healthy, which seems to be because of the healthy survivor effect. For the independent sample t test, a significant difference was noticed between healthy and nonhealthy farmers, whereas Chi-square test showed a significant association with height, drugs, and working experience. Linear regression that was stratified by respiratory symptoms showed for workers with symptoms, regression models for all spirometric parameters (FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC) have better predictive power or R square value than those of workers without symptoms. Conclusion: These findings suggest that lung function capacity was directly related to years of working experience. With increasing number of working years, symptoms of various respiratory problems enhanced in the poultry workers. It should be noted that most of the poultry workers were healthy and young, the rationale being that there is a high turnover rate in this profession. The mobility in this job and our finding of 86% of the healthy workers in the present study also proposed healthy worker survivor effect.

Keywords

References

  1. GOP (Government of Pakistan). Economic survey of Pakistan. Ministry of Finance. 2014. http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey/chapters_14/02_Agriculture.pdf.
  2. Borhan MS, Mukhtar S, Capareda S, Rahman S. Greenhouse gas emissions from housing and manure management systems at confined livestock operations. Waste Manag.-An Integrated Vis Rijeka (Croatia) In Tech 2012:259-96.
  3. Cambra-Lopez M, Aarnink AJ, Zhao Y, Calvet S, Torres AG. Airborne particulate matter from livestock production systems: a review of an air pollution problem. Environ Pollu 2010;158(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.011
  4. Casey KD, Bicudo JR, Schmidt DR, Singh A, Gay SW, Gates RS, et al. Air quality and emissions from livestock and poultry production/waste management systems; 2006. p. 1-40.
  5. Gerber P, Opio C, Steinfeld H. Poultry production and the environment-a review. Animal production and health division, food and agriculture organization of the united nations, VialedelleTerme di Caracalla, vol. 153. Italy: Room; 2007.
  6. Naseem S, King AJ. Ammonia production in poultry houses can affect health of humans, birds, and the environment-techniques for its reduction during poultry production. Environ Sci Poll Res 2018;25(16):15269-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2018-y
  7. Magzamen S, Schaeffer JW, Poole JA, VanDyke A, Anderson K, Bradford M, et al. Associations of cross-shift changes in pulmonary function and endotoxin exposure among dairy workers. In A105. Dust and particulate matter exposure. Am Thorac Soc 2018;197(1). 2572-2572.
  8. Omland O. Exposure and respiratory health in farming in temperate zones-a review of the literature. Ann Agric Environ Medi 2002;9(2):119-36.
  9. Oppliger A, Charriere N, Droz PO, Rinsoz T. Exposure to bioaerosols in poultry houses at different stages of fattening; use of real-time PCR for airborne bacterial quantification. Ann Occup Hyg 2008;52(5):405-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/men021
  10. Chang CW, Chung H, Huang CF, Su HJJ. Exposure of workers to airborne microorganisms in open-air swine houses. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67(1):155-61. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.1.155-161.2001
  11. Hartung J, Schulz J. Occupational and environmental risks caused by bioaerosols in and from farm animal houses. Agric Engin Internation CIGR J 2011;13(2):1-8.
  12. Burch JB, Svendsen E, Siegel PD, Wagner SE, Von Essen S, Keefe T, et al. Endotoxin exposure and inflammation markers among agricultural workers in Colorado and Nebraska. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2009;73(1):5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390903248604
  13. Donham KJ, Cumro D, Reynolds SJ, Merchant JA. Dose-response relationships between occupational aerosol exposures and cross-shift declines of lung function in poultry workers: recommendations for exposure limits. J Occup Environ Medi 2000;42(3):260-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200003000-00006
  14. Karjalainen A, Kurppa K, Virtanen S, Keskinen H, Nordman H. Incidence of occupational asthma by occupation and industry in Finland. Am J Ind Med 2000;37(5):451-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(200005)37:5<451::AID-AJIM1>3.0.CO;2-U
  15. RadonK, Danuser B, Iversen M, Jorres R, Monso E, Opravil U, Nowak D. Respiratory symptoms in European animal farmers. Eur Respir J 2001;17(4):747-54. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.01.17407470
  16. Viegas S, Caetano LA, Korkalainen M, Faria T, Pacifico C, Carolino E, Viegas C. Cytotoxic and inflammatory potential of air samples from occupational settings with exposure to organic dust. Toxics 2017;5(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics5010001
  17. Whyte RT. Occupational exposure of poultry stockmen in current barn systems for egg production in the United Kingdom. Bri Poult Sci 2002;43(3):364-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120103639
  18. Willson PJ, Khozani TT, Juurlink BHJ, Senthilselvan A, Rennie DC, Gerdts V, et al. In vitro production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha by human monocytes stimulated with lipopolysaccharide is positively correlated with increased blood monocytes after exposure to a swine barn. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 2008;71(21):1401-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390802241015
  19. Wilson S. The prevalence of chronic respiratory disease in the industrial era the United States, 1895-1910. In: Health and labor force participation over the life cycle: evidence from the past. University of Chicago Press; 2003. p. 147-80.
  20. Radon K, Weber C, Iversen M, Danuser B, Pedersen S, Nowak D. Exposure assessment and lung function in pig and poultry farmers. Occup Environ Med 2001;58(6):405-10. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.6.405
  21. Ramos AK, Fuentes A, Carvajal-Suarez M. Self-reported occupational injuries and perceived occupational health problems among latino immigrant swine confinement workers in Missouri. J Environ Pub Health 2018:1-8.
  22. Rimac D, Macan J, Varnai VM, Vucemilo M, Matkovic K, Prester L, et al. Exposure to poultry dust and health effects in poultry workers: impact of mould and mite allergens. Int Arc Occup Environ Health 2010;83(1):9-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0487-5
  23. Viegas S, Faisca VM, Dias H, Clerigo A, Carolino E, Viegas C. Occupational exposure to poultry dust and effects on the respiratory system in workers. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 2013;76(4-5):230-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2013.757199
  24. Taluja MK, Gupta V, Sharma G, Arora JS. Prevalence of symptoms (respiratory and non-respiratory) among poultry farm workers in India. Am J Physiol 2018;8(2):40-6.
  25. Borlee F, Yzermans CJ, van Dijk CE, Heederik D, Smit LA. Increased respiratory symptoms in COPD patients living in the vicinity of livestock farms. Eur Respi J 2015;46(6):1605-14. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00265-2015
  26. Van Dijk CE, Garcia-Aymerich J, Carsin AE, Smit LA, Borlee F, Heederik DJ, et al. Risk of exacerbations in COPD and asthma patients living in the neighbourhood of livestock farms: observational study using longitudinal data. Int J Hyg Environ Med 2016;219(3):278-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.01.002
  27. Kasaeinasab A, Jahangiri M, Karimi A, Tabatabaei HR, Safari S. Respiratorydisorders among workers in slaughterhouses. Saf Health Work 2017;8(1):84-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2016.04.002
  28. Rylander R, Carvalheiro MF. Airways inflammation among workers in poultry houses. Int Arc Occup Environ Health 2006;79(6):487-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-005-0072-5
  29. Hamid A, Ahmad AS, Khan N. Respiratory and other health risks among poultry-farm workers and evaluation of management practices in poultry farms. Braz J Poult Sci 2018;20(1):111-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0513
  30. Harmse JL, Engelbrecht JC, Bekker JL. Exposure of poultry processors to microbial agents in poultry abattoirs. Occup Health South Africa 2017;23(6):18-26.
  31. Townsend MC, Lockey JE, Velez H. ACOEM position statement.Spirometry in the occupational setting. J Occup Environ Med 2000;42(3):228-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200003000-00003
  32. Ma YN, Wang J, Dong GH, Liu MM, Wang D, Liu YQ, Zhao Y, Ren WH, Lee YL, Zhao YD, He QC. Predictive equations using regression analysis of pulmonary function for healthy children in Northeast China. PLoS One 2013;8(5):e63875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063875
  33. De-Alencar MDC, Naas IDA, Gontijo LA. Respiratory risks in broiler production workers. Braz J Poult Sci 2004;6(1):23-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2004000100004
  34. Adeoye SA, Awotunde MJ, Arowolo OO, Sogunle MO, Adebayo MR, Popoola OT. Occupational health problems confronting poultry farm workers in ogun and oyo state, Nigeria. J Sustain Develop 2017;12(1):28-35.
  35. Basinas I, Cronin G, Hogan V, Sigsgaard T, Hayes J, Coggins AM. Exposure to inhalable dust, endotoxin, and total volatile organic carbons on dairy farms using manual and automated feeding systems. Ann Work Expo Health 2017;61(3):344-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxw023
  36. Kimbell-Dunn MR, Fishwick RD, Bradshaw L, Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen R, Pearce N. Work-related respiratory symptoms in New Zealand farmers. Am J Ind Med 2001;39(3):292-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0274(200103)39:3<292::AID-AJIM1017>3.0.CO;2-F
  37. Kirychuk SP, Senthilselvan A, Dosman JA, Juorio V, Feddes JJ, Willson P, et al. Respiratory symptoms and lung function in poultry confinement workers in Western Canada. Can Respir J 2003;10(7):375-80. https://doi.org/10.1155/2003/109679
  38. Kearney GD, Gallagher B, Shaw R. Respiratory protection behavior and respiratory indices among poultry house workers on small, family-owned farms in North Carolina: a pilot project. J Agro Medi 2016;21(2):136-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2016.1143429
  39. Kirkhorn SR, Schenker MB. Current health effects of agricultural work: respiratory disease, cancer, reproductive effects, musculoskeletal injuries, and pesticideerelated illnesses. J Agric Saf Health 2002;8(2):199. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.8432
  40. Rees D, Nelson G, Kielkowski D, Wasserfall C, da Costa A. Respiratory health and immunological profile of poultry workers. South Afr Med. J. 1998;88(9):1110-7.
  41. BorghettiC, Magarolas R, Badorrey I, RadonK,Morera J, Monso E. Sensitization and occupational asthma in poultry workers. Medi Clin 2002;118(7):251-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-7753(02)72352-X
  42. Beelen R, Hoek G, van den Brandt PA, Goldbohm RA, Fischer P, Schouten LJ, et al. Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and lung cancer risk. Epidemiol 2008;19(5):702-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e318181b3ca
  43. Brunekreef B, Beelen RMJ, Hoek G, Schouten LJ, Bausch-Goldbohm S, Fischer P, Jerrett M. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in The Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study. Res Rep Health Eff. Inst 2009;139(1):5-71.
  44. Kristensen HH, Wathes CM. Ammonia and poultry welfare: a review. World Poult Sci J 2000;56(3):235-45. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20000018
  45. Ritz CW, Mitchell BW, Fairchild BD, Czarick III M, Worley JW. Improving inhouse air quality in broiler production facilities using an electrostatic space charge system. J Appl Poult Res 2006;15(2):333-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/15.2.333
  46. Rousset N, Brame C, Galliot P, Cleuziou AC, Goizin G, Hassouna M, et al. Dust concentrations, and dust exposure of workers in the air of poultry houses during specific working task. France: 12e Journees de la Recherch e Avicoleet Palmipedes a Foie Gras Tours; 2017. p. 928-33.
  47. Tandon S, Gupta S, Singh S, Kumar A. Respiratory abnormalities among occupationally exposed, non-smoking brick kiln workers from Punjab, India. Int J Occup Environ Med 2017;8(3):1036-166.
  48. Campbell SJ, Kauffman P, Parinandi N, Kotha S, Gurney T, Varikuti S, Satoskar A. Indoor airborne dust/particulate matter causes occupational respiratory disease: novel lipidocentric mechanism of airway inflammation. In: InB60. Environmental dust and particulates in airway disease. American Thoracic Society; 2017 (pp. A3893-A3893).
  49. Stoleski S, Minov J, Mijakoski D, Karadzinska-Bislimovska J. Chronic respiratory symptoms and lung function in agricultural workers-influence of exposure duration and smoking. Mac J Med Sci 2015;3(1):158. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2015.014
  50. Abdullah NA, Hashim Z. Metal working fluids (MWF) aerosol in an occupational setting: association with the respiratory symptoms and lung functions among machinists. Asia Pac Environ Occup Health J 2018;4(1):31-9.
  51. Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Jindal SK. Comparison of Indian reference equations for spirometry interpretation. Respirology 2007;12(5):763-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01123.x
  52. Collen J, Greenburg D, Holley A, King CS, Hnatiuk O. Discordance in spirometric interpretationsusing three commonly usedreference equations vs national health and nutrition examination study III. Chest 2008;134(5):1009-16. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-0614
  53. Collen J, Greenburg D, Holley A, King C, Roop S, Hnatiuk O. Racial discordance in spirometry comparing four commonly used reference equations to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study III. Respir Med 2010;104(5):705-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2009.11.001
  54. Nku CO, Peters EJ, Eshiet AI, Bisong SA, Osim EE. Prediction formulae for lung function parameters in females of south eastern Nigeria. Niger J Physiol Sci 2006;21(1-2):43-7.
  55. Rabbani U, Nafees AA. Comparing lung functionof textile workers with the healthy pakistani population. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2015;27(2):434-40.
  56. Ajetomobi JO, Ajagbe FA, Adewoye JO. Occupational hazards and productivity of poultry farmers in Osun state of Nigeria. Int J Poult Sci 2010;9(4):330-3. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.330.333
  57. Buckley JP, Keil AP, McGrath LJ, Edwards JK. Evolving methods for inference in the presence of healthy worker survivor bias. Epidemiol 2015;26(2):204-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000217

Cited by

  1. The Role of Climate Control in Monogastric Animal Farming: The Effects on Animal Welfare, Air Emissions, Productivity, Health, and Energy Use vol.11, pp.20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11209549
  2. Risk of Heat‐Related Mortality, Disease, Accident, and Injury Among Korean Workers: A National Representative Study From 2002 to 2015 vol.5, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021gh000516
  3. Size-segregated physicochemical properties of inhalable particulate matter in a tunnel-ventilated layer house in China vol.204, pp.no.pb, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112064