정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제24권1호
  • /
  • Pages.39-48
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PISA 2018년 데이터를 기반으로 한국 학생들의 ICT 접근성과 교과 활용도 분석

An Analysis of ICT Accessibility and Subjects Utilization of Korean Students Based on PISA 2018 Data

  • 김갑수 (서울교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Kim, Kapsu (Seoul National University of Education, Dept. of Computer Education)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.14
  • 심사 : 2020.01.30
  • 발행 : 2020.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 2019년 12월에 발표한 OECD 국가들을 대상으로 한 PISA의 ICT 배경조사 자료를 분석하여 ICT 접근성과 각 교과별 활용도를 분석하는 것이다. 우리나라 학생들의 집에서는 ICT 접근성이 40.40%로 OECD 평균(43.01%)보다 조금 높은 17위이고, 학교에서의 접근성은 40.40%로 OECD 평균( 43.01%)이하인 21위이다. 이것은 3년 전의 최하위 그룹에서 중간 그룹으로 향상되었다. 9개의 교과의 수업시간에 학생들이 디지털 장비를 이용하는 비율은 2.96%로 OECD 평균(8.22%) 보다 매우 아래이고, 국가 순위는 31위이다. 이로써 국가가 인공지능 시대에 필요한 인재를 양성하기 위해서 교육정책의 변화가 필요하다는 것을 알 수 있다.

This study analyzes PISA's ICT background survey on OECD countries published in December 2019 to analyze ICT accessibility and utilization of each subject. In Korea, ICT accessibility at home is 40.40%, ranking 17th, slightly higher than the OECD average (43.01%). Access to schools is 40.40%, ranking 21st below the OECD average(43.01%), which has improved from the lowest group to three in the middle three years ago. In nine subjects, the proportion of students using digital device in the classroom is 2.96%, well below the OECD average(8.22%), and ranked 31st in the OECD country. This shows that the state needs a change in education policy in order to cultivate the talent needed for the AI era.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. CAS (2013A). Computing in the national curriculum: A guide for primary teachers. Computing At School.
  2. CAS (2013B). Computing in the national curriculum: A guide for secondary teachers. Computing At School Computing At School.
  3. CAS(2012). Computer science : A curriculum for schools, Computing At School.
  4. Deborah Seehorn, Stephen Carey, Daniel Moix,Brian Fuschetto, Irene Lee, Dianne O' Grady-Cuniff, Chris Stephenson, Anita Verno (2016). CSTA K-12 COMPUTER SCIENCE STANDARDS REVISED 2016 CSTA STANDARDS TASK FORCE.
  5. Deborah Seehorn, Stephen Carey, Daniel Moix,Brian Fuschetto, Irene Lee, Dianne O'Grady-Cuniff, Chris Stephenson, Anita Verno (2011). CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards Revised 2011.
  6. Kim Kapsu(2017). A Study on ICT Usability and Availability of Between Korean Students and OECD Students, Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(3), 361-371. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.3.361
  7. MOE(2000), Manual of ICT in elementary and secondary schools.
  8. MOE(2005), Manual of ICT in elementary and secondary schools.
  9. MOE(2015), 2015 Revised National Curriculum 2015-74 [10].
  10. OECD(2009). PISA data analysis manual. Paris: OECD.
  11. OECD(2011). PISA 2009 Results: Students On Line Digital Technologies and Performance (Volume IV).
  12. OECD(2013). PISA2012 Results
  13. OECD(2017). PISA2015 Results
  14. OECD(2019). PISA2018 Results
  15. Tucker, A., Deek, F., Jones, J., McCowan, D., Stephenson, C., and Verno, A. (2002). A model curriculum for K-12 computer science, Report of the ACM K-12 Education Task Force Computer Science Curriculum Committee.
  16. WEF(2016)New Vision for Education: Fostering Social and Emotional Learning through Technology,http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_New_Vision_for_Education.pdf
  17. WEF(2019)HR4.0: Shaping People Strategies in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, https://www.weforum.org/reports/hr4-0-shaping-people-strategies-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution