DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of acidic beverages on surface roughness and color stability of artificial teeth and acrylic resin

  • Bitencourt, Sandro Basso (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry) ;
  • Catanoze, Isabela Arague (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry) ;
  • da Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry) ;
  • dos Santos, Paulo Henrique (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry) ;
  • dos Santos, Daniela Micheline (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry) ;
  • Turcio, Karina Helga Leal (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry) ;
  • Guiotti, Aimee Maria (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2019.08.28
  • Accepted : 2020.03.12
  • Published : 2020.04.30

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim was to evaluate the effect of four acidic beverages on the roughness (Ra) and color change (ΔEab) of two brands of artificial teeth and a heat-polymerized acrylic resin (HPAR) for use in a prosthetic base. MATERIALS AND METHODS. All materials were divided into 5 groups, according to the used acidic beverage (artificial saliva - control, red wine, orange juice, coke-based, and lemon juice-based soft drink). The immersion process was divided into two stages: T1 - immersion in the acidic solutions for 10 minutes for 14 days; T2 - after T1, the samples were immersed in grape juice for 14 days. The Ra of the samples was evaluated in a rugosimeter and the ΔEab in a spectrophotometer, before and after the immersions. The analysis of variance of one (ΔEab) and two factors (Ra) and Tukey were performed (α=.05). RESULTS. There was a statistical difference for roughness after immersion (T1) for Trilux and Tritone teeth, regardless of the acid solution. For Trilux teeth, all acid solutions increased Ra (P<.05). For Tritone teeth, only the coke-based soft drink did not statistically change Ra. Grape juice (T2) altered Ra only of artificial teeth (P<.05). The color was changed for all materials, after T1 and T2. CONCLUSION. In general, the acidic solutions changed the Ra and ΔEab of HPAR and artificial teeth after T1. The grape juice altered the roughness only of the artificial teeth, promoting a clinically acceptable color change in the materials.

Keywords

References

  1. Zissis AJ, Polyzois GL, Yannikakis SA, Harrison A. Roughness of denture materials: a comparative study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:136-40.
  2. Perez Davidi M, Beyth N, Sterer N, Feuerstein O, Weiss EI. Effect of liquid-polish coating on in vivo biofilm accumulation on provisional restorations: part 1. Quintessence Int 2007;38:591-6.
  3. Atabek D, Sillelioglu H, Olmez A. The efficiency of a new polishing material: nanotechnology liquid polish. Oper Dent 2010;35:362-9. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-196-T
  4. Al-Kheraif AA. The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins. Saudi Dent J 2014;26:56-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2013.12.007
  5. Guandalini Cunha B, Duque C, Sampaio Caiaffa K, Massunari L, Arague Catanoze I, Dos Santos DM, de Oliveira SHP, Guiotti AM. Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial effects of citronella oil (Cymbopogon nardus) and commercial mouthwashes on S. aureus and C. albicans biofilms in prosthetic materials. Arch Oral Biol 2020;109:104577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104577
  6. Izumida FE, Jorge JH, Ribeiro RC, Pavarina AC, Moffa EB, Giampaolo ET. Surface roughness and Candida albicans biofilm formation on a reline resin after long-term chemical disinfection and toothbrushing. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1523-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.06.001
  7. Reggiani MGL, Feitosa FA, Araujo RM de. Color stability of artificial teeth after exposure to acid and staining agents. Braz Dent Sci 2015;18:60-6. https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2015.v18i1.1068
  8. Bettencourt AF, Neves CB, de Almeida MS, Pinheiro LM, Oliveira SA, Lopes LP, Castro MF. Biodegradation of acrylic based resins: A review. Dent Mater 2010;26:e171-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.01.006
  9. Safari A, Vojdani M, Mogharrabi S, Iraji Nasrabadi N, Derafshi R. Effect of beverages on the hardness and tensile bond strength of temporary acrylic soft liners to acrylic resin denture base. J Dent (Shiraz) 2013;14:178-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(86)90022-9
  10. Dos Santos DM, da Silva EVF, Watanabe D, Bitencourt SB, Guiotti AM, Goiato MC. Effect of different acidic solutions on the optical behavior of lithium disilicate ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:430-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.023
  11. Neppelenbroek KH, Kuroishi E, Hotta J, Marques VR, Moffa EB, Soares S, Urban VM. Surface properties of multilayered, acrylic resin artificial teeth after immersion in staining beverages. J Appl Oral Sci 2015;23:376-82. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150054
  12. Consani RL, Folli BL, Nogueira MC, Correr AB, Mesquita MF. Effect of polymerization cycles on gloss, roughness, hardness and impact strength of acrylic resins. Braz Dent J 2016;27:176-80. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600733
  13. Fernandes FH, Orsi IA, Villabona CA. Effects of the peracetic acid and sodium hypochlorite on the colour stability and surface roughness of the denture base acrylic resins poly-merised by microwave and water bath methods. Gerodontology 2013;30:18-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00640.x
  14. Caneppele TM, Jeronymo RD, Di Nicolo R, de Araujo MA, Soares LE. In Vitro assessment of dentin erosion after immersion in acidic beverages: surface profile analysis and energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry study. Braz Dent J 2012;23:373-8.15. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000400011
  15. Soares LE, Soares AL, De Oliveira R, Nahorny S. The effects of acid erosion and remineralization on enamel and three different dental materials: FT-Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Microsc Res Tech 2016;79:646-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22679
  16. Poggio C, Dagna A, Chiesa M, Colombo M, Scribante A. Surface roughness of flowable resin composites eroded by acidic and alcoholic drinks. J Conserv Dent 2012;15:137-40. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.94581
  17. Colombo M, Poggio C, Lasagna A, Chiesa M, Scribante A. Vickers micro-hardness of new restorative CAD/CAM dental materials: Evaluation and comparison after exposure to acidic drink. Materials (Basel) 2019;12. pii: E1246.
  18. Bitencourt SB, Kanda RY, de Freitas Jorge C, Barao VAR, Sukotjo C, Wee AG, Goiato MC, Pesqueira AA. Long-term stainability of interim prosthetic materials in acidic/staining solutions. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:73-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12544
  19. Briso AL, Caruzo LP, Guedes AP, Catelan A, dos Santos PH. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness and microhardness of restorative materials submitted to erosive challenges. Oper Dent 2011;36:397-402. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-356-L
  20. Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulunk T, Guler E, Kurt S. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:118-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.004
  21. Omata Y, Uno S, Nakaoki Y, Tanaka T, Sano H, Yoshida S, Sidhu SK. Staining of hybrid composites with coffee, oolong tea, or red wine. Dent Mater J 2006;25:125-31. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.125
  22. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006;22:211-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.005
  23. Rutkunas V, Sabaliauskas V, Mizutani H. Effects of different food colorants and polishing techniques on color stability of provisional prosthetic materials. Dent Mater J 2010;29:167-76. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-075
  24. Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater 2011;27:97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.018
  25. Compagnoni MA, Barbosa DB, de Souza RF, Pero AC. The effect of polymerization cycles on porosity of microwaveprocessed denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:281-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.01.006
  26. Machado C, Rizzatti-Barbosa CM, Gabriotti MN, Joia FA, Ribeiro MC, Sousa RL. Influence of mechanical and chemical polishing in the solubility of acrylic resins polymerized by microwave irradiation and conventional water bath. Dent Mater 2004;20:565-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.09.001
  27. Dhir G, Berzins DW, Dhuru VB, Periathamby AR, Dentino A. Physical properties of denture base resins potentially resistant to Candida adhesion. J Prosthodont 2007;16:465-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00219.x

Cited by

  1. Thermal-cycling, simulated brushing, and beverages induced color changes and roughness of CAD/CAM poly (methyl methacrylate) denture resins vol.8, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac406e
  2. Optical and mechanical properties of conventional, milled and 3D-printed denture teeth vol.126, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105061