DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of irregular marital cohabitation on quality of life and sexual dysfunction in infertile men from upper Egypt

  • Taha, Emad Abdelrhim (Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University) ;
  • Sabry, Mohamed (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University) ;
  • Abdelrahman, Islam Fathy Soliman (Department of Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University) ;
  • Elktatny, Hossam (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Al Azhar Assiut University) ;
  • Hosny, Ahmed (Department of Dermatology and Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University)
  • Received : 2019.06.26
  • Accepted : 2019.10.04
  • Published : 2020.03.31

Abstract

Objective: Irregular patterns of marital cohabitation are a common problem in upper Egypt due to employment conditions. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of irregular marital cohabitation on the quality of life and sexual function of infertile men. Methods: In total, 208 infertile men were included and divided into two groups. The first group included 134 infertile men with an irregular pattern of marital cohabitation and the second group included 74 infertile men with a regular pattern of marital cohabitation. All subjects were assessed through a clinical evaluation, conventional semen analysis, the fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) questionnaire, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score, and the premature ejaculation diagnostic tool (PMEDT). Results: The two groups were compared in terms of conventional semen parameters, FertiQoL, IIEF-5 score, and PMEDT. Infertile men with an irregular pattern of marital cohabitation had significantly lower subscale and total FertiQoL and IIEF-5 scores. Additionally, they had significantly higher PMEDT scores. Erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation were more common in them than in infertile men with a regular pattern of marital cohabitation. Conclusion: Irregular patterns of marital cohabitation had an adverse effect on quality of life and sexual function in infertile men.

Keywords

References

  1. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1506-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem046
  2. Chachamovich JR, Chachamovich E, Ezer H, Fleck MP, Knauth D, Passos EP. Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2010;31:101-10. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2010.481337
  3. Maroufizadeh S, Karimi E, Vesali S, Omani Samani R. Anxiety and depression after failure of assisted reproductive treatment among patients experiencing infertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;130:253-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.044
  4. Lotti F, Corona G, Castellini G, Maseroli E, Fino MG, Cozzolino M, et al. Semen quality impairment is associated with sexual dysfunction according to its severity. Hum Reprod 2016;31:2668-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew246
  5. Strzemecka J, Pencula M, Owoc A, Szot W, Strzemecka E, Jablonski M, et al. The factor harmful to the quality of human life: shiftwork. Ann Agric Environ Med 2013;20:298-300.
  6. Karabulut A, Demirtas O, Sonmez S, Karaca N, Gok S. Assessing factors associated with infertility using a couple-based approach. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;137:96-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12101
  7. Teskereci G, Oncel S. Effect of lifestyle on quality of life of couples receiving infertility treatment. J Sex Marital Ther 2013;39:476-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2012.665817
  8. Ghafar AA. Egyptians in revolt: the political economy of labor and student mobilizations 1919-2011. New York: Routledge; 2017.
  9. Althof SE, McMahon CG, Waldinger MD, Serefoglu EC, Shindel AW, Adaikan PG, et al. An update of the International Society of Sexual Medicine's Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Premature Ejaculation (PE). Sex Med 2014;2:60-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/sm2.28
  10. Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Fertil Steril 2011;96:409-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.046
  11. World Health Organization. Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
  12. Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Hum Reprod 2011;26:2084-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der171
  13. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999;11:319-26. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900472
  14. Shamloul R, Ghanem H, Abou-zeid A. Validity of the Arabic version of the sexual health inventory for men among Egyptians. Int J Impot Res 2004;16:452-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901248
  15. Symonds T, Perelman MA, Althof S, Giuliano F, Martin M, May K, et al. Development and validation of a premature ejaculation diagnostic tool. Eur Urol 2007;52:565-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.028
  16. Smith NK, Madeira J, Millard HR. Sexual function and fertility quality of life in women using in vitro fertilization. J Sex Med 2015;12:985-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12824
  17. Valsangkar S, Bodhare T, Bele S, Sai S. An evaluation of the effect of infertility on marital, sexual satisfaction indices and health-related quality of life in women. J Hum Reprod Sci 2011;4:80-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.86088
  18. Domar AD, Gross J, Rooney K, Boivin J. Exploratory randomized trial on the effect of a brief psychological intervention on emotions, quality of life, discontinuation, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril 2015;104:440-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.009
  19. Goker A, Yanikkerem E, Birge O, Kuscu NK. Quality of life in Turkish infertile couples and related factors. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2018;21:195-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2017.1322223
  20. Keramat A, Masoomi SZ, Mousavi SA, Poorolajal J, Shobeiri F, Hazavhei SM. Quality of life and its related factors in infertile couples. J Res Health Sci 2014;14:57-63.
  21. Namavar Jahromi B, Mansouri M, Forouhari S, Poordast T, Salehi A. Quality of life and its influencing factors of couples referred to an infertility center in Shiraz, Iran. Int J Fertil Steril 2018;11:293-7.
  22. Hsu PY, Lin MW, Hwang JL, Lee MS, Wu MH. The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) questionnaire in Taiwanese infertile couples. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2013;52:204-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2013.04.009
  23. Wibowo E, Johnson TW, Wassersug RJ. Infertility, impotence, and emasculation: psychosocial contexts for abandoning reproduction. Asian J Androl 2016;18:403-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.173937
  24. Alesi R. Infertility and its treatment: an emotional roller coaster. Aust Fam Physician 2005;34:135-8.
  25. Peterson BD, Pirritano M, Block JM, Schmidt L. Marital benefit and coping strategies in men and women undergoing unsuccessful fertility treatments over a 5-year period. Fertil Steril 2011;95:1759-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.125
  26. Kocelak P, Chudek J, Naworska B, Bak-Sosnowska M, Kotlarz B, Mazurek M, et al. Psychological disturbances and quality of life in obese and infertile women and men. Int J Endocrinol 2012;2012:236217. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/236217
  27. Milazzo A, Mnatzaganian G, Elshaug AG, Hemphill SA, Hiller JE; Astute Health Study Group. Depression and anxiety outcomes associated with failed assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0165805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165805

Cited by

  1. Therapeutic Potential of Date Palm against Human Infertility: A Review vol.11, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11060408