Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제35권4호
  • /
  • Pages.475-494
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Experimental investigation of shear connector behaviour in composite beams with metal decking

  • Qureshi, Jawed (School of Architecture, Computing and Engineering (ACE), University of East London) ;
  • Lam, Dennis (School of Engineering, University of Bradford)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.30
  • 심사 : 2020.03.05
  • 발행 : 2020.05.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Presented are experimental results from 24 full-scale push test specimens to study the behaviour of composite beams with trapezoidal profiled sheeting laid transverse to the beam axis. The tests use a single-sided horizontal push test setup and are divided into two series. First series contained shear loading only and the second had normal load besides shear load. Four parameters are studied: the effect of wire mesh position and number of its layers, placing a reinforcing bar at the bottom flange of the deck, normal load and its position, and shear stud layout. The results indicate that positioning mesh on top of the deck flange or 30 mm from top of the concrete slab does not affect the stud's strength and ductility. Thus, existing industry practice of locating the mesh at a nominal cover from top of the concrete slab and Eurocode 4 requirement of placing mesh 30 mm below the stud's head are both acceptable. Double mesh layer resulted in 17% increase in stud strength for push tests with single stud per rib. Placing a T16 bar at the bottom of the deck rib did not affect shear stud behaviour. The normal load resulted in 40% and 23% increase in stud strength for single and double studs per rib. Use of studs only in the middle three ribs out of five increased the strength by 23% compared to the layout with studs in first four ribs. Eurocode 4 and Johnson and Yuan equations predicted well the stud strength for single stud/rib tests without normal load, with estimations within 10% of the characteristic experimental load. These equations highly under-estimated the stud capacity, by about 40-50%, for tests with normal load. AISC 360-16 generally over-estimated the stud capacity, except for single stud/rib push tests with normal load. Nellinger equations precisely predicted the stud resistance for push tests with normal load, with ratio of experimental over predicted load as 0.99 and coefficient of variation of about 8%. But, Nellinger method over-estimated the stud capacity by about 20% in push tests with single studs without normal load.

키워드

과제정보

The authors would like to acknowledge Universities of Leeds, Bradford and East London, and MCRMA for supporting the project.

참고문헌

  1. ANSI/AISC 360-16. (2016), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  2. Bonilla, J., Bezerra, L.M., Mirambell, E. and Massicotte, B. (2018), "Review of stud shear resistance prediction in steel-concrete composite beams", Steel Compos. Struct., 27(3), 355- 370. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.3.355.
  3. Bradford, M.A., Filonov, A. and Hogan, T.J. (2006), "Push testing procedure for composite beams with deep trapezoidal slabs", Proceedings of the 11th, International Conference On Metal Structures; Progress In Steel, Composite And Aluminium Structures (ICMS-2006), Rzeszow, Poland.
  4. BS EN 1992-1-1. (2004), Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures, Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, British Standards Institution, London, UK.
  5. BS EN 1994-1-1. (2004), Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures, Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, British Standards Institution, London, UK.
  6. BS EN ISO 6892-1. (2009), Metallic materials - Tensile testing. Part 1: Method of test at ambient temperature, British Standards Institution, London, UK.
  7. David Collings. (2013), Steel-concrete Composite Bridges: Designing with Eurocodes. ICE Publishing, London, UK.
  8. Easterling, W.S., Gibbings, D.R. and Murray, T.M. (1993), "Strength of shear studs in steel deck on composite beams and joists", Eng. J., 30(2), 44-54.
  9. Ernst, S., Bridge, R.Q. and Wheeler, A. (2009), "Push-out tests and a new approach for the design of secondary composite beam shear connections", J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.04.010.
  10. Ernst, S., Bridge, R.Q. and Wheeler, A. (2010), "Correlation of beam tests with pushout tests in steel-concrete composite beams", J. Struct. Eng., 136(2), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2010)136:2(183).
  11. Hicks, S. (2007), "Strength and ductility of headed stud connectors welded in modern profiled steel sheeting", Structural Engineer, 85(10), 32-38.
  12. Hicks, S. and Couchman, G. (2004), "The shear resistance and ductility requirements of headed studs used with profiled steel sheeting", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete, Kruger National Park, Berg-en-Dal, Mpumalanga, South Africa, July 18-23.
  13. Hicks, S.J. and Smith, A.L. (2014), "Stud shear connectors in composite beams that support slabs with profiled steel sheeting", Structural Engineering International: Journal of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), 24(2), 246-253. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686614X13830790993122.
  14. Huo, J., Wang, H., Li, L. and Liu, Y. (2019), "Experimental study on impact behaviour of stud shear connectors in composite beams with profiled steel sheeting", J. Constr. Steel Res., 161, 436-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.04.029.
  15. Johnson, R.P. and Yuan, H. (1998), "Models and design rules for stud shear connectors in troughs of profiled sheeting", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, 128(3), 252-263. https://doi.org/10.1680/istbu.1998.30459.
  16. Kingspan. (2011), "Multideck Technical Handbook, Manufactures of Multideck Composite Metal Decking." North Yorkshire, United Kingdom, (Sep. 4, 2019).
  17. Lloyd, R.M. and Wright, H.D. (1990), "Shear connection between composite slabs and steel beams", J. Constr. Steel Res., 15(4), 255-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(90)90050-Q.
  18. Nellinger, S., Eggert, F., Kuhlmann, U., Odenbreit, C. and Obiala, R. (2018), "Short-span composite beam tests to evaluate stud resistances", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings, 171(1). https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.16.00173.
  19. Nellinger, S., Odenbreit, C. and Lawson, R.M. (2014), "Push-out tests with modern deck sheeting and realistic transverse loading", Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Steel, Space and Composite Structures, Prague, Czech Republic, 28-30 May.
  20. Nellinger, S., Odenbreit, C., Obiala, R. and Lawson, M. (2017), "Influence of transverse loading onto push-out tests with deep steel decking", J. Constr. Steel Res., 28, 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.08.021.
  21. Patrick, M. (2000), "Experimental investigation and design of longitudinal shear reinforcement in composite edge beams", Progress Struct. Eng. Mater., 2(2), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/1528-2716(200004/06)2:2<196::AID-PSE22>3.0.CO;2-2.
  22. Qureshi, J. (2010), "Finite element modelling of steel-concrete composite structures", PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Retrieved from http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/21112.
  23. Qureshi, J., Lam, D. and Ye, J. (2011), "Effect of shear connector spacing and layout on the shear connector capacity in composite beams", J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(4), 706-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.11.009.
  24. Rambo-Roddenberry, M.D. (2002), "Behavior and Strength of Welded Stud Shear Connectors", PhD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blancksburg, Virginia, USA. Retrieved from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/26989.
  25. Shen, M.H. and Chung, K.F. (2017a), "Structural Behaviour of Stud Shear Connections with Solid and Composite Slabs Under Co-Existing Shear and Tension Forces", Structures, 9, 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2016.09.011.
  26. Shen, M.H. and Chung, K.F. (2017b), "Experimental investigation into stud shear connections under combined shear and tension forces", J. Constr. Steel Res., 133, 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.02.021.
  27. Smith, A.L. and Couchman, G.H. (2010), "Strength and ductility of headed stud shear connectors in profiled steel sheeting", J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(6), 748-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.01.005.
  28. Stark, J. and Van Hove, B.W.E.M. (1991)., Statistical analysis of push-out tests on stud connectors in composite steel and concrete structures. TNO Building and Construction Research Report BI-91-163, Delft, The Netherlands.
  29. Sun, Q., Nie, X., Denavit, M.D., Fan, J. and Liu, W. (2019), "Monotonic and cyclic behavior of headed steel stud anchors welded through profiled steel deck", J. Constr. Steel Res., 157, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.01.022.