Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Novel steel bracket and haunch hybrid system for post-earthquake retrofit of damaged exterior beam-column sub-assemblages

  • Kanchanadevi, A. (CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre) ;
  • Ramanjaneyulu, K. (CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre)
  • Received : 2019.05.16
  • Accepted : 2019.10.05
  • Published : 2020.02.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the present study, an innovative steel bracket and haunch hybrid scheme is devised, for retrofitting of earthquake damaged deficient beam-column sub-assemblages. Formulations are presented for evaluating haunch force factor under combined load case of lateral and gravity loads for the design of double haunch retrofit. The strength hierarchies of control and retrofitted beam-column sub-assemblages are established to showcase the efficacy of the retrofit in reversing the undesirable strength hierarchy. Further, the efficacy of the proposed retrofit scheme is demonstrated through experimental investigations carried out on gravity load designed (GLD), non-ductile and ductile detailed beam-column sub-assemblages which were damaged under reverse cyclic loading. The maximum load carried by repaired and retrofitted GLD specimen in positive and negative cycle is 12% and 28% respectively higher than that of the control GLD specimen. Further, the retrofitted GLD specimen sustained load up to drift ratio of 5.88% compared with 2.94% drift sustained by control GLD specimen. Repaired and retrofitted non-ductile specimen, could attain the displacement ductility of three during positive cycle of loading and showed improved ductility well above the expected displacement ductility of three during negative cycle. The hybrid haunch retrofit restored the load carrying capacity of damaged ductile specimen to the original level of control specimen and improved the ductility closer to the expected displacement ductility of five. The total cumulative energy dissipated by repaired and retrofitted GLD, non-ductile and ductile specimens are respectively 6.5 times, 2.31 times, 1.21 times that of the corresponding undamaged control specimens. Further, the damage indices of the repaired and retrofitted specimens are found to be lower than that of the corresponding control specimens. The novel and innovative steel bracket and haunch hybrid retrofit scheme proposed in the present study demonstrated its effectiveness by attaining the required displacement ductility and load carrying capacity and would be an excellent candidate for post-earthquake retrofit of damaged existing RC structures designed according to different design evolutions.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI 318M (2011), "Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary," Farmington Hills, MI, U.S.A.
  2. Adibi, M., Marefata, M.S., Arani, K.K. and Zare, H. (2017), "External retrofit of beam-column joints in old fashioned RC structures", Earthq. Struct., 12(2), 237-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.2.237
  3. Antonopoulos, C.P. and Triantafillou, T.C. (2003), "Experimental investigation of FRP-strengthened RC beam-column Joints", J. Compos. Construct., 7(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2003)7:1(39)
  4. Balsamo, A., Colombo, A., Manfredi, G., Negro, P. and Prota A. (2005), "Seismic behaviour of a full-scale RC frame repaired using CFRP laminates", Eng. Struct., 27, 769-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.01.002
  5. Bracci, J.M., Reinhorn, A.M. and Mander, J.B. (1995), "Seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings designed for gravity loads: performance of structural model", ACI Struct. J., 92(6),711-723. https://doi.org/10.14359/9665
  6. Campione, G., Cavaleri, L. and Papia, M. (2015), "Flexural response of external R.C. beam-column joints externally strengthened with steel cages", Eng. Struct., 104, 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.009
  7. Chaimahawan, P. and Pimanmas, A. (2009), "Seismic retrofit of substandard beam-column joint by planar joint expansion", Mater. Struct., 42, 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9393-7
  8. Corte, G.D., Barecchia, E. and Mazzolani, F.M. (2006), "Seismic upgrading of RC buildings by FRP: Full-scale tests of a real Structure", J. Mater. Civil Eng., 18(5), 659-669. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)08991561(2006)18:5(659)
  9. Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G. and Ramasco, R. (1993), "The use of damage functionals in earthquake engineering: a comparison between different methods", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 22(10), pp.855-868. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290221003.
  10. Duran, B., Tunaboyu, O., Atli, K.C. and Avsar, O. (2019), "Seismic performance upgrading of substandard RC frames using shape memory alloy bars", Smart Mater. Struct., 28, 085007 (21pp). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab28f6
  11. EC8 (2004), Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium.
  12. Elmenshawi, A., Brown, T. and El-Metwally, S. (2012), "Plastic hinge length considering shear reversal in reinforced concrete elements", J. Earthq. Eng., 16(2), pp.188-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.597485
  13. Garcia, R., Jemaa, Y., Helal, Y., Guadagnini, M. and Pilakoutas, K. (2014a), "Seismic strengthening of severely damaged beam-column RC joints using CFRP", J. Compos. Construct., 18(2), 04013048-1-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000448
  14. Garcia, R., Hajirasouliha, I., Guadagnini, M., Helal, Y., Jemaa, Y., Pilakoutas, K., et al, (2014b), "Full-Scale Shaking Table Tests on a Substandard RC Building Repaired and Strengthened with Post-Tensioned Metal Strap", J. Earthq. Eng., 18,187-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.847874
  15. Genesio, G. (2012), "Seismic Assessment of RC Exterior Beam-Column Joints and Retrofit with Haunches Using Post-Installed Anchors", Ph.D Dissertation; University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  16. Hwang, S.J. and Lee, H. J. (1999), "Analytical model for predicting shear strengths of exterior reinforced concrete beam-column joints for seismic resistance", ACI Struct. J., 96(5), 846-858. https://doi.org/10.14359/739
  17. IS1893(2002), Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Part 1: General provisions and buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards; New Delhi, India
  18. IS456(2000), Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete (Fourth revision), Bureau of Indian Standards; New Delhi, India.
  19. IS13920(1993), Ductility detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces; Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  20. Kakaletsis, D.J., David, K.N. and Karayannis, C.G. (2011) "Effectiveness of some conventional seismic retrofitting techniques for bare and infilled R/C frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., 39(4),499-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.39.4.499.
  21. Kalogeropoulos, G.I, Tsonos, A.G., Konstandinidis, D., and Tsetines, S. (2016), "Pre-earthquake and post-earthquake retrofitting of poorly detailed exterior RC beam-to-column joints", Eng. Struct., 109, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.009.
  22. Kanchanadevi, A., Ramanjaneyulu, K., Mayank, T. and Saptarshi S. (2018), "Novel non-invasive seismic upgradation strategies for gravity load designed exterior beam-column joints", Arch. Civil Mech. Eng., 18, 479- 489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.08.005.
  23. Kanchanadevi, A. and Ramanjaneyulu, K. (2018), "Non-invasive steel haunch upgradation strategy for seismically deficient reinforced concrete exterior beam-column sub-assemblages", Steel Compos. Struct., 28(6),719-734. http://dx.doi. org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.6.719
  24. Kanchanadevi, A. and Ramanjaneyulu, K. (2019), "Non-invasive hybrid retrofit for seismic damage mitigation of gravity load designed exterior beam-column sub-assemblage", J. Earthq. Eng., DOI:10.1080/13632469.2019.1592790.
  25. Karayannis, C.G. and Sirkelis, G.M. (2008), "Strengthening and rehabilitation of RC beam-column joints using carbon-FRP jacketing and epoxy resin injection", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 37,769-790. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.785
  26. Karayannis, C.G. and Golias, E. (2018), "Full scale tests of RC joints with minor to moderate seismic damage repaired using C-FRP sheets", Earthq. Struct., 15(6), pp.617-627. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.6.617
  27. Kheyroddin, A., Khalili, A., Emami, E. and Sharbatdar, M.K. (2016), "An innovative experimental method to upgrade performance of external weak RC joints using fused steel prop plus sheets", Steel Compos. Struct., 21(2), 443-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.21.2.443
  28. Li, Y. and Sanada, Y. (2017), "Seismic strengthening of existing RC beam-column joints by wing walls", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 46, 1987-2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2890
  29. Mahrenholtz, C., Lin, P.C., Wu, A.C., Tsai, K.C., Hwang, S.J., Lin, R.Y. et al. (2015), "Retrofit of reinforced concrete frames with buckling-restrained braces", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 44, 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2458
  30. Misir, I.S. and Kahraman, S. (2013), "Strengthening of non-seismically detailed reinforced concrete beam-column joints using SIFCON blocks", Sadhana, 38 (1), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-013-0127-3
  31. Mukherjee, A. and Joshi, M. (2005), "FRPC reinforced concrete beam-column joints under cyclic excitation", Composite Structures, 70, 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct. 2004.08.022
  32. NZS 3101(2006), "Concrete Structures Standard Part 1 -The Design of Concrete Structures", Standards New Zealand, Wellington.
  33. Pampanin, S., Christopoulos, C. and Chen, T.H. (2006), "Development and validation of a metallic haunch seismic retrofit solution for existing under-designed RC frame buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 35, 1739-1766. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.600
  34. Park, Y. and Ang, A. (1985), "Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced-concrete", J. Struct. Eng. ASCE, 111(4), 722-739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
  35. Park, Y.J., Ang, A.H.S. and Wen, Y. K. (1987), "Damage-limiting aseismic design of buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 3(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585416
  36. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.N., 1992. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings.
  37. Prota, A., Nanni, A., Manfredi, G. and Cosenza, E. (2003), "Capacity assessment of RC sub-assemblages upgraded with CFRP", J. Reinforced Plastics Compos., 22(14), 1287-1304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684403035580
  38. Shafaei, J., Hosseini, A., Marefat, M.S. and Ingham, J.M. (2017), "Rehabilitation of earthquake damaged external RC beam-column joints by joint enlargement using prestressed steel angles", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 46, 291-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2794
  39. Shannag, M.J., Barakat, S. and Abdul-Kareem M. (2002), "Cyclic behavior of HPFRC-repaired reinforced concrete interior beam-column joints", Mater. Struct., 35, 348-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02483154
  40. Shannag, M.J. and Alhassan, M.A. (2005), "Seismic upgrade of interior beam-column sub-assemblages with high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete jackets", ACI Struct. J., 102(1),131-138. https://doi.org/10.14359/13538
  41. Sharma, A., Reddy, G.R., Eligehausen, R., Genesio, G. and Pampanin, S. (2014), "Seismic response of reinforced concrete frames with haunch retrofit solution", ACI Struct. J., 111(3), 673-684. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686625
  42. Stoppenhagen, D.R., Jirsa, J.O. and Wyllie, L.A. (1995), "Seismic repair and strengthening of a severely damaged concrete frame", ACI Struct. J., 92(2),177-187. https://doi.org/10.14359/1157
  43. Torabi, A. and Maheri, M.R. (2017), "Seismic repair and retrofit of RC beam-column joints using stiffened steel plates", Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Transactions Civil. Eng., 41(1),13-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-016-0027-y
  44. Tsonos, A.G. (2008), "Effectiveness of CFRP-jackets and RC-jackets in post-earthquake and pre-earthquake retrofitting of beam-column sub-assemblages", Eng. Struct., 30, 777-793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.008
  45. Tsonos, A.G. (2014), "A new method for earthquake strengthening of old R/C structures without the use of conventional reinforcement", Struct. Eng. Mech., 52(2), 391-403. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.52.2.391
  46. Wang, B., Zhu, S., Xu, Y.L. and Jiang, H. (2018), "Seismic Retrofitting of Non-Seismically Designed RC Beam-Column Joints using Buckling Restrained Haunches: Design and Analysis", J. Earthq. Eng., 22(7), 1188-1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1277441
  47. Yang, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Wang, N. and Yud, Y. (2018), "Experimental study on seismic behavior of RC beam-column joints retrofitted using prestressed steel strips", Earthq. Struct., 15(5), 499-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.5.499
  48. Yu, Q.S., Uang, C.M. and Gross, J. (2000), "Seismic rehabilitation design of steel moment connection with welded haunch", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 126(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(69)
  49. Yurdakul, O. and Avsar, O. (2015), "Structural repairing of damaged reinforced concrete beam-column assemblies with CFRPs", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(3), 521-543. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.3.521
  50. Yurdakul, O. and Avsar, O. (2016), "Strengthening of substandard reinforced concrete beam-column joints by external post-tension rods", Eng. Struct., 107, 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.004
  51. Yurdakul, O., Tunaboyu, O. and Avsar, O. (2018), "Retrofit of non-seismically designed beam-column joints by post-tensioned superelastic shape memory alloy bars", Bulletin Earthq. Eng., 16(11), pp.5279-5307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0323-y.
  52. Zabihi, A., Tsang, H.H., Gad, E.F. and Wilson, J.L. (2018), "Seismic retrofit of exterior RC beam-column joint using diagonal haunch", Eng. Struct., 174, 753-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.100