Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제18권1호
  • /
  • Pages.45-56
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Generation of synthetic accelerograms using a probabilistic critical excitation method based on energy constraint

  • Bazrafshan, Arsalan (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University) ;
  • Khaji, Naser (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hiroshima University)
  • 투고 : 2019.01.30
  • 심사 : 2019.11.13
  • 발행 : 2020.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The application of critical excitation method with displacement-based objective function for multi degree of freedom (MDOF) systems is investigated. To this end, a new critical excitation method is developed to find the critical input motion of a MDOF system as a synthetic accelerogram. The upper bound of earthquake input energy per unit mass is considered as a new constraint for the problem, and its advantages are discussed. Considering this constraint, the critical excitation method is then used to generate synthetic accelerograms for MDOF models corresponding to three shear buildings of 10, 16, and 22 stories. In order to demonstrate the reliability of generated accelerograms to estimate dynamic response of the structures, three target ground motions with considerable level of energy contents are selected to represent "real critical excitation" of each model, and the method is used to re-generate these ground motions. Afterwards, linear dynamic analyses are conducted using these accelerograms along with the generated critical excitations, to investigate the key parameters of response including maximum displacement, maximum interstory drift, and maximum absolute acceleration of stories. The results show that the generated critical excitations can make an acceptable estimate of the structural behavior compared to the target ground motions. Therefore, the method can be reliably implemented to generate critical excitation of the structure when real one is not available.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abbas, A.M. and Manohar, C.S. (2007), "Reliability-based vector nonstationary random critical earthquake excitations for parametrically excited systems", Struct. Saf., 29(1), 32-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.11.003.
  2. Ahmadi, G. (1979), "On the application of the critical excitation method to aseismic design", J. Struct. Mech., 7(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601217908905312.
  3. Akehashi, H. and Takewaki, I., (2019), "Optimal viscous damper placement for elastic-plastic MDOF structures under critical double impulse", Front. Built Environ., 5(20). http://hdl.handle.net/2433/237499.
  4. Ashtari, P. and Ghasemi, S.H. (2013), "Seismic design of structures using a modified non-stationary critical excitation", Earthq. Struct., 4(4), 383-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.4.383.
  5. Au, S.K. (2006), "Critical excitation of SDOF elastoplastic systems", J. Sound Vib., 296(4-5), 714-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.034.
  6. Cetin, H., Aydin, E. and Ozturk, B., (2019), "Optimal design and distribution of viscous dampers for shear building structures under seismic excitations", Front. Built Environ., 5, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00090.
  7. Drenick, R.F. (1970), "Model-free design of aseismic structures", J. Eng. Mech., 96(4), 483-493.
  8. Fukumoto, Y. and Takewaki, I. (2015), "Critical earthquake input energy to connected building structures using impulse input", Earthq. Struct., 9(6), 1133-1152. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/241753. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1133
  9. Ghasemi, S.H. and Ashtari, P. (2014), "Combinatorial continuous non-stationary critical excitation in MDOF structures using multi-peak envelope functions", Earthq. Struct., 7(6), 895-908. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.895.
  10. Iyengar, R.N. (1972), "Worst inputs and a bound on the highest peak statistics of a class of non-linear systems", J. Sound Vib., 25(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(72)90593-7
  11. Khatibinia, M., Gholami, H. and Kamgar, R. (2018), "Optimal design of tuned mass dampers subjected to continuous stationary critical excitation", Int. J. Dyn. Cont., 6(3), 1094-1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-017-0386-7.
  12. Kamgar, R., Samea, P. and Khatibinia, M. (2018), "Optimizing parameters of tuned mass damper subjected to critical earthquake", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 27(7), e1460. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1460.
  13. Kamgar, R. and Rahgozar, R. (2015), "Determination of critical excitation in seismic analysis of structures", Earthq. Struct., 9(4), 875-891. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.4.875.
  14. Kamgar, R., Shojaee, S. and Rahgozar, R. (2015), "Rehabilitation of tall buildings by active control system subjected to critical seismic excitation", Asian J. Civ. Eng., 16(6), 819-833.
  15. Kojima, K., Saotome, Y. and Takewaki, I. (2018), "Critical earthquake response of a SDOF elastic-perfectly plastic model with viscous damping under double impulse as a substitute for near-fault ground motion", JPN Arch. Rev., 1(2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/2475-8876.10019.
  16. Lekshmy, P.R. and Raghukanth, S.T.G. (2015), "Maximum possible ground motion for linear structures", J. Earthq. Eng., 19(6), 938-955. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1023472.
  17. Moustafa, A. (2009), "Critical earthquake load inputs for multi-degree-of-freedom inelastic structures", J. Sound Vib., 325(3), 532-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2009.03.022.
  18. Moustafa, A. (2011), "Damage-based design earthquake loads for single-degree-of freedom inelastic structures", J. Struct. Eng., 173(3), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000074.
  19. Nigdeli, S.M. and Bekdas, G. (2017), "Optimum tuned mass damper design in frequency domain for structures", KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 21(3), 912-922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0829-2.
  20. Srinivasan, M., Ellingwood, B. and Corotis, R. (1991), "Critical base excitations of structural systems", J. Eng. Mech., 117(6), 1403-1422. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:6(1403).
  21. Takewaki, I. (2001a), "A new method for non-stationary random critical excitation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30(4), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.21.
  22. Takewaki, I. (2001b), "Nonstationary random critical excitation for acceleration response", J. Eng. Mech., 127(6), 544-556. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:6(544).
  23. Takewaki, I. (2002), "Critical excitation for elastic-plastic structures via statistical equivalent linearization", Prob. Eng. Mech., 17(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00030-3.
  24. Takewaki, I. (2004), "Bound of earthquake input energy", J. Struct. Eng., 130(9), 1289-1297. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1289).
  25. Takewaki, I. (2006), "Probabilistic critical excitation method for earthquake energy input rate", J. Eng. Mech., 132(9), 990-1000. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:9(990).
  26. Tamura, G., Kojima, K. and Takewaki, I., (2019), "Critical response of elastic-plastic SDOF systems with nonlinear viscous damping under simulated earthquake ground motions", Heliyon, 5(2), e01221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01221.
  27. Travasarou, T., Bray, J.D. and Abrahamson, N.A., (2003), "Empirical attenuation relationship for Arias intensity", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(7), 1133-1155. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.270.
  28. Zhai, C.H. and Xie, L.L. (2007), "A new approach of selecting real input ground motions for seismic design: The most unfavourable real seismic design ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(8), 1009-1027. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.669.

피인용 문헌

  1. Optimum location for the belt truss system for minimum roof displacement of steel buildings subjected to critical excitation vol.37, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.37.4.463
  2. SSI effects on the redistribution of seismic forces in one-storey R/C buildings vol.20, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.3.261