디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제18권4호
  • /
  • Pages.193-200
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털 사이니지의 유형별 효과에 개인특성 변수가 미치는 영향

A Study on the Effect of Type and Personal Characteristics of Digital Signage

  • Ju, Tae-Wook (Division of Business Administration, Daelim University College) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Seok (Division of Business Administration, Daelim University College)
  • 투고 : 2020.02.25
  • 심사 : 2020.04.20
  • 발행 : 2020.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 새로운 옥외광고매체인 디지털 사이니지에 효과에 대해 알아보았다. 구체적으로 관여도와 자기효능감이라는 조절변수를 통해 인터랙티브형 디지털 사이니지와 단순터치형 디지털 사이니지의 차별적 효과를 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구결과, 인터랙티브형 디지털 사이니지가 단순터치형 디지털 사이니지에 비해 긍정적인 광고 효과를 가져오는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 자기효능감이 높은 경우, 인터랙티브형 디지털 사이니지가 단순터치형 디지털 사이니지에 비해 더욱 긍정적인 효과를 가져왔지만 자기효능감이 낮은 경우 디지털 사이니지 유형 간의 효과는 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 관여도는 디지털 사이니지 유형별 효과에 영향을 미치는 않는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 디지털 사이니지 효과를 극대화할 수 있는 맞춤형 고객 전략을 수립하는데 도움을 줄 수 있다고 사료된다.

In this study, we investigated the effect on digital signage, a new outdoor advertising medium. Specifically, this research examined the differential effects of interactive digital signage and simple touch digital signage through control variables such as involvement and self-efficacy. As a result, interactive digital signage showed positive advertising effect compared to simple touch digital signage. In addition, interactive digital signage has a more positive effect than simple touch digital signage when involvement is self-efficacy is high. However, the effect of the digital signage types was not significant when the self-efficacy was low. Lastly, involvement did not affect the effects of digital signage types. In this study, we can help to establish a customized customer strategy that can maximize digital signage effect.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A. Go & S. W. Shim. (2014). A Study on the Effect Measurement Model of In-store Digital Siignage: Focused on Physical Feature of CVS Digital Signage, The Korean of Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 153-178. DOI : 10.14377/kja.2014.1.15.153
  2. S. C. Yoo, J. Min & H. H. Hwang. (2016). The State and Trend of Digital Signage Research in Korea, Journal of The Korea Contents Association, 16(1), 745-757. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.10.745
  3. H. S. Lee. (1990). Moderating Roles of Consumer Involvement and Ad Types in Consumer Information Processing, Korean Management Review, 19(2), 87-116.
  4. S. H. Kim. (2018), Exploratory Research for Healthy Growth Korean out of Home Media Industry, Journal of OOH Advertising Research, 15(4), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.16914/ar.2018.118.5
  5. S. W. Eum. (2019), A Study on the Influence of Augment Reality(AR) Types on Brand Attachment, Management & Information Systems Review, 38(2), 241-254. DOI : 10.29214/damis.2019.38.2.013
  6. T. Sung, S. Hong & J. Yoon. (2008). Study on the Effects of Digital Contents Traits on the Relationship Quality and Continuous Intention of Using, Management & Information Systems Review, 26, 91-116. DOI : 10.29214/damis.2008..26.004
  7. D. H. Yun. (2019). A Study on Development of Measurement Tools for Word-of-Mouth Constraint Factors: Focusing on SNS Advertising, Management & Information Systems Review, 38(2), 209-223. DOI : 10.29214/damis.2019.38.2.011
  8. J. Kim & H. Park. (2017). Effects of User Interface and Media Engagement on Media Attitudes and Advertising Attitudes, Journal of OOH Advertising Research, 14(2), 26-41.
  9. K. S. Han. (2019). The Effect of Presence and Interactivity of Digital Signage Using 3D Virtual Reality on Brand Experinence and Attitude, Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(4), 299-307. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.4.299
  10. J. Y. Cho. (2019). A Study of the Effectiveness of Digital Signage: Importance of Customized Content, Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(6), 211-217. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.6.211
  11. E. S. Nahm. (2015). Development of Multi-Touch/Context-Aware Convergence Digital Signage System based on Android OS Platform, Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(8), 245-251. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2015.13.8.245
  12. K. S. Han. (2013). Influence of Brand Experience by Digital Signage Advertising Types on Engagement, Advertising Research, 98, 43-84.
  13. R. J. Brodie & L. D. Hollebeek. (2011). Response: Advancing and Consolidating Knowledge about Customer Engagement, Journal of Service, 14, 283-284. DOI : 10.1177/1094670511415523
  14. A. Wang. (2006). Advertising Engagement: A Driver of Message Involvement on Message Effects, Journal of Advertising Research, 12, 355-368. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849906060429
  15. C. Lee & J. C. Chang. (2009). The Influence of TV Program's Engagement on Advertising Effects, Advertising Research, 83, 155-191.
  16. H. Lee & N. K. Kwon. (2006). The Role of Internet Self-efficacy in Internet Shopping, Asia Marketing Journal, 8(2), 27-62.
  17. H. Park & D. W. Lee. (2017). Effects of User Interface and Economic Purposes on User Experience and Consumer Behaviors of Digital Signage, Journal of OOH Advertising Research, 14(2), 69-83.
  18. H. S. Lee, K. H. Ahn & Y. W. Ha. (2010). Consumer Behavior. Paju: Bobmunsa.
  19. B. Mittal. (1989). Must Consumer Involvement Always Imply More Information Search?, Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 167-172.
  20. S. J. Park & N. H. Choe. (2004). An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Consumer's Transaction Coupling and Activeness of Consumption Behavior on the Acquisition Utility and Satisfaction of Adance Purchase of Service Product, Journal of Consumer Studies, 15(1), 111-134.
  21. A. Bandura. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change, Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. DOI : 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
  22. P. R. Pintrich & T. Garcia. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom, Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Goals and Self-regulatory Processes, 7, 371-402.
  23. C. A. Murphy, D. Coover & S. V. Owen. (1988). Assessment of Computer Self-Efficacy: Instrument Development and Validation, ERIC Document.
  24. M. Sherer, & J. E. Maddux. (1982). The Self-efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation, Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663