Education of Primary School Mathematics (한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the Similar Learning Contents between Elementary and Middle Schools in Geometry

기하 영역에서 초·중학교간 유사 학습내용에 대한 비교 분석 연구

  • Suh, Bo Euk (Department of Mathematics Education, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2019.12.09
  • Accepted : 2020.01.14
  • Published : 2020.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we extracted geometrical learning content that is treated similarly in elementary and middle schools, and analyzed the differences between how this study is handled in elementary and middle schools. The analysis tools used in this study were developed by referring to the research results presented by Merrill. Merrill classified the study results into two dimensions: 'performance level' and 'content type', and 'teach station' and 'proposal type' by presenting the contents in the textbook. Based on this classification, this study was conducted. According to the results of the study, nine achievement criteria were extracted as learning factors that were treated similarly in elementary and middle schools. The extracted learning elements were systematically analyzed through analysis tools. The results of this study are expected to provide significant implications for the improvement of mathematics learning and for the improvement of new curricula.

본 연구에서는 초등학교와 중학교에서 유사하게 다루는 기하 학습내용을 추출하고, 이 학습내용이 각 학교급에서 어떻게 다루고 있는지 그 차이점을 분석한다. 분석을 위한 도구는 Merrill 등의 연구를 기초로 한다. 먼저 학습한 결과를 '수행수준', '내용유형'으로 분류하고, 교과서 내용 제시 방법을 '교수요소', '제시유형'으로 분류하여 분석을 실시한다. 분석결과 유사한 학습내용으로 9개의 성취기준을 추출하고, 추출한 학습내용은 분석도구를 통해 탐색한다. 본 연구를 통해 현재 초·중학교에서 유사하게 다루는 기하 학습내용에 대한 실태를 확인함으로서 초·중학교 사이의 일관성 유무 및 구체적 차이점을 알 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011). 2009 Reformed Mathematics Curriculum, Seoul: MEST.
  2. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics Curriculum. Seoul: ME.
  3. Ministry of Education (2019a). Mathematics 3-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
  4. Ministry of Education (2019b). Mathematics 3-2. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
  5. Ministry of Education (2019c). Mathematics 4-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
  6. Ministry of Education (2019d). Mathematics 4-2. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
  7. Ministry of Education (2019e). Mathematics 5-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
  8. Ministry of Education (2019f). Mathematics 5-2. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
  9. Ministry of Education (2019g). Mathematics 6-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
  10. Ministry of Education (2019h). Mathematics 6-2. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
  11. Kim, W. K., Joe, M. S., Bang, K. S., Lim, S. H., Kim, D. H., Kang, S. J., Bae, S. K. Jee, E. J., & Kim, Y. H. (2019) Mathematics 1, Seoul: Bisang.
  12. Kim, W. K., Joe, M. S., Bang, K. S., Lim, S. H., Kim, D. H., Kang, S. J., Bae, S. K. Jee, E. J., & Kim, Y. H. (2019) Mathematics 2, Seoul: Bisang.
  13. Kim, J. H. (2011). Awareness and Steps of the Mathematical Justification of Elementary and Middle School Students, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 15(2), 417-435.
  14. Kim, T. E., Oh, S. C., Park, T. J., Woo, Y., K, Kwon, S. K., Kim, Y. B., & Seo, D. H. (2017). A Study on the Growth Process of Elementary and Middle School Underachievers, Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation RRI 2017-6.
  15. Park, K. M. et al. (2015). Development of revised mathematics course curriculum. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the advancement of science and reativity.
  16. Park, K. M. et al. (2014). Study on the restructuring of integrated mathematics curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  17. Park. H. S. (1991). Korea Mathematical Education History, Chungbuk: Korea Textbook Corporation.
  18. Baek, S. H., Kim, S. H., Hong, S. I., Yang, I. H., & Lee, J. C. (1993). An Analysis of Current Science Instruction Consistency by Micro Instructional Design Theory, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 13(3), 366-376.
  19. Suh, B. E. (2019). The Study on the Movement of Mathematics Contents among School Levels, East Asian mathematical journal, 35(4), 365-386. https://doi.org/10.7858/eamj.2019.033
  20. Song, J. S. (2009). An analysis of the presentation form of the contents on the textbooks by instructional quality profile. Unpublished master dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
  21. Shin, H. Y., You, E. S., Han, I. K., Suh, B. E,, Jeon, Y. B., Na, J. Y., & Shin, K. C. (2019). Jumping in School Mathematics, Chungbuk: Maedesign.
  22. Woo, J. H. (2006). Learning Mathematics-Teaching Principles and Methods, Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
  23. Woo, J. H. (2007). Educational Foundations of School Mathematics, Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
  24. Yoon, H. B. (1999). The Correlation Between Elementary School And Middle School Mathematics Record, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 1(2), 145-156.
  25. Lee, B. J., Han, I. K., & Suh, B. E. (2018a). An evaluation on the quality of mathematics instruction for 8th grade based on the instructional quality profile, East Asian mathematical journal, 34(2), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.7858/eamj.2018.010
  26. Lee, B. J., Han, I. K., & Suh, B. E. (2018b). An Evaluation on the Instruction Quality of Elective Courses Based on Instructional Quality Profile for Mathematics, The journal of educational research in mathematics, 28(4), 541-570.
  27. Choi, S. Y. (1993). A study on teaching profiles utilization for qualitative evaluation of textbooks. Development of curriculum evaluation tool(2). Eduational research institute of Korea National University of Education.
  28. KOFAC(2018). On-site support team for mathematics education, KOFAC Research Report.
  29. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2019). Curriculum Improvement Measures for Underachievers in Mathematics, KICE Research Report(In Press).
  30. Bloom, B. S.(1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Noston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  31. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education, Harvard University Press.
  32. Gagne, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction(1st ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  33. Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1974). The principles of instructional design(1st ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  34. Krutetskii, V. A.(1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  35. McHolland, J. D. (1971). Human Potential Seminars: An Approach to Turning on the Gifted Underachiever. ED 047349.
  36. Menchinskaya, N. A.(1979). Intellectual activity in solving arithmetic problems. In Kilpatrick, J and Wirszup, I.(Eds.) Soviet Studies in the Psychology of Learning and Teaching Mathematics, University of Chicago Press: 7-53.
  37. Merrill, M. D. & Boutwell, R. C. (1973). Instructional development: methodology and research. Review of Research in Education 1, 95-131. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X001001095
  38. Merrill, M. D. (1983). The component display theory. In Reigeluth, C. (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: an overview of their current status. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 279-333.
  39. Merrill, M. D., Leston Drake, Mark J. Lacy, Jean A. Pratt & the ID2 Research Group at Utah State University(1997). Reclaiming Instructional Design. Educational Technology 36(5), 5-7.
  40. Merrill, M. D. , Richards, R. E., Schmidt, R. V., & Wood, N. D. (1977). The instructional strategy diagnostic profile training manual. SD: Courseware, Inc.
  41. Merrill, M. D., & Wood, N. D. (1974). An instructional strategy taxonomy: Theory and applications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 6, 195-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/748695
  42. Merrill, M. D., Reigeluth, C., & Faust, G. (1979). The instructional quality profile: a curriculum evaluation and design tool. In H. A. O'Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Procedures for instructional systems development. NY: Academic Press.
  43. Shoff, H. G. (1984). The gifted underachiever: definition and identification. ED 252029.
  44. Suh, B., Lee, B., & Han, I. (2017). Development of IQP-based mathematics instructional quality profile. Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics 27(4), 539-560.
  45. Vygotsky, L. S.(2000). Spirit in Vygotsky society. Seoul: Yangseowon.