Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제73권1호
  • /
  • Pages.53-64
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Case study on seismic retrofit and cost assessment for a school building

  • Miano, Andrea (Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Naples Federico II) ;
  • Chiumiento, Giovanni (Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Naples Federico II)
  • 투고 : 2018.07.25
  • 심사 : 2019.08.27
  • 발행 : 2020.01.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In different high seismic regions around the world, many non-ductile existing reinforced concrete frame buildings, built without adequate seismic detailing requirements, have been damaged or collapsed after past earthquakes. The assessment and the retrofit of these non-ductile concrete structures is crucial theme of research for all the scientific community of engineers. In particular, a careful assessment of the existing building is fundamental for understanding the failure mechanisms that govern the collapse of the structure or the achievement of the recommended limit states. Based on the seismic assessment, the best retrofit strategy can be designed and applied to the structure. A school building located in Avellino province (Italy) is the case study. The analysis of seismic vulnerability carried out on the mentioned building has highlighted deficiencies in both static and seismic load conditions. The retrofit of the building has been designed based on different retrofit options in order to show the real retrofit design developed from the engineers to achieve the seismic safety of the building. The retrofit costs associated to structural operations are calculated for each case and have been summed up to the costs of the in situ tests. The paper shows a real retrofit design case study in which the best solution is chosen based on the results in terms of structural performance and cost among the different retrofit options.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aslani, H. (2005), "Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings", Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, United Kingdom.
  2. Aversa, S., Da Porto, F., Di Pasquale, G., Dolce, M., Foti, S., Griffini, L., Lanzo, G., Manfredi, G., Modena, C., Monaco, P., Montella, G., Moroni, C., Naso, G., Pingitore, D., Prota, A., Ricci, D., Silvestri, Simonelli A., Totani, G. and Venturi V. (2012), Linee guida per modalita di indagine sulle strutture e sui terreni per i progetti di riparazione, miglioramento e ricostruzione di edifici inagibili, Doppiavoce, Naples, Italy.
  3. Bungey, J. H. and Grantham, M. G. (2014), Testing of Concrete in Structures, CRC Press, London, United Kingdom.
  4. Cabral-Fonseca, S., Correia, J.R., Custodio, J., Silva, H.M., Machado, A.M., and Sousa, J. (2018). "Durability of FRP-concrete bonded joints in structural rehabilitation: A review", Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives, 83, 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.014.
  5. Calvi, G.M. (2013), "Choices and criteria for seismic strengthening", J. Earthq. Eng., 17(6), 769-802. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.781556.
  6. Commentary (2009), "Istruzioni per l'applicazione delle 'Norme Tecniche delle Costruzioni' di cui al D.M. 14 gennaio 2008", Ordinary supplement to the Official Gazzette, n. 27 of 9 February 2009, Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport.
  7. CDS (2018), CDS Win, Computer Design of Structures, Scientific and technical Software, Sant'Agata Li Battiati, Catania, Italy
  8. Di Ludovico, M., Prota, A., Manfredi, G. and Cosenza, E. (2008), "Seismic strengthening of an under-designed RC structure with FRP", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37, 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.749.
  9. Eurocode 8 (2005), Part 3 EN1998-3, Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, CEN; Brussels, Belgium.
  10. Fajfar, P. (1999), "Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28(9), 979-994. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9%3C979::AID-EQE850%3E3.0.CO;2-1.
  11. Fajfar, P. (2000), "A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design", Earthq. Spectra, 16(3), 573-592. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128.
  12. Formisano, A., Castaldo, C. and Chiumiento, G. (2017), "Optimal seismic upgrading of a reinforced concrete school building with metal-based devices using an efficient multi-criteria decision-making method", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 13(11), 1373-1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1268174.
  13. Frascadore, R., Di Ludovico, M., Prota, A., Verderame, G.M., Manfredi, G., Dolce, M. and Cosenza, E. (2015), "Local strengthening of reinforced concrete structures as a strategy for seismic risk mitigation at regional scale", Earthq. Spectra, 31(2), 1083-1102. https://doi.org/10.1193/122912EQS361M.
  14. Goulet, C.A., Haselton, C.B., Mitrani-Reiser, J., Beck, J.L., Deierlein, G.G., Porter, K.A. and Stewart, J.P. (2007), "Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building-from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13), 1973-1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.694.
  15. Guneyisi, E.M., and Azez, I. (2016), "Seismic upgrading of structures with different retrofitting methods", Earthq. Struct., 10(3), 589-611. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.3.589.
  16. Jalayer, F., Elefante, L., Iervolino, I., and Manfredi, G. (2011), "Knowledge-based performance assessment of existing RC buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 15(3), 362-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2010.501193
  17. Jalayer, F., De Risi, R. and Manfredi, G. (2015), "Bayesian cloud analysis: Efficient structural fragility assessment using linear regression", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(4), 1183-1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9692-z.
  18. Jalayer, F., and Ebrahimian, H. (2017), "Seismic risk assessment considering cumulative damage due to aftershocks", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 46(3), 369-389. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2792.
  19. Jalayer, F., Ebrahimian, H., Miano, A., Manfredi, G. and Sezen H. (2017), "Analytical fragility assessment using un-scaled ground motion records", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 46(15), 2639-2663. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2922.
  20. Liel, A.B. and Deierlein, G.G. (2013), "Cost-benefit evaluation of seismic risk mitigation alternatives for older concrete frame buildings," Earthq. Spectra, 29(4), 1391-1411. https://doi.org/10.1193/030911EQS040M.
  21. Miano, A., Jalayer, F. and Prota, A. (2017), "Considering Structural Modeling Uncertainties using Bayesian Cloud Analysis", Proceedings of 6th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN), Rhodes, Greece, June.
  22. Miano, A., Sezen, H., Jalayer, F. and Prota, A. (2018a), "Performance based assessment and retrofit of non ductile existing reinforced concrete structures", Proceedings of the Structures Conference 2018, Fort Worth, Texas, April.
  23. Miano, A., Jalayer, F., Ebrahimian, H. and Prota, A. (2018b), "Cloud to IDA: Efficient fragility assessment with limited scaling," Earth. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 47(5), 1124-1147. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3009.
  24. Miano, A., Sezen, H., Jalayer, F. and Prota, A. (2019a), "Performance based assessment methodology for retrofit of buildings", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 145(12), 04019144. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002419.
  25. Miano, A., Jalayer, F., Ebrahimian, H. and Prota, A. (2019b), "Nonlinear dynamic analysis procedure with limited number of analyses and scaling", Proceedings of of 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN), Crete, Greece, June.
  26. Moehle, J.P. (2000), "State of research on seismic retrofit of concrete building structures in the US", US-Japan Symposium and Workshop on Seismic Retrofit of Concrete Structures, Tokyo, Japan, June.
  27. NTC (2008), "Norme tecniche per le Costruzioni", Decree of Infrastructures and Transport Ministery, January 14, 2008 (Official Gazette no. 29 of February 4, 2008 - Suppl. Ord.)
  28. NTC (2018), "Norme tecniche per le Costruzioni", Decree of Infrastructures and Transport Ministery, January 17, 2018 (Official Gazette no. 42 of February 20, 2018 - Suppl. Ord.)
  29. Proenca, J.M. and Gago, A.S. (2011), Seismic Strengthening of School Buildings, Parque Escolar, Lisbon, Portugal.
  30. Regional price list for Campania, Italy (2018), "Prezzario regionale dei Lavori Pubblici anno 2018", Legislative Decree 18 April 2016, n. 50 - L.R. February 27, 2007, n. 3
  31. RILEM (1993), "Draft recommendations for in situ concrete strength determination by combined non-destructive methods", Compendium of RILEM, Technical Recommendations, E&FN Spon, London, United Kingdom.
  32. Saribiyik, A. and Caglar, N. (2016), "Flexural strengthening of RC beams with low-strength concrete using GFRP and CFRP", Struct. Eng. Mech., 58(5), 825-845. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.58.5.825
  33. Thermou, G.E. and Elnashai, A.S. (2006), "Seismic retrofit schemes for RC structures and local-global consequences", Prog. Struct. Eng. Mat., 8(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.208.
  34. Valarinho, L., Correia, J.R. and Branco, F.A. (2013), "Experimental study on the flexural behaviour of multi-span transparent glass-GFRP composite beams", Constr. Build. Mat., 49, 1041-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.024
  35. Verderame, G.M., Stella, A. and Cosenza, E. (2001), "Le proprieta meccaniche degli acciai impiegati nelle strutture in ca realizzate negli anni'60", X Convegno nazionale "L'Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Potenza-Matera, Italy, September.
  36. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1994), "Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23, 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230504.