DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Monitoring of Internal Harmful Factors According to Environmental Factors in Pig Farm

양돈장 내의 환경 요인에 따른 내부 유해인자의 변동 모니터링

  • Lee, Seong-Won (Department of Rural Construction Engineering, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyo-Cher (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences) ;
  • Seo, Il-Hwan (Department of Rural Construction Engineering, Jeonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2019.11.14
  • Accepted : 2020.01.06
  • Published : 2020.01.31

Abstract

With the decrease of the agricultural population in Korea, the workers who is vulnerable to labor are increasing in agricultural industry because of aging, feminization of population. They are exposed in poor working environment with higher temperature and concentrations of dust, gas. Higher concentration of harmful gas and dust can cause chronic and acute disease to workers depending on exposure intensity and frequency. In order to improve the working environment in the livestock facilities, It is important to secure monitoring data of the thermal environment and the concentration of harmful gases and fine dust. Multi-point measurement was performed to analyze the regional environmental conditions in the pig rooms. When analyzing the working environment, video monitoring was conducted to analyze the concentration changes of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and fine dust according to worker movement and work type. Ammonia and hydrogen sulfide monitoring result showed 1.5~2 times higher concentrations than other work when working in the pigs living zone, and 2~4 times higher than other work when working to increase the activity of pigs. In the case of fine dust, the result was 1.3 times higher than the worker's exposure standard in a specific work. The concentrations of gases and dusts from pig farms are not of concern for acute poisoning in normal work, but there is a risk of chronic respiratory disease if they are continuously exposed. Accordingly, there is a need for development of work environment monitoring device tailored to workers and preparation of alternatives.

Keywords

References

  1. Bruce, J. M., and M. Sommer, 1987. Environmental aspects of respiratory disease in intensive pig and poultry houses, including the implications for human health. Proceedings EC Meeting Aberdeen 29-30.
  2. Chapin, A., C. Boulind, and A. Moore, 1998. Controlling odor and gaseous emission problems from industrial swine facilities. Yale Environmental Protection Clinic.
  3. Cho, J. H., and I. H., Kim, 2011. Effect of stocking density on pig production. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(63): 13688-13692. doi:10.5897/AJB11.1691.
  4. Curtis S. E., J. G. Drummond, and J. Simon, 1977. Atmospheric ammonia affects swine health. Illinois Research 19: 8-9.
  5. Crook, B., J. F. Robertson, G. S. Travers, E. M. Botheroyd, J. Lacey, and M. D. Topping, 1991. Airborne dust, ammonia, mircoorganisms and antigens in pig confinement houses and respiratory health of exposed farm workers. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 52: 271-279.
  6. Eom, J., B. Woo, and Y. Kim, 2017. Employment status of foreign workers in agriculture and policy tasks. Korea Rural Economic Institute basic research report.
  7. Gautam, R., Y. Heo, G. Lim, E. Song, K. Rogue, J. Lee, Y. Kim, A. Cho, S. Shin, C. Kim, G. Bang, J. Bahng, and H. Kim, 2018. Altered immune responses in broiler chicken husbandry workers and their association with endotoxin exposure. Industrial Health 56(1): 10-19. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2017-0049.
  8. Donham, K. J., S. J. Stephen, J. Reynolds, P. Whitten, J. A. Merchant, L. Burmeister, and W. J. Popendorf, 1995. Respiratory dysfunction in swine production facility workers: Dose-response relationships of environmental exposures and pulmonary function. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 27(3): 405-418. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700270309.
  9. Kim, H. A., K. S., Kim, K. R., Kim, K. H., Kim, and Y. Heo, 2005. Immunologic alteration demonstrated at the economic animal husbandry workers. Toxicological Research 21(2): 121-128 (in Korean).
  10. Kim, N., 2018. Heatwave-responsive livestock specification management. National Institute of Animal Science Nongsaro.
  11. Korean Statistical Information Service, 2019. Livestock trend survey statistical information report, 39, Korea.
  12. Oh, B. W., S. W. Lee, H. C. Kim, and I. H. Seo, 2019. Analysis of working environment and ventilation efficiency in pig house using computational fluid dynamics. Journal of Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 61(2): 85-95 (in Korean). doi:10.5389/KSAE.2019.61.2.085.
  13. Seo, I. H., I. B. Lee, O. K. Moon, and K. S. Kwon, 2014. Aerodynamic approaches for estimation of waste disease spread in pig farm through airborne contaminants. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 56(1): 41-49 (in Korean). doi:10.5389/KSAE.2014.56.1.041.
  14. Smith, R. P., R. C. Cooper, T. Engen, E. R. Hendrickson, M. Katz, T. H. Milby, J. B. Mudd, A. T. Rossano, and J. Remond, 1979. Hydrogen Sulfide University Park Press, Baltimore.
  15. Stombaugh, D. P., H. S. Teague, and W. L. Roller, 1969. Effects of atmospheric ammonia on the pig. Journal of Animal Science 28(6): 844-847. doi:10.2527/jas1969.286844x.
  16. Reynolds, S. J., K. J. Donham, P. Whitten, J. A. Merchant, L. F. Burmeister, and W. J. Popendorf, 1996. Longitudinal evaluation of dose-response relationships for environmental exposures and pulmonary function in swine production workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 29(1): 33-4. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199601).
  17. Rural Development Administration, 2014. Pig-specification management general-summer pig specification, Crop Technology Information, 34 (in Korean).
  18. Thorne, P. S., A. Ansley, and S. S. Perry, 2009. Concentrations of bioaerosols, odors, and hydrogen sulfide inside and downwind from two types of swine livestock operations. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 6(4): 211-220. doi:10.1080/15459620902729184.
  19. Vermeer, H. M., K. H. De Greef, and H. W. J. Houwers, 2014. Space allowance and pen size affect welfare indicators and performance of growing pigs under comfort class conditions. Livestock Science 159: 79-86. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2013.10.021.