DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Economics of Antagonistic Conflict Between Political Forces in Korea: Expansion

한국의 정치세력 간 적대적 갈등의 경제학: 확장

  • Lee, Jongmin (Division of Economics and Information Statistics, Kangwon National University)
  • 이종민 (강원대학교 경제.정보통계학부)
  • Received : 2020.08.31
  • Accepted : 2020.09.21
  • Published : 2020.09.30

Abstract

Purpose - Against the backdrop of the recent intense political conflict in Korea's political circles, it is to reveal from an economic point of view the hidden aspects behind the hostile conflict between the two political forces. Design/methodology/approach - This paper is not a normative study to find a solution to political conflict, but a positive study to reveal the mechanism of reciprocity that exists between the two parties of conflict in real politics. Therefore, the analysis is based on game theory methodology. Findings - It is shown that the ruling party should choose a level of preemptive response that is neither insufficient nor excessive if it aims to avoid radical anti-government struggles by opposition parties. We also find that even if the chances of success of the opposition's radical offensive struggle are low, the use of that strategy is not necessarily reduced. In addition, we have obtained comparative static results that do not deviate much from our intuition. What's interesting is that unlike our intuition that the choice of the method will be indifferent if the marginal effects of radical and normal methods of struggle are the same, the opposition party rather chooses the normal method of struggle more often. Research implications or Originality - In forming the analytical model, it reflected the support of the general public following the opposition's struggle against the ruling party in order to capture real politics well in the conflict between the two opposing parties.

Keywords

References

  1. 김이배, 전규안, 박상형 (2017년 11월), "사회성과에 대한 재무제표의 작성과 표시 개정안", SK텔레콤주식회사
  2. 고상두 외 편 (2016), 사회적 갈등과 정치적 소통, 서울:오름.
  3. 권혁주 (2016), "한국의 사회갈등과 사회통합 방안: 사회구조적 관점에서", 행정논총, 54(2), 93-116.
  4. 김두환 (2005), "사회갈등해결에서 숙의적 시민참여와 대안적 분쟁해결 접근비교", 시민사회와 NGO, 3(1), 143-171.
  5. 김영세 (2012), 정치게임과 공공경제, 서울: 율곡출판사.
  6. 박상필 (2000), "이익집단 갈등과 사회자본: 경실련의 한약분쟁 조정사례연구", 한국행정학보, 34(2), 121-138.
  7. 박천오, 서우선 (2004), "한국 지방의화와 집행기관 간 갈등요인과 개선방안에 관한 실증연구", 한국행정학보, 38(4), 107-124.
  8. 배응환 (2005), "로컬 거버넌스: 갈등에서 협력으로", 지방행정연구, 19(2), 187-215.
  9. 송복 (1997), 한국사회의 갈등구조, 서울: 경문사.
  10. 이병량, 김서용, 전영평 (2008), "한국 사회갈등구조의 진단과 해석: 수준, 원인, 대안을 중심으로", 한국공공관리학보, 22(4), 49-72.
  11. 이선우 외 (2001), "영월 다목적댐 건설사업의 협상론적 제해서: 정책갈등 해결의 모색", 한국지방자치학회보, 13(2), 23-252.
  12. 이종민, 윤보현, 이윤복 (2020), 경제.경영수학, 서울: 도서출판 청람.
  13. 이종민 (2019), "정부와 NGO간의 갈등관계에 대한 이론적 분석모형의 탐색", 한국공공관리학보, 33(3), 135-154.
  14. 이선향, 이종민 (2020), "한국의 정치세력 간 정치갈등: 게임이론적 접근", 사회과학 담론과 정책, 13(1), 47-67.
  15. 정태석 (2011), "적대의 다원화와 민주주의적 헤게모니", 급진민주주의 리뷰, 창간호, 23-245.
  16. 조희연 외(2008), 복합적 갈등 속의 한국민주주의, 서울: 한울.
  17. 주재복 (2001), "지방정부간 정책갈등의 조정과정과 협력규칙: 서울시와 경기도 상수도 분쟁", 한국정책학회보, 10(1), 141-163.
  18. 현대경제연구원 (2016), "사회적갈등의 경제적 효과 추정과 시사점".
  19. Breen, K. (2009), "Agonism, Antagonism, and the Necessity of Care's", in Schaap, A. ed. Law and Agonistic Politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  20. Deveaux, M. (1999), "Agonism and Pluralism", Philosophy & Social Criticism, 25(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145379902500401
  21. Erman, E. (2009), "What is Wrong with Agonistic Democracy: Reflections on Conflict in Democratic Theory", Philosophy & Social Criticism, 35(9), 1039-1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453709343385
  22. Fossen, T. (2008), "Agonistic Critiques of Liberalism: Perfectionism and Emancipation", Contemporary Political Theory, 7(4), 376-394. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2008.15
  23. Gursozlu, F. (2009), "Debate: Agonism and Deliberation-Recognizing the Difference", The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(3), 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00341.x
  24. Moore, W. H. and D. Siegel (2013), A Mathematics Course for Political and Social Research, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  25. Norval, A. J. (2007), Aversive Democracy: Inheritance and Originality in the Democratic Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Watson, J. (2008), Strategy: An Introduction to Game Theory(2nd ed.), NY: W.W. Norton&Company.