DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Partial replacement of soybean meal by white lupine seeds in the diet of dairy cows

  • Joch, Miroslav (Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Life Sciences) ;
  • Kudrna, Vaclav (Department of Nutrition and Feeding of Farm Animals, Institute of Animal Science)
  • Received : 2019.06.03
  • Accepted : 2019.08.05
  • Published : 2020.06.01

Abstract

Objective: An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of partial replacement of soybean meal (SBM) by white lupine seeds (WLS) on milk yield and quality, feed efficiency and rumen fermentation of high-yielding dairy cows. Methods: Thirty multiparous cows of two breeds (20 Holstein and 10 Czech Pied cows) in early mid-lactation received three diets (treatments) in a 3×3 Latin square design with a 28-d period. The dietary treatments were as follows: CON (control total mixed ration with SBM, no WLS), WLS30 (30% of the SBM was replaced, on a dry matter basis, by WLS), and WLS50 (50% of the SBM was replaced by WLS). Results: Feed intake by the cows was not affected (p = 0.331) by the diets. Milk production decreased with increasing proportions of WLS in the diet. Cows fed WLS50 yielded approximately 1 kg/d (p<0.001) less milk than cows fed the CON diet. The proportions of milk fat (p = 0.640), protein (p = 0.507), and lactose (p = 0.709) were not altered by the diet. For milk fat, feeding with WLS50 reduced the proportion of total saturated fatty acids (p<0.001) and increased the proportion of total monounsaturated fatty acids (p<0.001), mainly through oleic acid (p<0.001). No differences were found in feed efficiency, body weight, and blood plasma metabolites between groups. Rumen ammonia-N levels tended (p = 0.087) to increase with increasing proportions of WLS in the diet, whereas no effect of diet on rumen pH was found (p = 0.558). Conclusion: We did not identify the safe range within which raw WLS can efficiently replace SBM in the diet of high-producing dairy cows. In contrast, even partial replacement of SBM by WLS favorably changed the milk fatty acid profile.

Keywords

References

  1. Lucas MM, Stoddard FL, Annicchiarico P, et al. The future of lupin as a protein crop in Europe. Front Plant Sci 2015;6: 705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00705
  2. Hausling M. The EU protein deficit: What solution for a long-standing problem? (2010/2111 (INI)). Brussels, Belgium: Committee on Agricultural and Rural Development, European Parliament; 2011.
  3. de Visser CLM, Schreuder R, Stoddard F. The EU's dependency on soya bean import for the animal feed industry and potential for EU produced alternatives. OCL 2014;21:D407. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2014021
  4. Lehuger S, Gabrielle B, Gagnaire N. Environmental impact of the substitution of imported soybean meal with locally-produced rapeseed meal in dairy cow feed. J Clean Prod 2009; 17:616-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.005
  5. Singh CK, Robinson PH, McNiven MA. Evaluation of raw and roasted lupin seeds as protein supplements for lactating cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1995;52:63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00707-G
  6. Titze N, Krieg J, Steingass H, Rodehutscord M. Variation of lupin protein degradation in ruminants studied in situ and using chemical protein fractions. Animal 2019;13:709-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002124
  7. van Barneveld RJ. Understanding the nutritional chemistry of lupin (Lupinus spp.) seed to improve livestock production efficiency. Nutr Res Rev 1999;12:203-30. https://doi.org/10.1079/095442299108728938
  8. Lara A, Mendoza GD, Landois L, et al. Milk production in Holstein cows supplemented with different levels of ruminally protected methionine. Livest Sci 2006;105:105-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.04.032
  9. White CL, Young P, Phillips NP, Rodehutscord M. The effect of dietary protein source and protected methionine (Lactet) on wool growth and microbial protein synthesis in Merino wethers. Aust J Agric Res 2000;51:173-84. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR99093
  10. May MG, Otterby DE, Linn JG, Hansen WP, Johnson DG, Putnam DH. Lupins (Lupinus albus) as a protein supplement for lactating Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1993;76:2682-91. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77604-3
  11. Guillaume B, Otterby DE, Linn JG, Stern MD, Johnson DG. Comparison of sweet white lupin seeds with soybean meal as a protein supplement for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1987;70:2339-48. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80294-1
  12. Froidmont E, Bartiaux-Thill N. Suitability of lupin and pea seeds as a substitute for soybean meal in high-producing dairy cow feed. Anim Res 2004;53:475-87. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2004034
  13. Cunniff P. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 16th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC International; 1995.
  14. Horwitz W. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2000.
  15. Horwitz W, Latimer GW. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2005.
  16. Mertens DR. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2002;85:1217-40.
  17. Volek Z, Marounek M, Volkova L, Kudrnova E. Effect of diets containing whole white lupin seeds on rabbit doe milk yield and milk fatty acid composition as well as the growth and health of their litters. J Anim Sci 2014;92:2041-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7120
  18. Cermakova J, Kudrna V, Simeckova M, Vyborna A, Dolezal P, Illek J. Comparison of shortened and conventional dry period management strategies. J Dairy Sci 2014;97:5623-36. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7499
  19. Weatherburn MW. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal Chem 1967;39:971-4. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60252a045
  20. Subcommittee on Dairy Cattle Nutrition, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2001.
  21. White CL, Staines VE, Staines MvH. A review of the nutritional value of lupins for dairy cows. Aust J Agric Res 2007; 58:185-202. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR06109
  22. The French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA). INRA feeding system for ruminants. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2018.
  23. Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Reynolds CK, Kristensen NB, van Vuuren AM. Strategies for optimizing nitrogen use by ruminants. Animal 2010;4:1184-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110000911
  24. Benchaar C, Moncoulon R, Bayourthe C, Vernay M. Effects of a supply of raw or extruded white lupin seeds on protein digestion and amino acid absorption in dairy cows. J Anim Sci 1994;72:492-501. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.722492x
  25. Aufrere J, Garces C, Graviou D, Hernando I, Demarquilly C. Degradation in the rumen of treated and untreated soya bean meal proteins. Ann Zootech 1999;48:263-73. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:19990403
  26. Powell JM, Gourley CJP, Rotz CA, Weaver DM. Nitrogen use efficiency: a potential performance indicator and policy tool for dairy farms. Environ Sci Policy 2010;13:217-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.03.007
  27. Palmquist DL, Denise Beaulieu A, Barbano DM. Feed and animal factors influencing milk fat composition. J Dairy Sci 1993;76:1753-71. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(93)77508-6
  28. Kelsey JA, Corl BA, Collier RJ, Bauman DE. The effect of breed, parity, and stage of lactation on conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in milk fat from dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2003;86:2588-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73854-5
  29. Chilliard Y, Ferlay A. Dietary lipids and forages interactions on cow and goat milk fatty acid composition and sensory properties. Reprod Nutr Dev 2004;44:467-92. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2004052
  30. Mensink RP, Zock PL, Kester ADM, Katan MB. Effects of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates on the ratio of serum total to HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: a meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:1146-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1146
  31. Whitaker D. Metabolic profiles. In: Andrews AH, Blowey RW, Boyd H, Eddy RG, editors. Bovine medicine: diseases and husbandry of cattle. 2nd ed. Ames, IA, USA: Blackwell Publishing; 2004. p. 804-17.
  32. Cozzi G, Ravarotto L, Gottardo F, et al. Short communication: Reference values for blood parameters in Holstein dairy cows: effects of parity, stage of lactation, and season of production. J Dairy Sci 2011;94:3895-901. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3687