DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparative study of domestic and international research trends of mathematics education through topic modeling

토픽모델링을 활용한 국내외 수학교육 연구 동향 비교 연구

  • 신동조 (고려대학교 영재교육원)
  • Received : 2020.01.08
  • Accepted : 2020.02.17
  • Published : 2020.02.29

Abstract

This study analyzed 3,114 articles published in KCI journals and 1,636 articles published in SSCI journals from 2000 to 2019 in order to compare domestic and international research trends of mathematics education using a topic modeling method. Results indicated that there were 16 similar research topics in domestic and international mathematics education journals: algebra/algebraic thinking, fraction, function/representation, statistics, geometry, problem-solving, model/modeling, proof, achievement effect/difference, affective factor, preservice teacher, teaching practice, textbook/curriculum, task analysis, assessment, and theory. Also, there were 7 distinct research topics in domestic and international mathematics education journals. Topics such as affective/cognitive domain and research trends, mathematics concept, class activity, number/operation, creativity/STEAM, proportional reasoning, and college/technology were identified from the domestic journals, whereas discourse/interaction, professional development, identity/equity, child thinking, semiotics/embodied cognition, intervention effect, and design/technology were the topics identified from the international journals. The topic related to preservice teacher was the most frequently addressed topic in both domestic and international research. The topic related to in-service teachers' professional development was the second most popular topic in international research, whereas it was not identified in domestic research. Domestic research in mathematics education tended to pay attention to the topics concerned with the mathematical competency, but it focused more on problem-solving and creativity/STEAM than other mathematical competencies. Rather, international research highlighted the topic related to equity and social justice.

본 연구는 2000년부터 2019년까지 7종의 KCI 등재지에 게재된 3,114편의 수학교육 논문와 5종의 SSCI 등재지에 게재된 1,636편의 수학교육 논문의 연구 동향을 텍스트 마이닝 기술의 하나인 토픽모델링을 사용하여 비교·분석하였다. 연구 결과, 국내외 수학교육 연구는 16개의 유사한 주제와 7개의 상이한 주제로 분류할 수 있었다. 연구 결과, 예비교사와 관련된 주제는 국내와 해외 수학교육 연구에서 모두 높은 비중을 차지하고 있는 연구주제였다. 현직교사 재교육에 관한 연구주제는 국내 연구에서는 하나의 독립된 주제로 나타나지 않았지만, 해외 연구에서 많은 관심을 받는 주제로 나타났다. 해외 수학교육 연구에 비해 국내에서는 수학적 역량에 관한 연구의 관심이 높았지만, 이는 문제해결역량과 창의·융합역량에 치중되는 경향이 있었다. 반면, 해외 수학교육에서는 정체성과 공정성에 관한 연구가 강조되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J. S. (2015). The development of children's algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39-87. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039
  2. Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
  3. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.
  4. Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research-A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004
  5. Cho, H. J., & Kim, I. S. (2016). Analyzing research trend of affective aspects in mathematics in Korea. Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(1), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2016.30.1.67
  6. Cho, H., Kwon, O. N., Bae, Y., & Lee, A. (2014). Analyzing research trend of interaction in mathematics classroom in Korea. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(6), 363-387.
  7. Choi, M. S., Jeong, D. R., & Kim, J. S. (2012). Analysis for the concept of smooth curve by velocity. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 22(1), 23-38.
  8. Choi, J., & Kwak, M. (2019). Topic changes in mathematics educational research based on LDA. Journal of Education & Culture, 25(5), 1149-1176.
  9. Chong, Y. O., & Jung, Y. K. (2016). 5th and 6th grade Korean students' proportional reasoning abilities. School Mathematics, 18(4), 819-838.
  10. Geiger, V., Muir, T., & Lamb, J. (2016). Video-stimulated recall as a catalyst for teacher professional learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(5), 457-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9306-y
  11. Ha, S. H., Pang, J. S., & Ju, M. K. (2010). Research trends in elementary mathematics education: Focused on the papers published in domestic journals during the recent 5 years. The Mathematical Education, 49(1), 67-83.
  12. Han, C., & Kwon, O. N. (2018). Domestic research trends and tasks on early algebra education: Focused on the elementary school mathematics. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 22(2), 115-142.
  13. Han, H. (2013). The analysis of research trends on STEAM instructional program and the development of mathematics-centered STEAM instructional program. Communications of Mathematical Education, 27(4), 523-545. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2013.27.4.523
  14. Inglis, M., & Foster, C. (2018). Five decades of mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 462-500. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0462
  15. Jin, M., & Ko, H. K. (2019). Analysis of trends in mathematics education research using text mining. Communications of Mathematical Education, 33(3), 275-294.
  16. Kang, M. K. (2010). A study on the comparison of triangle congruence in Euclidean geometry. The Mathematical Education, 49(1), 53-65.
  17. Kidron, I., & Tall, D. (2015). The roles of visualization and symbolism in the potential and actual infinity of the limit process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9567-x
  18. Kim, H. M. (2016). An analysis of the research trend in Korea regarding mathematical problem solving. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(8), 831-850. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2016.16.11.831
  19. Kim, S. J. (2002). A study on the algebraic notations and algebraic thinking. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics. 12(2), 229-245.
  20. Kim, M., & Kim, G. Y. (2013). The analysis of mathematical tasks in the high school mathematics. School Mathematics, 15(1), 37-59.
  21. Kim, J. W., & Kim, D. J. (2019). A Study on the research trends of social studies using text mining: Focused on academic papers after 2000. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 51(2), 35-70. https://doi.org/10.35557/trce.51.2.201906.002
  22. Kim, R. Y., Kim, G. Y., & Kwon, N. Y. (2012). Trends in research design and methods: Research on elementary and secondary mathematics curriculum. School Mathematics, 14(3), 395-408.
  23. Kim, Y., & Pang, J. (2017). Research trends in elementary mathematics education: Focused on the papers published in domestic journals during the recent seven years. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 20(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2017.20.1.19
  24. Kim, K. M., & Whang, W. H. (2012). An analysis of students understanding of operations with whole numbers and fractions. The Mathematical Education, 51(1), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2012.51.1.021
  25. Kospentaris, G., Spyrou, P., & Lappas, D. (2011). Exploring students' strategies in area conservation geometrical tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9303-8
  26. Kwon, N. Y., Kim, R. Y., & Kim, G. Y. (2011). Trends in research on mathematics curriculum: An analysis of research topics. The Mathematical Education, 50(4), 507-520. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2011.50.4.507
  27. Lee, E. H., & Kim, W. K. (2015). A comparative analysis on research trends of statistics education between Korea and overseas. The Mathematical Education, 54(3), 241-259. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2015.54.3.241
  28. Lew, K. H., & Hwang, S. W. (2019). A study on the correlation between mathematics anxiety and mathematics achievement in high school students. The Mathematical Education, 58(3), 337-346. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2019.58.3.337
  29. Min, K. A., Yoo, M. H., & Ko, H. K. (2011). An analysis of research trend in domestic mathematics gifted education. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 14(3), 389-413.
  30. Ministry of Education. (2015). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education.
  31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  32. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
  33. Pang, J. S., & Hwang, H. M. (2012). Research trends of mathematics textbooks-focused on the papers published between 2006 and 2011 in domestic journals. The Mathematical Education, 51(3), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2012.51.3.247
  34. Pang, J. S., & Kim, S. M. (2019). An analysis of the trends of value research : Focused on mathematical values and mathematics educational values. The Mathematical Education, 58(4), 609-625. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2019.58.4.609
  35. Pang, J. S., Kwon, M. S., & Sun, W. J. (2017). Trends and issues in research on noticing in mathematics education. School Mathematics, 19(4), 795-817.
  36. Pang, J. S., Sun, W. J., Cho, S. M., Lee, Y. J., Kim, E. K., Kim, Y. Y., ..., Lee, H. N. (2019). Domestic research trends of mathematics education: An analysis of journals published from 1963 to 2019. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 29(4), 709-739. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2019.11.29.4.709
  37. Park, M. G. (2019). Research trends of mathematics education for social justice. Communications of Mathematical Education, 33(2), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2019.33.2.141
  38. Park, S. Y., & Kim, W. K. (2011). A comparative analysis on research trends of secondary mathematics education between Korea and overseas. The Mathematical Education, 50(3), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2011.50.3.285
  39. Pittalis, M., & Christou, C. (2010). Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability. Educational Studies in mathematics, 75(2), 191-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9251-8
  40. Ryve, A. (2011). Discourse research in mathematics education: A critical evaluation of 108 journal articles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 167-199. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.2.0167
  41. Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem?. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4-36.
  42. Shin, M. S. (2019). Analysis of study trends in Korean grammar education using topic modeling and network analysis. Grammar Education, 36, 95-134. https://doi.org/10.21850/kge.2019.36..95
  43. Shin, D. J., & Choi-Koh, S. S. (2019). A study on investigation about the meaning and the research trend of computational thinking(CT) in mathematics education. The Mathematical Education, 58(4), 483-505. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2019.58.4.483
  44. Shin, S., Ha, M., & Lee, J. K. (2018). Rediscovering the interest of science education: Focus on the meaning and value of interest. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 38(5), 705-720. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.5.705
  45. Song, K., & Pang, J. (2013). Domestic research trends of teacher knowledge in mathematics. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 16(1), 265-287.
  46. Starbuck, W. H. (2005). How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science, 16(2), 180-200. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0107
  47. Sun, W. J., & Pang, J. (2019). Domestic research trends of mathematics teacher education: Focused on the journals published since 2000 by the Korean Society of Mathematics Education. The Mathematical Education, 58(1), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2019.58.1.121
  48. Tak, B., & Lee, K. H. (2017). An analysis of research trends on statistics education in Korea from 2000 to 2016. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 27(2), 269-289.
  49. Takahashi, A., & McDougal, T. (2016). Collaborative lesson research: Maximizing the impact of lesson study. ZDM, 48(4), 513-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0752-x
  50. Williams, S. R., & Leatham, K. R. (2017). Journal quality in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 369-396. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0369
  51. Yim, J. (2010). Children's strategies for division by fractions in the context of the area of a rectangle. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9206-0
  52. Yim, Y., Yim, Y. E., & Km, S. M. (2019). A study on the performance of sixth-grade elementary school students about the perimeter and area of plane figure and the surface area and volume of solid figure. The Mathematical Education, 58(2), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2019.58.2.283