Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Feasibility of combinational burnable poison pins for 24-month cycle PWR reload core

  • Dandi, Aiman (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, MinJae (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Myung Hyun (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2019.03.24
  • Accepted : 2019.07.26
  • Published : 2020.02.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Burnable Poison (BP) is very important for all Light Water Reactors in order to hold-down the initial excess reactivity and to control power peaking. The use of BP is even more essential as the excess reactivity increases significantly with a longer operation cycle. In this paper a feasibility study was conducted in order to investigate the benefits of a new combinational BP concept designed for 24-month cycle PWR core. The reference designs in this study are based on the two Korean fuel assemblies; 17 × 17 Westinghouse (WH) design and 16 × 16 Combustion Engineering (CE) design. A modification was done on these two designs to extend their cycle length from 18 months into 24 months. DeCART2D-MASTER code system was used to perform assembly and core calculations for both designs. A preliminary test was conducted in order to choose the best BP suitable for 24-month as a representative for single BP concept. The comparison between the results of two concepts (combinational BP concept and single BP concept) showed that the combinational BP concept can replace the single BP concept with better performance on holding down the initial excess reactivity without violating the design limitations.

Keywords

References

  1. Jeffery A. Brown, Ho Q. Lam, Hybrid IFBA Gad assembly designs for long PWR cycles, in: Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting, Ramada Plaza Jeju, Jeju Island, Korea, 2017. Sepp. 10-14, 2017.
  2. J. Secker, J. Brown, Westinghouse PWR burnable absorber evolution and usage, in: ANS Winter Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2010. Nov. 7-11, 2010.
  3. H. Yu, M.-S. Yahya, Y. Kim, A reduced-boron OPR1000 core based on the BigT burnable absorber, Nucl. Eng. Technol. (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2015.12.010.
  4. F. Franceschini, B. Petrovic, Fuel with advavced burnable absorbers design for the IRIS reactor core: combined erbia and IFBA, Ann. Nucl. Energy 36 (2009) 1201-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.04.005
  5. J. Choe, H.C. Shin, D. Lee, New burnable absorber for long-cycle low boron operation of PWRs, Ann. Nucl. Energy 88 (2016) 272-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.11.011
  6. Young Kim Jang, Kyeong Lak Jeon, In-reactor irradiation performances of advanced fuels, $ACE7^{TM}$, for Westinghouse type nuclear power plants, Trans. Korean Soc. Mech. Eng. Spring Meet. 5 (2010) 343-344.
  7. Hyungjin Kim, Gyeong-Uk Kang, Chun-Hyung Cho, Comparisons of peak cladding temperature and effective thermal conductivity: CFD simulation on PWR spent fuel assemblies - 16278, in: WM2016 Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, March 6 - 10, 2016.
  8. Kyu-Tae Kim, Young-Ki Jang, Jae-Ik Kim, In-reactor performance of an advanced PWR fuel, PLUS7, for OPR1000s in Korea, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 45 (8) (2008) 836-849. https://doi.org/10.3327/jnst.45.836
  9. B.O. Cho, H.G. Joo, J.Y. Cho, J.S. Song, S.Q. Zee, MASTER-3.0: Multi-Purpose Analyzer for Static and Transient Effects of Reactors, KAERI/TR-2061/2002, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2002.
  10. J.Y. Cho, J.C. Lee, K.H. Lee, S.Y. Park, H.J. Park, H.Y. Kim, K.Y. Kim, H.J. Jung, J.S. Song, S.Q. Zee, C.K. Jo, H.C. Lee, DeCART2D v1.0 User's Manual, KAERI/TR-5116/2013, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2013.
  11. T. Cardinaels, J. Hertog, B. Vos, L. de Tollenaere, C. Delafoy, M. Verwerft, Dopant solubility and lattice contraction in gadolinia and gadolinia-chromia doped UO2 fuels, J. Nucl. Mater. 424 (1-3) (2012) 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.02.014
  12. C.E. Sanders, J.C. Wagner, R.Y. Lee, Study of the Effect of Integral Burnable Absorbers for PWR Burnup Credit, NUREG/CR-6760, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2002. ORNL/TM-2000-321.
  13. J.C. Wagner, C.V. Parks, R.Y. Lee, Parametric Study of the Effect of Burnable Poison Rods for PWR Burnup Credit, NUREG/CR-6761, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2002. ORNL/TM-2000/373.
  14. P.M. O'Leary, M.L. Pitts, Effects of burnable absorbers on PWR spent nuclear fuel, in: WM'01 Conference, Tucson, AZ, USA, 2001. February 25-March 1.
  15. J.P.A. Renier, M.L. Grossbeck, Development of Improved Burnable Poisons for Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2001. ORNL/TM-2001/238.
  16. Aiman Dandi, MinJae Lee, Myung Hyun Kim, Soon Ki Kim, Sang Rin Shon, Combination of burnable Poison pins for 24 months cycle PWR reload core, in: Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Jeju, Korea, 2018. May 17-18, (2018).
  17. MinJae Lee, Aiman Dandi, Myung Hyun Kim, Soon Ki Kim, Sang Rin Shon, The combinational use of burnable Poison pins for 24 Months cycle PWR, in: Transactions of the American Nuclear Society Summer Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2018. June 17-21, (2018.

Cited by

  1. Monte Carlo Investigation of the UK’s First EPR Nuclear Reactor Startup Core Using Serpent vol.13, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195168
  2. AP1000 fuel assembly reactivity flattening using a novel candidate composite burnable absorber vol.136, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02214-0