Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회지)

Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus brevis KU200019 and Synergistic Activity with Fructooligosaccharides in Antagonistic Activity against Foodborne Pathogens

  • Kariyawasam, Kariyawasam Majuwana Gamage Menaka Menike (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University) ;
  • Yang, Seo Jin (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Na-Kyoung (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University) ;
  • Paik, Hyun-Dong (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2020.01.28
  • Accepted : 2020.02.16
  • Published : 2020.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the probiotic properties of Lactobacillus brevis (L. brevis) KU200019 and the synergistic activity with prebiotics on antimicrobial activity, and the potential application as an adjunct culture in fermented dairy products. The commercial strain, L. brevis ATCC 14869 was used as reference strain. L. brevis KU200019 was showed higher viability in simulated gastric (99.38±0.21%) and bile (115.10±0.13%) conditions compared to reference strain. L. brevis KU200019 exhibited antimicrobial activity against various foodborne pathogens. The supplementation of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) enhanced viability of lactic acid bacteria (>8 Log CFU/mL) and antioxidant activity [2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical assay (DPPH) assay, 31.23±1.14%; 2,2-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) assay, 38.82±1.46%] in fermented skim milk during refrigerated storage. L. brevis KU200019 was distinguished from the reference strain by its higher probiotic potential, antimicrobial activity, and higher antioxidant activity in fermented milk. Therefore, L. brevis KU200019 with FOS was demonstrated promising properties for further application in fermented dairy products with enhanced safety and quality.

Keywords

Introduction

Probiotics are live microorganisms that impart various beneficial effects on the host, when consumed in an appropriate concentration (de Melo Pereira et al., 2018). The genus, Lactobacillus is the representative heterogeneous group of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The functional benefits of this genus are widely explored due to its physiological characteristics and genetic diversity (Montoro et al., 2016). Several Lactobacillus have been used as probiotics in functional foods and biotherapeutic agents for rendering multifactorial benefits to humans and other animals over the past decades (Ren et al., 2014). Although there are many commercial probiotic strains available in the market, novel probiotics have been identified with specific properties in past few years, especially those isolated from the traditional fermented foods (Martins et al., 2013).

Jeotgal or jeot is a salted and fermented Korean seafood that used as Korean cuisine to enhance the flavor or the taste of the food (Koo et al., 2016). Jeotgal is prepared from various types of seafood including oyster, shellfish, shrimp, and fish and also adding about 20%–30% (w/w) salt and subsequently undergo fermentation process which improves the palatability and the shelf life of the dish (Guan et al., 2011). Previous studies have reported the probiotic potential of the bacterium isolated from jeotgal, particularly adapt to resist acidic and high concentrations of bile salts that body imposes (Koo et al., 2016).

Jeotgal or jeot is a salted and fermented Korean seafood that used as Korean cuisine to enhance the flavor or the taste of the food (Koo et al., 2016). Jeotgal is prepared from various types of seafood including oyster, shellfish, shrimp, and fish and also adding about 20%–30% (w/w) salt and subsequently undergo fermentation process which improves the palatability and the shelf life of the dish (Guan et al., 2011). Previous studies have reported the probiotic potential of the bacterium isolated from jeotgal, particularly adapt to resist acidic and high concentrations of bile salts that body imposes (Koo et al., 2016).

The synergistic combination of probiotic and prebiotic found in products such as foods and supplements is known as “Synbiotic” (Adebola et al., 2014). Various combinations of synbiotic show therapeutic effects against diseases such as respiratory infections, diarrhea, allergy, and diabetes and some prebiotics showed anti-adhesive activities against enteropathogens (Shoaf et al., 2006). Further, the synergistic action of probiotics and prebiotics exhibited great efficacy compared to the use of either probiotic or prebiotic individually (Mohanty et al., 2018). Dairy products can be effectively used as a probiotic and prebiotic carrier due to their cohesive structure, pH, and fat content (Speranza et al., 2018). In addition, prebiotic may also incorporate to the food to enhance the quality, safety and functionality of the food. Some authors have reported the enhanced anti-mutagenic, antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-proliferative effect of synbiotic yoghurt (Sah et al., 2015, 2016).

This study was aimed to investigate the probiotic potential of L. brevis KU200019, an isolate from Korean jeotgal and to evaluate the synergistic interaction with various commercial prebiotics to enhance the antagonistic activity against foodborne pathogens, as well as to evaluate the potential use of novel strain in a fermented-synbiotic dairy product in order to enhance its functionality.

Material and Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

The probiotic strain used in this study was the Korean jeotgal isolate, L. brevis KU200019. The organism was identified by 16S rRNA sequencing performed by Bionics Inc. (Seoul, Korea). The sequencing results were analyzed by GenBank database from the website http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov by using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). The commercial strain, L. brevis ATCC 14869 used for comparative analysis. The L. brevis strains were propagated and maintained in MRS (de Man, Rogosa, and Shape, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) broth at 37℃.

Survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions

The tolerance in simulated gastric conditions of the L. brevis strains were evaluated as method of Son et al. (2017b). The L. brevis strains were cultured in 10 mL MRS broth at 37℃ for 18 h. The MRS broth was gastric conditioned by adding 0.3% (w/v) of pepsin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and changing the pH of the media to 2.5 by using 0.1 M HCl. One milliliter of the bacterial culture was suspended in 9 mL gastric conditioned MRS broth and incubated at 37℃ for 3 h.

To evaluate bile salt tolerance, L. brevis strains were cultured in 10 mL of MRS broth at 37℃ for 18 h. One milliliter of the bacterial culture was suspended in 9 mL of MRS broth supplemented with 0.3% (w/v) oxgall (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) followed by incubation at 37℃ for 24 h.

The survival rate was calculated using the following formula:

\(\text { Survival rate }(\%)=\frac{\log \mathrm{N}}{\log \mathrm{N}_{0}} \times 100\)

where, N and N0 represents the viable cell count after and before incubation, respectively.

Enzyme activity

The enzyme activity of L. brevis strains was measured using the API ZYM kit (BioMerieux, Lyon, France). The bacterial cell suspension (65 µL) was inoculated to each cupule of the API ZYM strips and incubated at 37℃ for 4 h. The ZYM A and B reagents were added to each of the cupules and the enzyme activity was determined based on the color intensity; 0 (no activity) to 5 (≥40 nM).

Antibacterial activity of L. brevis strains against foodborne pathogens

The antagonistic activity of L. brevis strains against Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 15313, Escherichia coli O157:H4 FRIK 125, Staphylococcus aureus KCCM 40511, and Salmonella Enteritidis ATCC 13076 was evaluated following the methods of Son et al. (2017a). The LAB suspension (10 µL) was spotted on the MRS agar plates and incubated at 37℃ for 18 h. The MRS agar was overlaid with 9 mL of soft nutrient agar inoculated with 1 mL of pathogenic strain (1×106 CFU/mL). The plates were incubated at 37℃ for 18 h and the inhibition zone diameter was measured.

Autoaggregation and coaggregation properties

Autoaggregation and coaggregation assays were modified slightly from Jeon et al. (2017). The overnight culture of bacterial cells was harvested by centrifugation at 6,000×g for 10 min at 4℃. The harvested cells were suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) to achieve an optical density (OD) of 0.3±0.02 at 600 nm (OD0). The LAB suspension (4 mL) was infcubated at 37℃ for 24 h. The absorbance of the samples was measured at 600 nmafter 4 h and 24 h (ODt). The autoaggregation value was calculated using the following formula:

\(\text { Autoaggregation }(\%)=\left(1-\frac{\mathrm{OD}_{0}}{\mathrm{OD}_{\mathrm{t}}}\right) \times 100\)

For coaggregation assay, 2 mL LAB strain was mixed with 2 mL pathogenic strain and incubated at 37℃ for 24 h. The absorbance of LAB (ODL), pathogenic strain (ODP), and LAB-pathogen mixture (ODmix) was measured at 600 nm after 4 h and 24 h. The coaggregation value was calculated using the following formula:

\(\text { Coaggregation }(\%)=\left(1-\frac{O D_{\operatorname{mix}}}{\left(\frac{O D_{P}+O D_{L}}{2}\right)}\right) \times 100\)

Cell surface hydrophobicity

The cell surface hydrophobicity was assessed by measuring the bacterial adhesion to the hydrocarbons following the method described by Lee et al. (2015). Briefly, the bacterial cells were suspended in PBS to achieve an OD of 0.5±0.02 at 600 nm (OD0). Then 3 mL of bacterial suspension was mixed with 1 mL xylene and vortexed. The vortexed samples were incubated at 37℃ for 20 min till the two phases separated. The absorbance of the aqueous phase was measured at 600 nm (ODt) and the cell surface hydrophobicity was calculated using the following formula:

\(\text { Cell surface hydrophobicity }(\%)=\left(1-\frac{O D_{t}}{O D_{0}}\right) \times 100\)

Screening of prebiotics using growth assay

Six commercial prebiotics used in this study, lactulose (4-O-β-D-galactopyranosyl-D-fructose (C12H22O11), fructooligosaccharide [FOS, (C6H10O5)n (n>10)], xylitol (C5H12O5), inulin (C6H10O5)n (n~36), and dextran (C6H10O5)n (Shinbhi International, Seoul, Korea). The effect of prebiotics on the growth of L. brevis was evaluated as described previously (Bevilacqua et al., 2016). Briefly, MRS medium without glucose (MB cell, Seoul, Korea) was supplemented with 2% (w/w) prebiotic compounds, 2% (w/w) glucose (positive control), or without carbon source (negative control). Following, inoculated with 6 Log CFU/mL of each L. brevis strain and incubated for 48 h. L. brevis growth was evaluated through the measurement of absorbance at 600 nm. Data were interpreted as growth index (GI), through the equation proposed by Bevilacqua et al. (2016).

\(\mathrm{GI}=\frac{\mathrm{OD}_{\mathrm{s}}}{\mathrm{OD}_{c}} \times 100\)

Where, ODs is the absorbance of the samples with different prebiotics, and ODc is the absorbance of the positive control. In addition, pH of the sample was evaluated periodically by a pH meter (inoLab pH 7110, Xylem Analytics, Weilheim, Germany). Prebiotics was selected based on their synergistic effect on GI for further study.

Adherence ability of L. brevis stains to HT-29 cells in the presence of prebiotics

The human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines (HT-29, KCLB 30038) was supplied from the Korean Cell Line Bank (KCLB, Seoul, Korea). The HT-29 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), and 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin (Hyclone) at 37℃ in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The adherence ability of L. brevis strains to HT-29 cell lines was performed as described previously (Yang et al., 2019). Aliquot of bacterial suspension 1×108 CFU/mL was added to confluent HT-29 monolayers and subsequently, supplemented with prebiotics (20 mg/mL) and incubated at 37℃ for 2 h. Samples either added with L. brevis strains or prebiotics were considered as control samples. To determine the number (CFU/mL) of L. brevis strains that adhered to the HT-29 cells, the bacterial cells were harvested with 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich), and serially diluted in PBS and plated on the MRS agar plates.

Inhibition of pathogen adherence to HT-29 cells in the presence of prebiotics

The ability of L. brevis strains and prebiotic to inhibit the adhesion of the pathogen to the HT-29 cell line was evaluated following the method of Jang et al. (2019). The confluent HT-29 monolayers were inoculated with 1:1 mixture of pathogenic bacteria and L. brevis (1×108 CFU/mL) and incubated at 37℃ for 2 h in a CO2 incubator. The prebiotics (final concentration, 20 mg/mL) were added to each well immediately before incubation. Samples without LAB or prebiotics were considered as control. To determine the number (CFU/mL) of pathogens that adhered to the HT-29 cells, the bacterial cells were harvested with 1% Triton X-100 and serially diluted in PBS and plated on the Listeria selective agar and eosin methylene blue agar (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for detecting L. monocytogenes and E. coli, respectively. The plates were incubated at 37℃ for 24 h.

Application of L. brevis strains in dairy product

The probiotics were evaluated for potential application in synbiotic dairy products by cultivating in skim milk. Strains were activated in MRS broth at 37℃ for 24 h and harvested by centrifugation at 6,000×g for 10 min at 4℃. The L. brevis strains (8– 8.5 Log CFU/mL) were inoculated into sterilized skim milk powder (12%) supplemented with either FOS, lactulose or xylitol (2%). Skim milk without prebiotic addition was used as control. Samples were stored at 4℃ for 28 days and cell cultivability was evaluated in 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days by spread plating in MRS agar and incubating at 37℃ for 48 h.

Five types of fermented skim milk samples were prepared by co-culturing with commercial starter culture (Culture Systems, Mishawaka, IN, USA) and L. brevis KU200019 or L. brevis ATCC 14689 (8–8.5 Log CFU/mL). The samples were incubated at 42℃ till the pH drops to 4.0–4.5. Samples were labeled as, fermented skim milk added with; starter culture (C), starter culture and L. brevis ATCC 14689 (S1), starter culture and L. brevis KU200019 (S2), starter culture, L. brevis ATCC 14689, and FOS (S3), and starter culture, L. brevis KU200019, and FOS (S4). Samples were stored at 4℃ for further analysis.

After 7-day water soluble extracts (WSE) of fermented skim milk samples were prepared as described previously with slight modifications (Sah et al., 2014). Fermented skim milk samples were centrifuged at 22,600×g at 4℃ for 30 min. The supernatant was filtered using a 0.45-µm membrane filter and freeze dried in a freeze drier and all the lyophilized samples were kept at –80℃ for further analysis. The protein content (mg/mL) of each WSE was estimated using a Bradford assay with a BSA (0.1–2.0 mg/mL) standard.

The antioxidant activity of WSE (0.5 mg of protein/mL) was analyzed by DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical) and ABTS [2,2-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) di-ammonium salt] radical scavenging assays as described previously (Kariyawasam et al., 2019). Radical scavenging activity was modulated as below formula,

\(\text { Radical scavenging activity }(\%)=\left(1-\frac{O D_{s}}{O D_{c}}\right) \times 100\)

ODc and ODs is the absorbance of control (distilled water) and samples, respectively.

Statistical analysis

The experiments were performed in triplicates and the data are presented as mean±SD. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS statistics 20 (SPSS/IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA). The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or independent samples t-test. A difference was considered significant at p≤0.05.

Results and Discussion

Survival in simulated gastrointestinal tract (GIT) conditions

The probiotics must adapt and maintain their functions even under stress conditions. The survival rate of L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevis KU200019 in acidic pH (pH 2.5 and 0.3% pepsin) condition was 94.20±0.50% and 99.38±0.21%, respectively (data not shown). Similarly, in previous studies, probiotics isolated from jeotgal showed 98.76%–99.37% acid tolerance values (Akther et al., 2017).

The survival rate of L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevis KU200019 in the presence of bile salt (0.3% oxgall) was 102.45±0.53% and 115.10±0.13%, respectively (data not shown). The survival rate of the L. brevis KU15006 strain isolated from Korean kimchi was 105.24% in the presence of bile salt (0.3% oxgall), which was lower than that of L. brevis KU200019 (Son et al., 2017a). Thus, the high survival rate of L. brevis KU200019 in the presence of acids and bile salts indicates its ability to survive and colonize in the gut to be considered as a potential probiotic.

Enzyme activity

The toxicity of the probiotics was assessed by measuring the production of enterotoxin enzymes, such as α-chymotrypsin, β-glucuronidase, or N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase that are associated with intestinal diseases (de Melo Pereira et al., 2018). The results revealed that both the strains did not produce the enterotoxin enzymes (Table 1).

Table 1. Enzyme activities of Lactobacillus brevis strains

0, 0 nmol; 1, 5 nmol; 2, 10 nmol; 3, 20 nmol; 4, 30 nmol; 5, ≥40 nmol.

Antibacterial activity of L. brevis strains against foodborne pathogens

The selective antagonistic activity of probiotic strains against foodborne pathogens can have applications in the food industry to prevent food spoilage. In this study, L. brevis strains inhibited the growth of L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313, E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125, S. aureus KCCM 40511, and S. Enteritidis ATCC 13076. The antibacterial activity of L. brevis KU200019 was higher than that of commercial strain. The highest antagonistic activity of L. brevis KU200019 was observed against L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 (34.5±1.5 mm) followed by S. aureus KCCM 40511 (33.5±3.54 mm), S. Enteritidis (30±3.54 mm), and E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 (29±0.60 mm). However, L. brevis ATCC 14869 exhibited the highest antagonistic activity against S. Enteritidis (29±2.60 mm), followed by L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 (27.5±0.71 mm), S. aureus KCCM 40511 (26±1.41 mm), and E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 (25±1.41 mm). The antibacterial activity of LAB may be due to the production of organic acids, diacetyl compounds, hydrogen peroxide, and bacteriocin-like peptides (Kariyawasam et al., 2019). Furthermore, the difference in antagonistic activity can be explained by the level and type of antimicrobial agents produced during the fermentation process by the LAB strains (Gad et al., 2016). Thus, novel strain showed high antimicrobial activity against various foodborne pathogens. Particularly, L. brevis KU200019 was shown high antagonistic activity against L. monocytogenes and the value was significantly higher than the that of the commercial strain, L. rhamnosus GG showed 22.33±0.58 mm (Jang et al., 2019). This indicated the potential use of this organism as an adjunct culture in food industry. Particularly, the products such as fresh cheese and yoghurt those are highly vulnerable to contamination by L. monocytagenes.

Autoaggregation and coaggregation properties

The autoaggregation and coaggregation properties of the probiotics with the potential enteric pathogens can be used as a preliminary screening marker for the selection of the probiotic strain for administration to humans and for colonizing property in intestinal tract (de Melo Pereira et al., 2018). The autoaggregation property ensures that the probiotic reaches a high cell density in the GIT and subsequently contribute to the adhesion mechanisms (Ogunremi et al., 2015). The autoaggregation values are presented in Table 2. The autoaggregation values of novel strain was distinguished from the L. brevis strains isolated from other fermented fish product like Hentak (Aarti et al., 2017). Furthermore, autoaggregation value of L. brevis KU200019 was higher than L. brevis ATCC 14869 which indicates the high colonization activity of novel probiotic in gut (p<0.05; Table 2).

Table 2. Autoaggregation, coaggregation, and hydrophobicity of Lactobacillus brevis strains

a,b Means within a same column with different superscripts differ (p<0.05).

All values are the mean of 3 replicates (mean±SD).

Coaggregation is also a probiotic property that enables the pathogen agglomeration with the probiotic cells, which results in the elimination of pathogen from GIT through feces. The strongest coaggregation was observed between L. brevis KU200019 and L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 (41.21±2.61%) followed by L. brevis KU200019 and E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 (32.70±4.03%; Table 2). The coaggregation value for L. brevis ATCC 14869 was lower than that for L. brevis KU200019.

Cell surface hydrophobicity

General bacteria with high hydrophobic capacity have high adherence ability to intestinal mucosa. The correlation between the adhesion ability and hydrophobicity of bacterial surface was reported by Murtini et al. (2016). The hydrophobicity of the L. brevis KU200019 was higher than that of the L. brevis ATCC 14869 (Table 2). This indicated that the high adherence of L. brevis KU200019 to the host epithelial cells. Hydrophobicity value of L. brevis KU200019 was distinguished from hydrophobicity values of L. brevis strains isolated from jeotgal by other authors. The hydrophobicity value for L. brevis G1 and L. brevis KU15006 were varied from 47%–48% (Son et al., 2017a).

Screening of prebiotics using growth assay

Growth of L. brevis strains in laboratory medium supplemented with prebiotics (2%) was evaluated and lowest growth was observed in xylitol and negative control (8%–9%). Partial growth of L. brevis strains was observed in presence of inulin and dextran (18.8%–21.3%). Lactulose was positively influenced growth of L. brevis strains, showed GI values 70.07% and 75.32% for L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevis KU200019, respectively. Moreover, presence of FOS showed highest GI value (~100%; Fig. 1). Nevertheless, concerning the interpretation of GI values it can be concluded that FOS can be provided the optimal growth conditions for LAB growth (Bevilacqua et al., 2016). In addition, pH of inulin, dextran, and xylitol supplemented laboratory media were reduced slightly after 48 h (0.5–0.8), whereas positive control and FOS supplemented samples showed pH 3–4 reduction after 48 h (data not shown). Effective utilization of FOS and glucose by L. brevis strains may cause to produce microbial metabolic products including short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and lactose and these organic acids production might have caused for declining pH (Cremon et al., 2018). These findings are concurred with the fact that selective utilization of prebiotics by LAB.

Fig. 1. Growth index of Lactobacillus brevis strains after 48 h at 37℃. The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). Different letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different (p<0.05). Negative control, MRS medium without glucose, FOS, fructooligosachride.

Concerning the GI results, FOS and lactulose showed the better features for future synbiotic application. Although xylitol did not have positive influence for L. brevis growth, xylitol was also used in further experiments for comparative analysis.

Adherence ability of L. brevis strains to HT-29 cells in the presence of prebiotics

The adhesion of the potential probiotic candidates to the intestinal mucus and to the enterocytes is important for the colonization of the host intestinal tract (de Melo Pereira et al., 2018). The adhesion of L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevis KU200019 to HT-29 cells was 73.26±0.33% and 77.25±0.22%, respectively. Difference in the adhesion values can be explained by variations in the physicochemical properties of the probiotic cell surface such as autoaggregation and hydrophobic capacities. FOS supplementation significantly enhanced the adhesion of L. brevis ATCC 14869 (80.45±0.79%) and L. brevis KU200019 (88.14±0.98%) to the HT-29 cells (p0.05; Fig. 2). The enhanced adherence in FOS supplemented samples can be explained by the fact that, fermentation of oligosaccharides could produce the SCFAs, supply the required energy for the proliferation of probiotics and modulate the colonic microbial population and activity (Mohanty et al., 2018).

Fig. 2. Adherence of LAB strains to HT-29 cells. The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). Different letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different (p<0.05). LAB, lactic acid bacteria; L. brevis, Lactobacillus brevis; FOS, fructooligosaccharides.

Inhibition of pathogen adherence to HT-29 cells presence of prebiotics

The cell count of L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 and E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 that adhere to HT-29 cells was 5.80±0.07 Log CFU/mL and 6.06±0.12 Log CFU/mL, respectively (Fig. 3). The number of pathogens adhere to HT-29 cells was reduced when the pathogens were co-incubated with the L. brevis strains (p<0.05). The cell count of L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 that adhere to HT-29 cells reduced when co-incubated with L. brevis ATCC 14869 (3.22 Log CFU/mL) or L. brevis KU200019 (2.79 CFU/mL). Similarly, the cell count of E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 that adhere to HT-29 cells reduced to 4.89 Log CFU/mL and 4.16 Log CFU/mL, when co-incubated with L. brevis ATCC 14869 or L. brevis KU200019, respectively. However, L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 and E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 adhesion inhibition ability of novel strain was higher than that of the previous authors. Jang et al. (2019) reported 0.12 CFU/mL and 0.59 CFU/mL reduction of adhesion inhibition for L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 and E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125, respectively when co-incubated with L. brevis KU15153. This anti-adhesion property may be due to the competition for the binding sites on the epithelial cells and available nutrients between the probiotics and pathogens (de Melo Pereira et al., 2018). When prebiotic tested alone for adherence inhibition, treatment with FOS resulted in an adherence inhibition of 3.78 Log CFU/mL and 5.24 Log CFU/mL for L. monocytogenes and E. coli, respectively. The adherence inhibition of FOS was higher than the other prebiotics (p<0.05). The adherence inhibition of pathogens by prebiotic oligosaccharides are mediated by various mechanisms. First, metabolism of prebiotic oligosaccharide by LAB results in the production of antagonistic agents that inhibit the growth of the pathogens (Shoaf et al., 2006). Second, prebiotic oligosaccharides exhibited anti-adhesive activity by mimicking the host cell receptor sites. The intestinal pathogens recognize and bind to these mimicked receptor sites and subsequently prevent the binding of pathogenic bacteria to the intestinal cells (Kunz et al., 2000). Moreover, prebiotic oligosaccharide treated along with L. brevis stains and subsequently, adherence inhibition was measured. The cell count of L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313 that adhere to HT-29 cells was reduced to 2.86 Log CFU/mL and 2.40 Log CFU/mL, when cultured in a medium supplement with FOS and co-incubated with L. brevis ATCC 14869 or L. brevis KU200019, respectively. Similarly, the cell count of E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125 that adhere to HT-29 cells was reduced to 4.65 Log CFU/mL and 3.85 Log CFU/mL, when cultured in a medium supplement with FOS and co-incubated with L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevis KU200019, respectively. Therefore, the results demonstrated that synergetic interactions among prebiotic oligosaccharide (FOS) and L. brevis KU200019 has highest adherence inhibition of pathogens rather administration them individually (p<0.05).

Fig. 3. Adherence of (A) L. monocytogenes (LM) and (B) E. coli (EC) to the HT-29 cells in presence of LAB strains and prebiotics. The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). Different letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different (p<0.05). LB14869, Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 14869; LB200019, L. brevis KU200019; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; FOS, fructooligosaccharides.

Application of L. brevis strains in dairy product

The strains were evaluated for their ability to use as a probiotic in dairy products and effect of prebiotics on strains cultivability by culturing L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevis KU200019 in skim milk supplemented with or without prebiotics during 28 days of storage at 4℃ (Fig. 4). The initial count of L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevis KU200019 were 8.0 to 8.3 Log CFU/mL in all samples. The bacterial counts were increased until 7 days of storage in all samples while highest viability was observed in FOS added skim milk samples The values for L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevis KU200019 were 8.59±0.17 Log CFU/mL and 8.86±0.07 Log CFU/mL, respectively. However, LAB count continued to decrease after 14 days. The steep decline of L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevis KU200019 were observed in control sample and skim milk added with xylitol, whereas the steady decrease was observed in skim milk added with lactulose and FOS. Moreover, the skim milk with FOS showed lowest reduction of bacterial count and L. brevis KU200019 count was above 8 Log CFU/mL throughout the storage period. At the end of the shelf-life (28 days) L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevis KU200019 in FOS added skim milk were 7.18±0.15 Log CFU/mL and 8.04±0.16 Log CFU/mL, respectively. Concerning the skim milk, prebiotics showed a positive effect on maintaining probiotic viability. Noteworthy, L. brevis ATCC 14869 and L. brevis KU200019 cultivability was positively influenced by lactulose and FOS. Some authors suggested that protective effect of prebiotics to maintain the probiotic viability (Speranza et al., 2018). Furthermore, high viability in skim milk added with FOS can be explained by the protective role of the fructans by interactions with membrane phospholipids to maintain the stability of the cytoplasmic membrane of probiotics (Vereyken et al., 2003).

Fig. 4. Bacterial count of (A) Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 14869 and (B) L. brevis KU200019 in skim milk with or without prebiotic compounds during storage at 4℃ for 28 days. The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). FOS, fructooligosaccharides.

Antioxidant activity of the fermented skim milk samples were evaluated after 7 days. All samples showed varying degrees of radical scavenging capacities for DPPH and ABTS assays (Fig. 5), indicating differences in polarity, hydrolysis of proteins, and ability to donate atoms and electrons of antioxidant bio-factors (Yilmaz-Ersan et al., 2018). Co-culturing of probiotics with starter cultures resulted in enhanced antioxidant activity (Fig. 5). The antioxidant activity of S2 and S3 were differ in both assays (p<0.05). This indicates that antioxidant capacity of hydrolysates for the same substrate, depends on the types of enzyme from LAB. This may be due to specific proteases are involved in the hydrolysis of specific peptide bonds (Sah et al., 2014). Nevertheless, supplementation of FOS has enhanced the antioxidant activity of fermented skim milk samples. The values for S3 and S4 was (1) DPPH assay: 28.14±1.64% and 31.23±1.14% and (2) ABTS assay: 34.36±2.04% and 38.82±1.46%, respectively. The strong scavenging activity in prebiotic supplemented samples may be due to enhanced viability and activity of probiotics. This finding is in agreement with Sah et al. (2015) who observed enhanced antioxidant activities in inulin or pineapple peel supplemented yoghurt samples.

Fig. 5. Antioxidant activity of fermented skim milk samples after 7 days. Different letters on the top of the bars are significnatly different (p<0.05). Fermented skim milk added with C, strater culture; S1, strater culture and Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 14869; S2, strater culture and L. brevis KU200019; S3, strater culture, L. brevis ATCC 14869, and FOS; S4, strater culture, L. brevis KU200019, and FOS. The results are the mean of three replicates (mean±SD). DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, 2,2-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid; FOS, fructooligosaccharides.

Conclusion

The present study revealed that L. brevis KU200019 isolated from jeotgal showed dominant probiotic properties compared to commercial strain. L. brevis KU200019 exhibited higher survival rate in gastric conditions and antimicrobial activity against various foodborne pathogens including L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313, E. coli O157:H4 FRIK 125, S. aureus KCCM 40511, and S. Enteritidis ATCC 13076 compared to L. brevis ATCC 14869. Moreover, synergistic interactions between L. brevis KU200019 and FOS markedly enhanced the adherence inhibition of foodborne pathogens to HT-29 cells and confirming the potential use in modulate the gut microbiota and prevention of pathogen-associated diarrhea. Furthermore, high survival rate over 8 Log CFU/mL in skim milk and high antioxidant activity in fermented skim milk confirmed the potential use of L. brevis KU200019 as an adjunct culture in synbiotic-fermented dairy products to enhance the safety and quality.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Korean government for offering a scholarship position for K. M. G. Menaka M. Kariyawasam under the Korean Government Global Scholarship program.

Ethics Approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

  1. Aarti C, Khusro A, Varghese R, Arasu MV, Agastian P, Al-Dhabi NA, Ilavenil S, Choi KC. 2017. In vitro studies on probiotic and antioxidant properties of Lactobacillus brevis strain LAP2 isolated from Hentak, a fermented fish product of North-East India. LWT-Food Sci Technol 86:438-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.07.055
  2. Adebola OO, Corcoran O, Morgan WA. 2014. Synbiotics: The impact of potential prebiotics inulin, lactulose and lactobionic acid on the survival and growth of Lactobacilli probiotics. J Funct Foods 10:75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2014.05.010
  3. Akther F, Le B, Chung G, Yang SH. 2017. Optimizing the fermentation condition of low salted squid Jeotgal by lactic acid bacteria with enhanced antioxidant activity. J Appl Biol Chem 60:391-402. https://doi.org/10.3839/jabc.2017.060
  4. Bevilacqua A, Sinigaglia M, Speranza B, Altieri C. 2016. Effect of prebiotic compounds on the growth and survival of Bifidobacteria in a laboratory medium. Adv J Food Sci Technol 11:770-774. https://doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.11.2790
  5. Cremon C, Barbaro MR, Ventura M, Barbara G. 2018. Pre- and probiotic overview. Curr Opin Pharmacol 43:87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2018.08.010
  6. de Melo Pereira GV, de Oliveira Coelho B, Magalhaes Junior AI, Thomaz-Soccol V, Soccol CR. 2018. How to select a probiotic? A review and update of methods and criteria. Biotechnol Adv 36:2060-2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.09.003
  7. Gad SA, Abd El-Baky RM, Ahmed ABF, Gad GFM. 2016. In vitro evaluation of probiotic potential of five lactic acid bacteria and their antimicrobial activity against some enteric and food-borne pathogens. African J Microbiol Res 10:400-409. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2015.7781
  8. Guan L, Cho KH, Lee JH. 2011. Analysis of the cultivable bacterial community in jeotgal, a Korean salted and fermented seafood, and identification of its dominant bacteria. Food Microbiol 28:101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.09.001
  9. Jang HJ, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2019. Probiotic characterization of Lactobacillus brevis KU15153 showing antimicrobial and antioxidant effect isolated from kimchi. Food Sci Biotechnol 28:1521-1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00576-x
  10. Jeon HL, Lee NK, Yang SJ, Kim WS, Paik HD. 2017. Probiotic characterization of Bacillus subtilis P223 isolated from kimchi. Food Sci Biotechnol 26:1641-1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-017-0148-5
  11. Kariyawasam KMGMM, Jeewanthi RKC, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2019. Characterization of cottage cheese using Weissella cibaria D30: Physicochemical, antioxidant, and antilisterial properties. J Dairy Sci 102:3887-3893. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15360
  12. Koo OK, Lee SJ, Chung KR, Jang DJ, Yang HJ, Kwon DY. 2016. Korean traditional fermented fish products: Jeotgal. J Ethn Foods 3:107-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2016.06.004
  13. Kunz C, Rudloff S, Baier W, Klein N, Strobel S. 2000. Oligosaccharides in human milk: Structural, functional, and metabolic aspects. Annu Rev Nut 20:699-722. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.20.1.699
  14. Lee NK, Han KJ, Son SH, Eom SJ, Lee SK, Paik HD. 2015. Multifunctional effect of probiotic Lactococcus lactis KC24 isolated from kimchi. LWT-Food Sci Technol 64:1036-1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.07.019
  15. Martins EMF, Ramos AM, Vanzela ESL, Stringheta, PC, de Oliveira Pinto CL, Martins JM. 2013. Products of vegetable origin: A new alternative for the consumption of probiotic bacteria. Food Res Int 51:764-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.01.047
  16. Mohanty D, Misra S, Mohapatra S, Sahu PS. 2018. Prebiotics and synbiotics: Recent concepts in nutrition. Food Biosci 26:152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2018.10.008
  17. Montoro BP, Benomar N, Lerma LL, Gutierrez, SC Galvez A, Abriouel H. 2016. Fermented alorena table olives as a source of potential probiotic Lactobacillus pentosus strains. Front Microbiol 7:1583.
  18. Murtini D, Aryantini NPD, Sujaya IN, Urashima T. Fukuda K. 2016. Effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides consumption on the growth and expression profile of cell surface-associated proteins of a potential probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus FSMM15. Biosci Microb Food H 35:41-49.
  19. Ogunremi OR, Sanni AI, Agrawal R. 2015. Probiotic potentials of yeasts isolated from some cereal-based Nigerian traditional fermented food products. J Appl Microbiol 119:797-808. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12875
  20. Ren D, Li C, Qin Y, Yin R, Du S, Ye F, Liu C, Liu H, Wang M, Li Y, Sun Y, Li X, Tian M, Jin N. 2014. In vitro evaluation of the probiotic and functional potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from fermented food and human intestine. Anaerobe 30:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.07.004
  21. Sah BNP, Vasiljevic T, McKechnie S, Donkor ON. 2014. Effect of probiotics on antioxidant and antimutagenic activities of crude peptide extract from yogurt. Food Chem 156:264-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.01.105
  22. Sah BN, Vasiljevic T, McKechnie S, Donkor ON. 2015. Effect of refrigerated storage on probiotic viability and the production and stability of antimutagenic and antioxidant peptides in yogurt supplemented with pineapple peel. J Dairy Sci 98:5905-5916. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9450
  23. Sah BNP, Vasiljevic T, McKechnie S, Donkor ON. 2016. Antibacterial and antiproliferative peptides in synbiotic yogurt: Release and stability during refrigerated storage. J Dairy Sci 99:4233-4242. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10499
  24. Shoaf K, Mulvey GL, Armstrong GD, Hutkins RW. 2006. Prebiotic galactooligosaccharides reduce adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to tissue culture cells. Infect Immun 74:6920-6928. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01030-06
  25. Son SH, Jeon HL, Jeon EB, Lee NK, Park YS, Kang DK, Paik HD. 2017a. Potential probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum Ln4 from kimchi: Evaluation of $\beta$-galactosidase and antioxidant activities. LWT-Food Sci Technol 85:181-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.07.018
  26. Son SH, Jeon HL, Yang SJ, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2017b. In vitro characterization of Lactobacillus brevis KU15006, an isolate from kimchi, reveals anti-adhesion activity against foodborne pathogens and antidiabetic properties. Microb Pathog 112:135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.09.053
  27. Speranza B, Campaniello D, Monacis N, Bevilacqua A, Sinigaglia M, Corbo MR. 2018. Functional cream cheese supplemented with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis DSM 10140 and Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 20016 and prebiotics. Food Microbiol 72:16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2017.11.001
  28. Vereyken IJ, Chupin V, Islamov A, Kuklin A, Hincha DK, de Kruijff B. 2003. The effect of fructan on the phospholipid organization in the dry state. Biophys J 85:3058-3065. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74724-9
  29. Yang SJ, Lee JE, Lim SM, Kim YJ, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2019. Antioxidant and immune-enhancing effects of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 200655 isolated from kimchi. Food Sci Biotechnol 28:491-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0473-3
  30. Yilmaz-Ersan L, Ozcan T, Akpinar-Bayizit A, Sahin S. 2018. Comparison of antioxidant capacity of cow and ewe milk kefirs. J Dairy Sci 101:3788-3798. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13871

Cited by

  1. Isolation of Bile Salt Hydrolase and Uricase Producing Lactobacillus brevis SF121 from Pak Sian Dong (Fermented Spider Plant) for using as Probiotics vol.14, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.22207/jpam.14.3.10
  2. Lyophilized cell-free supernatants of Lactobacillus isolates exhibited antibiofilm, antioxidant, and reduces nitric oxide activity in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells vol.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12586
  3. In Vivo Evaluation of Immune-Enhancing Activity of Red Gamju Fermented by Probiotic Levilactobacillus brevis KU15154 in Mice vol.10, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020253
  4. Lactobacillus fermentum SMFM2017-NK4 Isolated from Kimchi Can Prevent Obesity by Inhibiting Fat Accumulation vol.10, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040772
  5. Prophylactic effects of probiotics on respiratory viruses including COVID-19: a review vol.30, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-021-00913-z
  6. Technical requirements for cultured meat production: a review vol.63, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e45
  7. Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Pecorino di Farindola Cheese and Manufacturing with a Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Autochthonous Culture vol.11, pp.17, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11177897
  8. Probiotic Characteristics of Lactobacillus brevis KT38-3 Isolated from an Artisanal Tulum Cheese vol.41, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2021.e49