DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

다중기기 취약도곡선의 지진상관계수 조합 절차

Combination Procedure for Seismic Correlation Coefficient in Fragility Curves of Multiple Components

  • 김정한 (부산대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 김시영 (부산대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 최인길 (한국원자력연구원 기기구조예측진단연구부)
  • Kim, Jung Han (Department of Civil Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Si Young (Department of Civil Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, In-Kil (Structural Safety & Prognosis Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.16
  • 심사 : 2020.04.13
  • 발행 : 2020.05.01

초록

For the important safety system, two or more units of identical equipment or redundant components with similar function were installed to prevent abnormal failure. If the failure probability of such equipment is independent, this redundancy could increase the system safety remarkably. However, if the failure of each component is highly correlated by installing in a structure or experiencing an earthquake event, the expected redundancy effect will decrease. Therefore, the seismic correlation of the equipment should be evaluated quantitatively for the seismic probabilistic safety assessment. The correlation effect can be explained in the procedure of constructing fragility curves. In this study, several methodologies to quantify the seismic correlation in the failure probability calculation for multiple components were reviewed and two possible ways considering the realistic situation were selected. Simple examples were tested to check the applicability of these methods. The conversion method between these two methods was suggested to render the evaluation using the advantages of each method possible.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kennedy RP, Ravindra MK. Seismic for Nuclear Power Plant Risk Studies. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 1984;79:47-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(84)90188-2
  2. Wells JE, George LL, Cummings GE. Seismic Safety Margins Research Program; Systems Analysis (Project VIII). NUREG/CR-2015. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Livermore. CA. c1983.
  3. USNRC. Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG-1150). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. c1990.
  4. Ravindra MK, Banon H, Sues RH, Thrasher RD. Sensitivity Studies of Seismic Risk Models, Report EPRI-NP-3562. Electric Power Research Institute. c1984.
  5. Watanabe Y, Oikawa T, Muramatsu K. Development of the DQFM Method to Consider the Effect of Correlation of Component Failures in Seismic PSA of Nuclear Power Plant. Journal of Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2003;79:265-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00053-4
  6. Budnitz RJ, Hardy GS , Moore DL, Ravindra MK. Correlation of Seismic Performance in Similar SSCs (Structures, Systems, and Components) (No. NUREG/CR-7237). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. c2017.
  7. Reed JW, McCann MW, Iihara J, Tamjed H.H. ICOSSAR '85, 4th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, Analytical Techniques for Performing Probabilistic Seismic Risk Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants. U.S. 1985 May;III 253-263.
  8. Bohn MP, Lambright JA. Procedures for the External Event Core Damage Frequency Analyses for NUREG-1150. NUREC/CR-4840. Sandia National Laboratories. c1990.
  9. Iman RL, Conover WJ. A Distribution-free Approach to Inducing Rank Correlation Among Input Variables. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation. 1982;11(3):311-334 . https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918208812265
  10. Pellissetti MF, Klapp U. Transactions of Twenty-First SMiRT Conference, Integration of Correlation Models for Seismic Failures into Fault Tree Based Seismic PSA. 2011 Nov; New Delhi, India. Div-Vii:Paper ID# 604.
  11. Wakefield D, Ravindra MK, Merz K, Hardy G. Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Implementation Guide. EPRI TR-1002989. EPRI. Palo Alto. c2003.
  12. Ebisawa K, Teragaki T, Nomura S, Abe H, Shigemori M, Shimomoto M. Concept and Methodology for Evaluating Core Damage Frequency Considering Failure Correlation at Multi Units and Sites and Its Application. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2015;288:82-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.01.002
  13. EPRI. Seismic Fragility Applications Guide Update. EPRI 1019200. EPRI. Palo Alto. c2009.
  14. EPRI. Seismic Fragility and Seismic Margin Guidance for Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessments. EPRI 3002012994. EPRI. Palo Alto. c2018.