Archives of Plastic Surgery

  • 제47권1호
  • /
  • Pages.9-14
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2234-6163(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6171(eISSN)
대한성형외과학회 (Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Anthropometric analysis of the eyeball exposure area in Koreans

  • Park, Ki Soo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine) ;
  • Ka, Soon Il (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Dae Hwan (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.08
  • 심사 : 2020.01.09
  • 발행 : 2020.01.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background Eyelids vary in morphology and structure depending on age, sex, and race. Usually, one-dimensional measurements are used to evaluate blepharoplasty outcomes. However, in recent years, three- or four- directional enlargements of the eyelid have been used for blepharoplasty in Asian patients, and the outcomes of techniques such as lateral canthoplasty or canthotomy and medial epicanthoplasty with increased scleral area cannot be analyzed using marginal reflex distance 1 or the area of corneal exposure. Therefore, we describe the use of a measurement method based on the eyeball exposure area (EEA). Methods To obtain normal EEA values by age and sex, 320 individuals were recruited. The participants were divided into eight age groups (n=40 in each group: female subjects, n=20; male subjects, n=20): 10-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89 years. The EEA value was obtained by dividing the exposed area by the total eyeball area. The normal EEA values and differences in EEA according to age and sex were calculated. Results The mean EEA values for male and female subjects were 66.86% ±9.20% and 71.48%±10.48%, respectively. In each age group, the EEA values of females were higher than those of males. EEA decreased significantly with age in both male and female subjects (P<0.05). Conclusions We determined normal EEA values according to age and sex. EEA can be used as an indicator of the outcome of blepharoplasty.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Park DH, Choi WS, Yoon SH, et al. Anthropometry of Asian eyelids by age. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1405-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000304608.33432.67
  2. Barretto RL, Mathog RH. Orbital measurement in black and white populations. Laryngoscope 1999;109(7 Pt 1):1051-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199907000-00007
  3. Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Litsas L. Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000;24:179-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002660010029
  4. Price KM, Gupta PK, Woodward JA, et al. Eyebrow and eyelid dimensions: an anthropometric analysis of African Americans and Caucasians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124: 615-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addc98
  5. Baek SW, Kim JH, Park SH, et al. Anthropometric analysis of palpebral fissure. J Korean Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg 1995; 1:221-6.
  6. Park DH, Jung JM, Song CH. Anthropometric analysis of levator muscle function. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1181-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000304236.11519.09
  7. Park K, Guo Z, Park DH. Measurement of the area of corneal exposure using digital image and its application during assessment for blepharoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018;42: 208-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0980-2
  8. Song WS, Kim YH, Lee SJ. Morphologic study of upper eyelid contour and functional evaluation of levator palpebrae superioris muscle in adult and young people. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2001;42:1523-9.
  9. Seo HY, Ahn HB. Morphological changes of the eyelid according to age. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2009;50:1461-7. https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2009.50.10.1461
  10. Park JJ, Hwang JH, Kim ES, et al. The relationship between the iris diameter, palpebral fissure width and intercanthal distance for beautiful eye. J Korean Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007;13:33-8.
  11. Lee JS, Kim HK, Kim YW. Anthropometric analysis of the attractive and normal faces in Korean female. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;31:526-31.
  12. Song CH, Ahn KY, Han DC, et al. The age-related anthropometric analysis of eyelids and orbits in Koreans. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;26:1131-7.
  13. Milbratz GH, Garcia DM, Guimaraes FC, et al. Multiple radial midpupil lid distances: a simple method for lid contour analysis. Ophthalmology 2012;119:625-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.039
  14. Bae TH, Kim JC, Kim WS, et al. A photogrammetic study of the eyes in Korean youths. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;34:37-43.
  15. Song WC, Park SH, Koh KS. Metric and non-metric characteristics of Korean eyes using satadardized photographs. Korean J Phys Anthropol 2002;15:95-107. https://doi.org/10.11637/kjpa.2002.15.2.95
  16. van den Bosch WA, Leenders I, Mulder P. Topographic anatomy of the eyelids, and the effects of sex and age. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:347-52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.3.347
  17. Duke-Elder S, Wybar KC. System of ophthalmology: the anatomy of the visual system, vol II. St. Louis: Mosby; 1961.
  18. Direk FK, Deniz M, Uslu AI, et al. Anthropometric analysis of orbital region and age-related changes in adult women. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:1579-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002814