한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집 (Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection)

  • 제24권5호
  • /
  • Pages.77-85
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2234-6937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6979(eISSN)
한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 (Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2주탑 콘크리트 사장교의 경계조건별 지진 취약도 분석

Seismic Fragility Analysis by Boundary Conditions of a Two-pylon Concrete Cable-stayed Bridge

  • 투고 : 2020.08.31
  • 심사 : 2020.09.25
  • 발행 : 2020.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 2주탑 콘크리트 사장교를 대상으로 경계조건에 따른 지진 취약도 곡선을 작성하고, 경계조건이 교량의 지진 취약도에 미치는 영향을 평가하고자 한다. 대상교량에 대한 해석모델이 Midas Civil을 사용하여 구축되었고 Fiber요소와 콘크리트, 철근의 재료모델을 적용하여 비선형 시간이력해석을 수행하였다. 주탑과 보강형 사이의 경계조건을 강결, 비구속, 포트받침, 면진받침의 총 4가지로 구분하여 각각의 경계조건에 대해 지진 취약도 곡선을 작성하였다. 주탑의 소성힌지구간과 연결부, 케이블을 취약부재로 선정하고 이 부재들에 대해 지진 취약도 곡선을 작성하였다. 분석결과 주탑의 소성힌지구간과 연결부에서는 면진받침모델이 가장 낮은 손상확률을 나타내고, 케이블의 지진 취약도는 경계조건에 의한 영향이 다른 부재에 비해 크지 않은 것을 알 수 있다.

In this study, the seismic fragility curve according to the boundary conditions is created for a two-pylon concrete cable-stayed bridge, and the effect of the boundary conditions on the seismic fragility of the target bridge is evaluated. An analysis model for the target bridge is constructed using Midas Civil, and a nonlinear time history analysis is performed by applying the fiber element, concrete and rebar material models. The boundary conditions between the pylon and the stiffened girder are classified into four types: rigid, unconstrained, pot bearing, and seismic isolation bearing, and the seismic fragility curves are created for each boundary condition. The plastic hinge section of the pylon, the connection part, and the cable are selected as weak members, and the earthquake vulnerability curve is created for them. As a result of the analysis, it is found that the seismic isolation bearing model shows the lowest damage probability in the pylon and the connection part, and the seismic fragility of the cable is less affected by the boundary conditions than other members.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alberto M. B. Martins, Luis M. C. Simoes, Joao H. J. O. Negrao (2019), Optimization of concrete cable-stayed bridges under siesmic action, Computers and Structures 222, Elsevier B. V., 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.06.008
  2. Avsar, O., Yakut, A., and Caner, A. (2011), Analytical fragility curves for ordinary highway bridges in Turkey. Earthquake Spectra, 27(4), 971-996. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3651349
  3. Baker, J. W. (2015), Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis, Journal of Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 579-599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M
  4. Casciati, F., Cimellaro, G. P., Domaneschi, M. (2008), Seismic reliability of a cable-stayed bridge retrofitted with hysteretic devices, Journal of Computers and Structures, Science Direct, 1769-1781.
  5. Choi, E., DesRoches, R., Nielson, B. (2004), Seismic fragilityof typical bridges in moderate seismic zones, Journal of Engineering Structures, Vol. 26, pp. 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006
  6. Guo, J., Zhong, J., Dang, X., Yuan, W. (2016), Seismic Respnses of a Cable-Stayed Bridge with Consideration of Uniform Temperature Load, Applied Sciences, MDPI, 6, 408, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6120408
  7. HAZUS (1997), Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, Technical Manual, National Institute of Building for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington.
  8. Hwang, H., Liu, J. B., and Chiu, Y. H. (2001), Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges, Report No. MAEC RR-4, Center for Earthquake Research Information, University of Memphis, TN.
  9. Khan, R. A., Datta, T. K., Ahmad, S. (2005), A simplified fragility analysis of fan type cable stayed bridges, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 4, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-005-0027-6
  10. Kim, D. S., Choi, H. S., Park, W. S., Koh, H. M. (2006), Seismic Fragility Analysis of a Cable-stayed Bridge with Energy Dissipation Devices, Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, EESK, 10(3), 1-11.
  11. Li, L., Hu, S., Wang, L. (2017), Seismic fragility assessment of a multi-span cable-stayed bridge with tall piers, Journal of Bull Earthquake Eng, DOI 10.1007/s10518-017-0106.
  12. Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1988), Theoretical Stress‐Strain Model for Confined Concrete, Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8).
  13. Menegotto, M., Pinto, P. E. (1973), Method of Analysis for Cyclic Loaded R. C. Plane Frame Including Changes in Geometry and Non-Elastic Behaviour of Elements under Combined Normal Force and Bending, IABSE Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, Preliminary Report, 11, 15-22.
  14. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2016b), Korean Highway Bridge Design Code(Limit State Design)-Cable Supported Bridge, MOLIT (in Korean).
  15. Niels, J. G., Christos, T. G. (2012), Cable Supported Bridges Concept and Design, John Wiley & Sons, United Kingdom, 109-112.
  16. Ozgur, A., Ahmet Y., Alp, C. (2011), Analytical Fragility Curves for Ordinary Highway Bridges in Turkey, Earthquake Spectra, 27(4), 971-996. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3651349
  17. Pang, Y., Wang, X., Shang, Y., Wu, L. (2014), Seismic Fragility Analysis of Cable-stayed Bridge in China : Comparison of fragility models, Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 19(4),
  18. Shin, Y. W., Hong, K. N., Kwon, Y. M., Yeon, Y. M. (2020), Seismic Fragility Analysis by Key Components of a Two-pylon Concrete Cable-stayed Bridge, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, KSMI, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 26-37. https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2020.24.4.26
  19. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Kim, H. J., and Naganuma, T. (2000), Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126(12), 1224-1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224)
  20. Wu, W., Li, L., and Shao, X. (2016), Seismic Assessment of f Medium-Span Concrete Cable-Stayed Bridges Using the Component and System Fragility Functions, J. Bridge Eng., ASCE, 21(6), 04016027-1-12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000888
  21. Zhong, J., Pang, Y., Jeon, J. S., Reginald, D., Wancheng, Y. (2016), Seismic fragility assessment of long-span cable-stayed bridges in China, Advance in Structural Engineering, SAGE, 19(11), 1797-1812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216649380
  22. Zhong, J., Jeon, J. S., Yuan, W., Roches, R. D., (2017), Impact of Spatial Variability Parameters on Seismic Fragilities of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Subjected to Differential Support Motions, Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 22(6), 04017013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001046