Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Neutral detergent fiber rather than other dietary fiber types as an independent variable increases the accuracy of prediction equation for digestible energy in feeds for growing pigs

  • Choi, Hyunjun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Sung, Jung Yeol (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Beob Gyun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2019.02.04
  • Accepted : 2019.06.13
  • Published : 2020.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The objectives were to investigate correlations between energy digestibility (digestible energy [DE]:gross energy [GE]) and various fiber types including crude fiber (CF), total dietary fiber (TDF), soluble dietary fiber (SDF), insoluble dietary fiber (IDF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF), and to develop prediction equations for estimating DE in feed ingredients and diets for growing pigs. Methods: A total of 289 data with DE values and chemical composition of feeds from 39 studies were used to develop prediction equations for DE. The equations were validated using values provided by the National Research Council. Results: The DE values in feed ingredients ranged from 2,011 to 4,590 kcal/kg dry matter (DM) and those in diets ranged from 2,801 to 4,203 kcal/kg DM. In feed ingredients, DE:GE was negatively correlated (p<0.001) with NDF (r = -0.84), IDF (r = -0.83), TDF (r = -0.82), ADF (r = -0.78), and CF (r = -0.72). A best-fitting model for DE (kcal/kg) in feed ingredients was: 1,356 + (0.704 × GE, kcal/kg) - (60.3 × ash, %) - (27.7 × NDF, %) with R2 = 0.80 and p<0.001. In diets, DE:GE was negatively correlated (p<0.01) with NDF (r = -0.72), IDF (r = -0.61), TDF (r = -0.52), CF (r = -0.45), and ADF (r = -0.34). A best-fitting model for DE (kcal/kg) in diets was: 1,551 + (0.606 × GE, kcal/kg) - (22.1 × ash, %) - (25.6 × NDF, %) with R2 = 0.62 and p<0.001. All variables are expressed as DM basis. The equation developed for DE in feed ingredients had greater accuracy than a published equation for DE. Conclusion: All fiber types are reasonably good independent variables for predicting DE of swine feeds. The best-fitting model for predicting DE of feeds employed neutral detergent fiber as an independent variable.

Keywords

References

  1. Li P, Li DF, Zhang HY, et al. Determination and prediction of energy values in corn distillers dried grains with solubles sources with varying oil content for growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2015;93:3458-70. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8782
  2. Kerr BJ, Dozier III WA, Shurson GC. Effects of reduced-oil corn distillers dried grains with solubles composition on digestible and metabolizable energy value and prediction in growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2013;91:3231-43. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6252
  3. Wang HL, Shi M, Xu X, et al. Determination and prediction of the digestible and metabolisable energy content of barley for growing pigs based on chemical composition. Arch Anim Nutr 2017;71:108-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2017.1279717
  4. Shi M, Liu Z, Wang H, et al. Determination and prediction of the digestible and metabolizable energy contents of corn germ meal in growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2019; 32:405-12. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0891
  5. Just A, Jorgensen H, Fernandez JA. Prediction of metabolizable energy for pigs on the basis of crude nutrients in the feeds. Livest Prod Sci 1984;11:105-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(84)90012-5
  6. Noblet J, Perez JM. Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis. J Anim Sci 1993;71:3389-98. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71123389x
  7. Mertens DR. Challenges in measuring insoluble dietary fiber. J Anim Sci 2003;81:3233-49. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81123233x
  8. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dariy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  9. Prosky L, Asp NG, Schweizer TF, DeVries JW, Furda I. Determination of insoluble, soluble, and total dietary fiber in foods and food products: interlaboratory study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 1988;71:1017-23.
  10. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2012.
  11. Kim BG, Kil DY, Zhang Y, Stein HH. Concentrations of analyzed or reactive lysine, but not crude protein, may predict the concentration of digestible lysine in distillers dried grains with solubles fed to pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;90:3798-808. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4692
  12. Sauvant D, Perez JM, Tran G. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses and fish. 2nd ed. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2004.
  13. Rojas OJ, Vinyeta E, Stein HH. Effects of pelleting, extrusion, or extrusion and pelleting on energy and nutrient digestibility in diets containing different levels of fiber and fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2016;94:1951-60. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0137
  14. Xie F, Pan L, Li ZC, et al. Digestibility of energy in four cereal grains fed to barrows at four body weights. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2017;232:215-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.09.007
  15. Noblet J, Van Milgen J. Energy value of pig feeds: Effect of pig body weight and energy evaluation system. J Anim Sci 2004;82(Suppl 13):E229-38. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8213_supplE229x
  16. Morel PCH, Lee TS, Moughan PJ. Effect of feeding level, live weight and genotype on the apparent faecal digestibility of energy and organic matter in the growing pig. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006;126:63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.06.006
  17. Le Goff G, Van Milgen J, Noblet J. Influence of dietary fibre on digestive utilization and rate of passage in growing pigs, finishing pigs and adult sows. Anim Sci 2002;74:503-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800052668
  18. Urriola PE, Stein HH. Comparative digestibility of energy and nutrients in fibrous feed ingredients fed to Meishan and Yorkshire pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;90:802-12. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3254
  19. Navarro DMDL, Bruininx EMAM, de Jong L, Stein HH. The contribution of digestible and metabolizable energy from high-fiber dietary ingredients is not affected by inclusion rate in mixed diets fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2018;96:1860-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky090
  20. Navarro DMDL, Bruininx EMAM, de Jong L, Stein HH. Analysis for low-molecular-weight carbohydrates is needed to account for all energy-contributing nutrients in some feed ingredients, but physical characteristics do not predict in vitro digestibility of dry matter. J Anim Sci 2018;96:532-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky010
  21. Jorgensen H, Zhao XQ, Eggum BO. The influence of dietary fibre and environmental temoperature on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hind-gut and energy metabolism in pigs. Br J Nutr 1996;75:365-78. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19960140
  22. Abad-Guaman R, Carabano R, Gomez-Conde MS, Garcia J. Effect of type of fiber, site of fermentation, and method of analysis on digestibility of soluble and insoluble fiber in rabbits. J Anim Sci 2015;93:2860-71. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8767
  23. Bindelle J, Buldgen A, Delacollette M, et al. Influence of source and concentrations of dietary fiber on in vivo nitrogen excretion pathways in pigs as reflected by in vitro fermentation and nitrogen incorporation by fecal bacteria. J Anim Sci 2009;87:583-93. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0717
  24. Latymer EA, Low AG, Fadden K, Sambrook IE, Woodley SC, Keal HD. Measurement of transit time of digesta through sections of gastrointestinal tract of pigs fed with diets containing various sources of dietary fibre (non-starch polysaccharides). Arch Tierernahr 1990;40:667-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450399009428415
  25. Navarro DM, Bruininx EM, De Jong L, Stein HH. Effects of physicochemical characteristics of feed ingredients on the apparent total tract digestibility of energy, DM, and nutrients by growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2018;96:2265-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky149
  26. Anderson PV, Kerr BJ, Weber TE, Ziemer CJ, Shurson GC. Determination and prediction of digestible and metabolizable energy from chemical analysis of corn coproducts fed to finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;90:1242-54. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3605

Cited by

  1. Supplemental protease improves in vitro disappearance of dry matter and crude protein in feather meal and copra meal for pigs vol.49, 2020, https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920200095
  2. Oat bran and wheat bran impact net energy by shaping microbial communities and fermentation products in pigs fed diets with or without xylanase vol.11, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00505-7
  3. Effects of body weight and fiber sources on fiber digestibility and short chain fatty acid concentration in growing pigs vol.33, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0713
  4. Prediction equations for digestible and metabolizable energy concentrations in feed ingredients and diets for pigs based on chemical composition vol.34, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0293
  5. Protein and energy concentrations of meat meal and meat and bone meal fed to pigs based on in vitro assays vol.7, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.07.007
  6. Novel Two-Slope Equations to Predict Amino Acid Concentrations Using Crude Protein Concentration in Soybean Meal vol.11, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040280
  7. Equations to Predict Growth Performance Changes by Dietary Deoxynivalenol in Pigs vol.13, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13050360
  8. Evaluation of an equation for predicting metabolisable energy concentration in compound feeds for pigs vol.75, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039x.2021.1947066
  9. Determination, comparison, and prediction of digestible energy, metabolizable energy, and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in novel maize co-products and conventional distillers dried g vol.282, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115149
  10. Determination and prediction of digestible and metabolizable energy of soybean meal and wheat bran for finishing pigs vol.254, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104741