DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

근사모델과 후처리를 이용한 트러스 구조물의 이산 치수설계

Discrete Sizing Design of Truss Structure Using an Approximate Model and Post-Processing

  • Lee, Kwon-Hee (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dong-A University)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.24
  • 심사 : 2020.03.22
  • 발행 : 2020.05.31

초록

Structural optimization problems with discrete design variables require more function calculations (or finite element analyses) than those in the continuous design space. In this study, a method to find an optimal solution in the discrete design of the truss structure is presented, reducing the number of function calculations. Because a continuous optimal solution is the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker point that satisfies the optimality condition, it is assumed that the discrete optimal solution is around the continuous optimum. Then, response values such as weight, displacement, and stress are predicted using approximate models-referred to as hybrid metamodels-within specified design ranges. The discrete design method using the hybrid metamodels is used as a post-process of the continuous optimization process. Standard truss design problems of 10-bar, 25-bar, 15-bar, and 52-bar are solved to show the usefulness of this method. The results are compared with those of existing methods.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hupp, L., Klein, L., Liers, F., "An Exact Solution Method for Quadratic Matching: The One-Quadratic-Term Technique and Generalisations," Discrete Optimization, Vol. 18, pp. 1572-5286, 2015.
  2. Bagloee, S. A., Sarvi, M., Patriksson, M., “A Hybrid Branch‐and‐Bound and Benders Decomposition Algorithm for the Network Design Problem,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 319-343, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12224
  3. Lee, K. H., Yi, J. W., Park, J. S., Park, G. J., “An Optimization Algorithm Using Orthogonal Arrays in Discrete Design Space for Structures,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 121-135, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(03)00095-7
  4. Rajeev, S., Krishnamoorthy, C., “Discrete Optimization of Structures Using Genetic Algorithms,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 5, pp. 1233-1250, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1233)
  5. Li, L. J., Huang, Z. B., Liu, F., "A Heuristic Particle Swarm Optimization Method for Truss Structures with Discrete Variables," Computers and Structures, Vol. 87, No. 7-8, pp. 435-443, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.01.004
  6. Xiang, B. W., Chen, R. Q., Zhang, T., "Optimization of Trusses Using Simulated Annealing for Discrete Variables," Image Analysis and Signal Processing, IASP(International Conference on 2009), pp. 410-414, 2009.
  7. Camp, C. V., "Design of Space Trusses Using Big Bang-Big Crunch Optimization," Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 133, No. 7, 999-1008, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:7(999)
  8. Cheng, M. Y., Prayogo, D., Wu, Y. W., Lukito, M. M., "A Hybrid Harmony Search Algorithm for Discrete Sizing Optimization of Truss Structure," Automation in Construction, Vol. 69, pp. 21-33, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.023
  9. Park, H. S., Sung, C. W., "Optimization of Steel Structures Using Distributed Simulated Annealing Algorithms on a Cluster of Personal Computers," Computers and Structures, Vol. 80, pp. 1305-1316, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00073-1
  10. Lee, K. H., Jeong, G. I., Lee, S. H., “An Approximate Optimization Strategy Using Refined Hybrid Metamodel,” Computational Intelligence, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 35-54, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12237
  11. Goel, T, Haftka, R. T., Shyy, W., Queipo, N. V., “Ensemble of Surrogates,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 199-216, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0051-9
  12. Haftka, R. T., Villanueva, D., Chaudhuri, A., “Parallel Surrogate-Assisted Global Optimization with Expensive Functions-A Survey,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 3-13, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1432-3
  13. Gu, J. C., Li, G. Y., Gan, N. F., “Hybrid Metamodel-Based Design Space Management Method for Expensive Problems,” Engineering Optimization, Vol. 49, No. 9, pp. 1573-1588, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2016.1261126
  14. Cai, X. W., Qiu, H. B., Gao, L., Li, X. K., Shao, X. Y., “A Hybrid Global Optimization Method Based on Multiple Metamodels,” Engineering Computation, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 71-90, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-05-2016-0158
  15. Han, D. S., Jang, S. H, Park, S. H., Lee, K. H., “Structural Optimization of an LMU Using Approximate Model,” Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 1275-1282, 2018.
  16. Sacks, J., Welch, W., Mitchell, T., Wynn, H., "Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments," Statistical Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 409-423, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012413
  17. Lee, K. S., Geem, Z. W., Lee, S. H., Bae, K. W., "The Harmony Search Heuristic Algorithm for Discrete Structural Optimization," Engineering Optimization, Vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 663-684, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150500211895
  18. Kaveh, A., Talatahari, S., "Particle Swarm Optimizer, Ant Colony Strategy and Harmony Search Scheme Hybridized for Optimization of Truss Structures," Computers and Structures, Vol. 87, No. 5-6, pp. 267-283, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.01.003