DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Preserving, Replanting and Recycling of Reconstruction Estates' Existing Trees for Sustainable Conversion - Focused on the Case of Greenbank System by UR Agency in Japan -

주거단지의 지속전환을 위한 기존 수목 보존과 활용 - 일본 UR도시기구의 그린뱅크 시스템을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2019.12.17
  • Accepted : 2020.02.03
  • Published : 2020.02.28

Abstract

There are many existing trees are to be damaged by reconstruction of large housing estates. The purpose of this study was to find out sustainable conversion methods of Greenbank system by UR Agency. Greenbank system is divided 3 parts as Preserving, Replanting, Recycling of Existing trees. Literature and institutional review and site survey of 5 reconstruction housing estate were the methods for the following findings. The results are follows. Firstly, Because of feasibility of reconstruction, existing trees are preserving at boundary space of reconstruction housing estates. Secondly, existing trees are preserving at inner space for remember of resettlement as symbolic trees. It is conformed by residents participation with UR Agency and city official. Thirdly, Preserving and replanting trees are recorded signboard in the reconstruction housing estates, and preserving of trees are developed as Green workshop by residents. Fourthly, Besides Preserving and Replanting trees, the other trees are recycling as bench, play equipment, planter, etc. And it is remained symbol of reconstruction housing estates. Fifthly, District planning as a institutional, Guidelines as a noninstitutional method are very efficiently for preserving trees. But a part of this study can be adapt reconstruction housing estates in Korea. The results of this study are expected to serve some clue for dealing with the practice of sustainable conversion in housing estates.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

이 논문은 2017년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2017S1A5B5A07061522)

References

  1. Yoo, S., & Park, C. (2011). A Study on the Concept and Elements for Sustainable Conversion in Housing Estates, Journal of AIK, 27(11), 235
  2. UR Agency (2008a). Housing Complexes${\times}$eco, 32-35.
  3. Jung, S. (2012). An Analysis on the use situation of the reusing Landscape tree in lanscaping of re-construction Apartment Complex, Master Thesis, Hanyang University
  4. Lee, I. (2016). A Study on the Transplanting Trees Selection Method Development based on Evaluation of the Reconstruction Apartment Complex Landscape Trees, Master Thesis, University of Seoul
  5. Kang, H. (2016). A Study on the Meaning as Place Memory of Yeokmok (Station Tree) in the Un-used Small Station Renovated Landscape, Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea Vol.18 n.5, The Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 9-16.
  6. UR Agency (2008b). UR都市機構の環境配慮50年の歩み(年表), Urban Renaissance Agency Environmental Report, 60-61.
  7. UR Agency (2008c). 既存樹木の有効活用(Greenbank System), Urban Renaissance Agency Environmental Report, 38.
  8. City of Musasino (2009). Urban Planning of Musasino Sakuratutumi District, 2.
  9. Ryo, N. (2010). A study on the evaluation of landscape succession in the housing estate redevelopment project involving land disposal to private developers, Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan No.45-3, The City Planning Institute of Japan, 781-786.
  10. UR Agency(Branch of East-Japan) (2007). Landscape Guidline of Sakuratutumi District, 12-14.
  11. City of Mitaka (2009). Mitakadaidanchi District Planning
  12. UR Agency(Branch of East-Japan) (2008). Landscape Guidline of Mitakadaidanchi District(Concept Book), 1-14.
  13. Kazushi, S. (2009). A study on landscape planning in the rebuilding apartments of a housing complex involving site selling to private developers : Focused on landscape guideline, Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan No.44-3, The City Planning Institute of Japan, 1-6.
  14. Yutaka, K. (2000). Process of Decision Making on Planning, Design, Preservation and Use of Greenery in Public Housing Renovation Projects, Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 63(4), The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 279-282. https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.63.279