DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing Relationships Between Project Characteristic and Public Conflict Characteristic in Public Construction Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP)

Fuzzy AHP를 이용한 프로젝트 특성과 공공갈등 특성 간의 영향 관계 중요도 분석

  • Park, Sungjoon (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Changjun (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Han, Seung Heon (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yun, Sungmin (Department of Civil Engineering, Yeungnam University)
  • 박성준 (연세대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 이창준 (연세대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 한승헌 (연세대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 윤성민 (영남대학교 건설시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2019.09.09
  • Accepted : 2019.12.24
  • Published : 2020.01.31

Abstract

Public conflict in domestic project has been increased and it results in direct and indirect damages. In order to reduce the loss, there have been diverse researches on the public conflict. However, most of researches tend to mainly focus on characteristics of the conflict. Considering the conflict occurred in SOC project, a research of conflict with project characteristics is necessary. In response to consider the relationships between characteristics of project and conflict, this paper aims to present the relative importance of the relationships. We conducted literature reviews and interviews with experts to select main characteristics of projects and public conflicts. Based on the selected four main characteristics each, we analyzed the relationships between them using Fuzzy AHP. The results show that SOC construction project type among project characteristics exerts the most important effect on overall public conflict. Especially conflict factors and conflict phases among public characteristics are critically influenced by project types. The findings provide a foundation for a conflict management reflecting varying public conflicts due to project characteristics.

국내에서 발생하는 공공갈등은 증가 추세이며, 갈등으로 인한 직·간접 피해가 크기 때문에 이를 줄이고자 다양한 연구가 진행되고 있다. 그러나, 기존 연구들은 갈등자체에 보다 중점을 두고 있어 갈등으로 인한 건설사업에 대한 영향에 대한 연구는 미흡한 실정이다. 또한, 대부분의 공공갈등은 대형 SOC 사업과정에서 발생하기에, 프로젝트 특성을 고려한 갈등연구가 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 프로젝트 특성과 공공갈등 특성 간 영향 관계의 중요도를 파악하였다. 문헌고찰과 전문가 자문을 통해 프로젝트와 공공갈등의 대표 특성을 4개씩 선정하였고, 두 집답의 특성 간 영향 관계 중요도를 Fuzzy AHP를 이용하여 분석하였다. 그 결과, 프로젝트 특성 중 SOC 건설사업 유형이 전반적 갈등특성에 가장 큰 영향을 미쳤다. 갈등특성 중 특히 갈등요인과 갈등단계가 건설사업 유형과의 영향 관계 중요도가 높게 나왔다. 본 연구결과를 통해, 프로젝트 특성에 따라 달라지는 갈등의 특성들을 고려한 갈등관리방안 수립할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brahm, E. (2003). Conflict stages. Beyond intractability. "Conflict Research Consortium." University of Colorado, Boulder.
  2. Brockman, J.L. (2013). "Interpersonal conflict in construction: Cost, cause, and consequence." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(2), 04013050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000805
  3. Buckley, J.J. (1985). "Fuzzy hierarchical analysis." Fuzzy sets and systems, 17(3), pp. 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
  4. Castejón-Limas, M., Ordieres-Meré, J., González-Marcos, A., and González-Castro, V. (2011). "Effort estimates through project complexity. Annals of operations research." 186(1), pp. 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0776-0
  5. Chang, D.Y. (1996). "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP." European journal of operational research, 95(3), pp. 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
  6. Cho, K., Hong, T., and Hyun, C. (2009). "Effect of project characteristics on project performance in construction projects based on structural equation model." Expert Systems with Applications, 36(7), pp. 10461-10470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.032
  7. Harker, P.T., and Vargas, L.G. (1987). "The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty̓s analytic hierarchy process." Management science, 33(11), pp. 1383-1403. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383
  8. Hsieh, T.Y., Lu, S.T., and Tzeng, G.H. (2004). "Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings." International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), pp. 573-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.002
  9. Howes, R., and Robinson, H. (2006). "Infrastructure for the built environment: Global procurement strategies." Infrastructure for the Built Environment: Global Procurement Strategies.
  10. Hyundai Research Institute (HRI) (2016). Weekly Economic Review. 16(45).
  11. Institute of Social Conflict (SOCON) (2007). Conflict management and practical manual of SOC projects for each contruction project type, Ministry of Construction & Transportation Research Report.
  12. Jaffar, N., Tharim, A.A., and Shuib, M.N. (2011). "Factors of conflict in construction industry: a literature review." Procedia Engineering, 20, pp. 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.156
  13. Jehn, K.A. (1997). "A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups." Administrative science quarterly, 186(1), pp. 530-557. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393737
  14. Jorgensen, M. (2016). "A survey on the characteristics of projects with success in delivering client benefits." Information and Software Technology, 78, pp. 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.05.008
  15. Kwon, K.D., and Lee K.W. (2017). "Building up DB of public policy conflicts and case studies." Korean Journal of Policy Studies, pp. 77-106.
  16. Kim, Y.M., and Chae, S. (1996). "The application of the analytical Hierarchy process(AHP) to the travel destination choice." The Tourism Science Society of Korea, 20-1(22), pp. 63-81.
  17. Lee, C., Won, J.W., Jang, W., Jung, W., Han, S.H., and Kwak, Y.H. (2017). "Social conflict management framework for project viability: Case studies from Korean megaprojects." International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), pp. 1683-1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.011
  18. Li, T.H., Ng, S.T., and Skitmore, M. (2013). "Evaluating stakeholder satisfaction during public participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: A fuzzy approach." Automation in construction, 29, pp. 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.007
  19. Lim, J.H., Ga, S.J., Kim, K.M., Kim, J.S., and Jeon, H.J. (2016). "A study on stakeholder's behavior and responsibility." Industry-University Cooperation Foundation Dankook University.
  20. Lu, W., Zhang, L., and Pan, J. (2015). "Identification and analyses of hidden transaction costs in project dispute resolutions." International journal of project management. 33(3), pp. 711-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.009
  21. McLeod, L., and MacDonell, S.G. (2011). "Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes: A survey of research." ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 43(4), p. 24.
  22. Min, J.H., Jang, W., Han, S.H., Kim, D., and Young Hoon, K. (2018). "How Conflict Occurs and What Causes Conflict: Conflict Analysis Framework for Public Infrastructure Projects." Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(4), pp. 1-14.
  23. Moore, C.W. (2014). "The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict." John Wiley & Sons.
  24. Saaty, T.L. (1990). "How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process." European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), pp. 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  25. Sharif, M., and Kerachian, R. (2018). "Conflict Resolution in Construction Projects Using Nonzero-Sum Fuzzy Bimatrix Games." Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, pp. 1-9.
  26. Taylan, O., Bafail, A. O., Abdulaal, R.M., and Kabli, M.R. (2014). "Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies." Applied Soft Computing, 17, pp. 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003
  27. Vaux, J.S. (2014). "Relationship conflict in construction management and how it affects performance and profit." Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, 8(33), 44.
  28. Wu, P. (2007). "Application of the Pattern of Construction Management Contract in Large-scale Project in Shanghai." JOURNAL-CHONGQING JIANZHU UNIVERSITY, 29(5), p. 159. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-4764.2007.05.032
  29. Yates, D.J. (1998). "Conflict and disputes in the development process: A transaction cost economics perspective."