DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

User-Participated Design Method for Perforated Metal Facades using Virtual Reality

가상현실 기반 사용자 참여형 타공패널 파사드 설계 방법론

  • 장도진 (성균관대학교 건축학과) ;
  • 김성준 (성균관대학교 미래도시융합공학과) ;
  • 김성아 (성균관대학교 건축학과)
  • Received : 2019.12.27
  • Accepted : 2020.04.16
  • Published : 2020.04.30

Abstract

Perforated metal sheets are used as panels of facades for controlling environmental factors while ensuring user's visibility. Despite their functional potentials, only a specific direction of facades or an orientation of a building was considered in the relevant studies. This study proposed a design methodology for the perforated panel facades that reflects the location on the facades and the user's requirements. The optimization of quantitative and qualitative performance is achieved through communication between designers and users in a VR system. In optimizing quantitative performances, designers use machine learning techniques such as clustering and genetic algorithm to allocate optimal panels on the facades. In optimizing qualitative performances, through the VR system, users intervene in evaluating performances whose preferences are depending on them. The experiment using the office project showed that designers were able to make decisions based on clustering using GMM to optimize multiple quantitative performances. The gap between the target and final performance could be narrowed by limiting the types of perforated panels considering mass customization. In assessing visibility as a qualitative performance, users were able to participate in the design process using the VR system.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

본 연구는 정부(교육과학기술부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 기초연구사업의 지원을 받았음(과제번호:2016R1D1A1B01013694).

References

  1. Barrett, P., & Stanley, C. A. (1999). Better construction briefing. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Blanco, J. M., Arriaga, P., Roji, E., & Cuadrado, J. (2014). Investigating the thermal behavior of double-skin perforated sheet facades: Part A: Model characterization and validation procedure. Building and Environment, 82, 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.08.007
  3. Blanco, J. M., Buruaga, A., Cuadrado, J., & Zapico, A. (2019). Assessment of the influence of facade location and orientation in indoor environment of double-skin building envelopes with perforated metal sheets. Building and Environment, 163.
  4. Bodart, M., & De Herde, A. (2002). Global energy savings in offices buildings by the use of daylighting. Energy and buildings, 34(5), 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00117-7
  5. Biemans, W. G., & Brand, M. J. (1995). Reverse marketing: a synergy of purchasing and relationship marketing. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 31(2), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1995.tb00206.x
  6. Castronovo, F., Nikolic, D., Liu, Y., & Messner, J. (2013). An evaluation of immersive virtual reality systems for design reviews. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on construction applications of virtual reality, 47, 22-29.
  7. Cattarin, G., Causone, F., Kindinis, A., & Pagliano, L. (2016). Outdoor test cells for building envelope experimental characterisation-A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 606-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.012
  8. Chi, D. A., Moreno, D., Esquivias, P. M., & Navarro, J. (2017). Optimization method for perforated solar screen design to improve daylighting using orthogonal arrays and climate-based daylight modelling. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10(2), 144-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2016.1197969
  9. Chi, D. A., Moreno, D., & Navarro, J. (2017). Design optimisation of perforated solar facades in order to balance daylighting with thermal performance. Building and Environment, 125, 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.09.007
  10. Chi, D. A., Moreno, D., & Navarro, J. (2018). Impact of perforated solar screens on daylight availability and low energy use in offices. Advances in Building Energy Research, 1-25.
  11. Deutsch, R. (2015). Data-driven design and construction: 25 strategies for capturing, analyzing and applying building data. John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Fuchs, P., Moreau, G. and Guitton, P. (Eds.) (2011). Virtual Reality: Concepts and Technologies. London, UK: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.
  13. Harvey, D. (1992). Invisible Site: A Virtual Sho. George Coates Performance Works, San Francisco, California). Variety, v346.
  14. Ibayashi, H., Sugiura, Y., Sakamoto, D., Miyata, N., Tada, M., Okuma, T., ... & Igarashi, T. (2015). Dollhouse vr: a multi-view, multi-user collaborative design workspace with vr technology. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Emerging Technologies. ACM.
  15. Julie Milovanovic, Guillaume Moreau, Daniel Siret, and Francis Miguet. (2017). Virtual and Augmented Reality in Architectural Design and Education An Immersive Multimodal Platform to Support Architectural Pedagogy", Future Trajectories of Computation in Design, 17th International Conference, CAAD Futures 2017, At Istanbul, Turkey, p. 20.
  16. Jung, Y. S. & Kim, T. H. (2019). Estimation and Feature of Greenhouse Gas Emission in Building Sector by National Energy Statistic, Journal of the Architecture Institute of Korea, Structure & Construction Section, 35(7), 187-195.
  17. Kalay, Y. E. (2004). Architecture's new media: Principles, theories, and methods of computer-aided design. MIT Press.
  18. Konis, K. (2013). Evaluating daylighting effectiveness and occupant visual comfort in a side-lit open-plan office building in San Francisco, California. Building and Environment, 59, 662-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.017
  19. Loyola, M., Rossi, B., Montiel, C., & Daiber, M. (2019, September). Use of Virtual Reality in Participatory Design. In 37th eCAADe and 23rd SIGraDi Conference: Architecture in the Age of the 4th Industrial Revolution (pp. 449-454). eCAADe, Sigradi, Faup.
  20. Mironovs, V., Tatarinov, A., & Gorbacova, S. (2017). Expanding application of perforated metal materials in construction and architecture. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 251(1), 1-9.
  21. Patel, N. K., Campion, S. P., & Fernando, T. (2002). Evaluating the use of virtual reality as a tool for briefing clients in architecture. In Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Information Visualisation, 657-663. IEEE.
  22. Petrova, E. A., Rasmussen, M., Jensen, R. L., & Svidt, K. (2017). Integrating Virtual Reality and BIM for End-user Involvement in Building Design: a case study. In The Joint Conference on Computing in Construction (JC3) 2017 (pp. 699-709). The Joint Conference on Computing in Construction (JC3) 2017.
  23. Niu, S., Pan, W., & Zhao, Y. (2016). A virtual reality integrated design approach to improving occupancy information integrity for closing the building energy performance gap. Sustainable cities and society, 27, 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.03.010
  24. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of communication, 42(4), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
  25. Tseng, K. C., & Huang, P. H. (2017). A systematic review of the potential application of virtual reality within a user pre-occupancy evaluation. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, 612-620. Springer, Cham.
  26. Uribe, D., Bustamante, W., & Vera, S. (2018). Potential of perforated exterior louvers to improve the comfort and energy performance of an office space in different climates. In Building Simulation, 11(4), 695-708. Tsinghua University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0435-y
  27. Wang, X., & Schnabel, M. A. (Eds.). (2008). Mixed reality in architecture, design, and construction. Springer Science & Business Media.
  28. Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Zhao, M., & Al-Hussein, M. (2019). User-centered interior finishing material selection: An immersive virtual reality-based interactive approach. Automation in Construction, 106.
  29. Ziebell, A. C., Pedamallu, L. R. T., & Singh, V. K. Perforated Facades Design Approach to Sustainable Building for Visual and Thermal Comfort. Journal of Energy Research and Environmental Technology, 4(1), 85-89.