Smart Structures and Systems

  • 제25권2호
  • /
  • Pages.241-254
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1738-1584(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1738-1991(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic vibration control of an innovative self-centering damper using confined SMA core

  • Qiu, Canxing (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology) ;
  • Gong, Zhaohui (School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University) ;
  • Peng, Changle (School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University) ;
  • Li, Han (School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University)
  • 투고 : 2019.04.01
  • 심사 : 2019.08.15
  • 발행 : 2020.02.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Using confined shape memory alloy (SMA) bar or plate, this study proposes an innovative self-centering damper. The damper is essentially properly machined SMA core, i.e., bar or plate, that encased in buckling-restrained device. To prove the design concept, cyclic loading tests were carried out. According to the test results, the damper exhibited desired flag-shape hysteretic behaviors upon both tension and compression actions, although asymmetric behavior is noted. Based on the experimental data, the hysteretic parameters that interested by seismic applications, such as the strength, stiffness, equivalent damping ratio and recentering capacity, are quantified. Processed in the Matlab/Simulink environment, a preliminary evaluation of the seismic control effect for this damper was conducted. The proposed damper was placed at the first story of a multi-story frame and then the original and controlled structures were subjected to earthquake excitations. The numerical outcome indicated the damper is effective in controlling seismic deformation demands. Besides, a companion SMA damper which represents a popular type in previous studies is also introduced in the analysis to further reveal the seismic control characteristics of the newly proposed damper. In current case, it was found that although the current SMA damper shows asymmetric tension-compression behavior, it successfully contributes comparable seismic control effect as those having symmetrical cyclic behavior. Additionally, the proposed damper even shows better global performance in controlling acceleration demands. Thus, this paper reduces the concern of using SMA dampers with asymmetric cyclic behavior to a certain degree.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing Postdoctoral Research Foundation

참고문헌

  1. Araki, Y., Maekawa, N., Shrestha, K.C., Yamakawa, M., Koetaka, Y., Omori, T. and Kainuma, R. (2014), "Feasibility of tension braces using Cu-Al-Mn superelastic alloy bars", Struct. Control Health Monitor., 21(10), 1304-1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1644
  2. Bartera, F. and Giacchetti, R. (2004), "Steel dissipating braces for upgrading existing building frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 60(3-5), 751-769. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0143-974x(03)00141-x
  3. Bhaskararao, A.V. and Jangid, R.S. (2006), "Seismic analysis of structures connected with friction dampers", Eng. Struct., 28(5), 690-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.020
  4. Black, C.J., Makris, N. and Aiken, I.D. (2004), "Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of bucklingrestrained braces", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 130(6), 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:6(880)
  5. Carreras, G., Casciati, F., Casciati, S., Isalgue, A., Marzi, A. and Torra, V. (2011), "Fatigue laboratory tests toward the design of SMA portico-braces", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J., 7(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2011.7.1.041
  6. Casciati, S. and Marzi, A. (2010), "Experimental studies on the fatigue life of shape memory alloy bars", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J., 6(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2010.6.1.073
  7. Casciati, S. and Marzi, A. (2011), "Fatigue tests on SMA bars in span control", Eng. Struct., 33(4), 1232-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.045
  8. Casciati, S., Faravelli, L. and Vece, M. (2017), "Investigation on the fatigue performance of Ni-Ti thin wires", Struct. Control Health Monitor., 24(1), e1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1855
  9. Chinese Standard (2003), Code for design of steel structure GB50017, Ministry of Construction of China; Beijing, China.
  10. Colajanni, P. and Papia, M. (1995), "Seismic response of braced frames with and without friction dampers", Eng. Struct., 17(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)92644-n
  11. Cruz Noguez, C.A. and Saiidi, M.S. (2012), "Performance of advanced materials during earthquake loading tests of a bridge system", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 139(1), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000611
  12. DesRoches, R. and Smith, B. (2004), "Shape memory alloys in seismic resistant design and retrofit: a critical review of their potential and limitations", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(3), 415-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350495
  13. DesRoches, R., McCormick, J. and Delemont, M. (2004), "Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 130(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38)
  14. Dolce, M., Cardone, D. and Marnetto, R. (2000), "Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29(7), 945-968. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200007)29:7<945::aideqe958>3.3.co;2-r.
  15. Fahnestock, L.A., Sause, R. and Ricles, J.M. (2007), "Seismic response and performance of buckling-restrained braced frames", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 133(9), 1195-1204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2007)133:9(1195)
  16. Fang, C., Wang, W., He, C. and Chen, Y. (2017), "Self-centring behaviour of steel and steel-concrete composite connections equipped with NiTi SMA bolts", Eng. Struct., 150, 390-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.067
  17. Gall, K. and Sehitoglu, H. (1999), "The role of texture in tension-compression asymmetry in polycrystalline NiTi", Int. J. Plastic., 15(1), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-6419(99)00020-0
  18. Graesser, E.J. and Cozzarelli, F.A. (1991), "Shape-memory alloys as new materials for aseismic isolation", ASCE J. Eng. Mech., 117(11), 2590-2608. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1991)117:11(2590)
  19. Hou, H., Li, H., Qiu, C. and Zhang, Y. (2018), "Effect of hysteretic properties of SMAs on seismic behavior of self-centering concentrically braced frames", Struct. Control Health Monitor., 25(3), e2110. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2110
  20. Katariya, P.V., Panda, S.K., Hirwani, C.K., Mehar, K. and Thakare, O. (2017), "Enhancement of thermal buckling strength of laminated sandwich composite panel structure embedded with shape memory alloy fibre", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J., 20(5), 595-605. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.20.5.595
  21. Li, H., Mao, C.X. and Ou, J.P. (2008), "Experimental and theoretical study on two types of shape memory alloy devices", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(3), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.761
  22. Li, H.N., Huang, Z., Fu, X. and Li, G. (2018), "A re-centering deformation-amplified shape memory alloy damper for mitigating seismic response of building structures", Struct. Control Health Monitor., 25(9), e2233. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2233
  23. Liu, Y., Xie, Z., Van Humbeeck, J. and Delaey, L. (1998), "A symmetry of stress-strain curves under tension and compression for NiTi shape memory alloys", Acta Materialia, 46(12), 4325-4338. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6454(98)00112-8
  24. Liu, J.L., Zhu, S., Xu, Y.L. and Zhang, Y.F. (2011), "Displacement-based design approach for highway bridges with SMA isolators", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J., 8(2), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2011.8.2.173
  25. Ma, H. and Yam, M.C. (2011), "Modelling of a self-centring damper and its application in structural control", J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(4), 656-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.11.014
  26. Min, K.W., Kim, J. and Lee, S.H. (2004), "Vibration tests of 5-storey steel frame with viscoelastic dampers", Eng. Struct., 26(6), 831-839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.02.004
  27. Mualla, I.H. and Belev, B. (2002), "Performance of steel frames with a new friction damper device under earthquake excitation", Eng. Struct., 24(3), 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(01)00102-x
  28. Qiu, C. and Zhao, X. (2018), "Temperature effect on seismic performance of CBFs equipped with SMA braces", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J., 22(5), 495-508. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.22.5.495
  29. Qiu, C. and Zhu, S. (2014), "Characterization of cyclic properties of superelastic monocrystalline Cu-Al-Be SMA wires for seismic applications", Constr. Build. Mater., 72, 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.065
  30. Qiu, C. and Zhu, S. (2016), "High-mode effects on seismic performance of multi-story self-centering braced steel frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 119, 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.12.008
  31. Qiu, C. and Zhu, S. (2017a), "Performance-based seismic design of self-centering steel frames with SMA-based braces", Eng. Struct., 130, 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.051
  32. Qiu, C. and Zhu, S. (2017b), "Shake table test and numerical study of self-centering steel frame with SMA braces", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 46(1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2777
  33. Qiu, C., Zhang, Y., Qi, J. and Li, H. (2018), "Seismic behavior of properly designed CBFs equipped with NiTi SMA braces", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J, 21(4), 479-491. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.21.4.479
  34. Roh, H. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2010), "Hysteretic behavior of precast segmental bridge piers with superelastic shape memory alloy bars", Eng. Struct., 32(10), 3394-3403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.013
  35. Sabelli, R., Mahin, S. and Chang, C. (2003), "Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 25(5), 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(02)00175-x
  36. Samali, B. and Kwok, K.C.S. (1995), "Use of viscoelastic dampers in reducing wind-and earthquake-induced motion of building structures", Eng. Struct., 17(9), 639-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)00034-5
  37. Shrestha, K.C., Araki, Y., Nagae, T., Omori, T., Sutou, Y., Kainuma, R. and Ishida, K. (2013), "Effectiveness of superelastic bars for seismic rehabilitation of clay-unit masonry walls", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(5), 725-741. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2241
  38. Sommerville, P., Smith, N., Punyamurthula, S. and Sun, J. (1997), "Development of ground motion time histories for Phase 2 of the FEAM/SAC steel project SAC Background document SAC", BD-91/04, SAC joint venture, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  39. Song, G., Ma, N. and Li, H.N. (2006), "Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures", Eng. Struct., 28(9), 1266-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.010
  40. Soong, T.T. and Dargush, G.F. (1997), Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering, Wiley, New York.
  41. Tian, L. and Qiu, C. (2018), "Controlling Residual Drift in BRBFs by Combining SCCBFs in Parallel", ASCE J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 32(4), 04018047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001191.
  42. Torra, V., Carreras, G., Casciati, S. and Terriault, P. (2014), "On the NiTi wires in dampers for stayed cables", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J., 13(13), 1738-1584. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.3.353
  43. Tremblay, R., Lacerte, M. and Christopoulos, C. (2008), "Seismic response of multistory buildings with self-centering energy dissipative steel braces", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 134(1), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2008)134:1(108)
  44. Tsai, K.C., Chen, H.W., Hong, C.P. and Su, Y.F. (1993), "Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction", Earthq. Spectra, 9(3), 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585727
  45. Wang, B. and Zhu, S. (2018), "Cyclic tension-compression behavior of superelastic shape memory alloy bars with bucklingrestrained devices", Constr. Build. Mater., 186, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.047
  46. Wang, W., Fang, C. and Liu, J. (2016), "Large size superelastic SMA bars: heat treatment strategy, mechanical property and seismic application", Smart Mater. Struct., 25(7), 075001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/7/075001
  47. Wang, B., Zhu, S., Qiu, C. and Jin, H. (2019), "High-performance self-centering steel columns with shape memory alloy bolts: Design procedure and experimental evaluation", Eng. Struct., 182, 446-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.077
  48. Whittaker, A.S., Bertero, V.V., Thompson, C.L. and Alonso, L.J. (1991), "Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices", Earthq. Spectra, 7(4), 563-604. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585644
  49. Wilde, K., Gardoni, P. and Fujino, Y. (2000), "Base isolation system with shape memory alloy device for elevated highway bridges", Eng. Struct., 22(3), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(98)00097-2
  50. Xu, X., Tu, J., Cheng, G., Zheng, J. and Luo, Y. (2019), "Experimental study on self-centering link beams using posttensioned steel-SMA composite tendons", J. Constr. Steel Res., 155, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.12.026
  51. Youssef, M.A., Alam, M.S. and Nehdi, M. (2008), "Experimental investigation on the seismic behavior of beam-column joints reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloys", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(7), 1205-1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802003082
  52. Zhang, Y. and Zhu, S. (2007), "Shape memory alloy-based reusable hysteretic damper for seismic hazard mitigation", Smart Mater. Struct., 16, 1603-1613. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/16/5/014
  53. Zhang, Y. and Zhu, S. (2008), "Seismic response control of building structures with superelastic shape memory alloy wire dampers", ASCE J. Eng. Mech., 134(3), 240-251. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2008)134:3(240)
  54. Zhu, S. and Zhang, Y. (2007), "Seismic behaviour of self-centring braced frame buildings with reusable hysteretic damping brace", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(10), 1329-1346. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.683