Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제73권6호
  • /
  • Pages.651-666
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Practical coherency model suitable for near- and far-field earthquakes based on the effect of source-to-site distance on spatial variations in ground motions

  • Yu, Rui-Fang (Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration) ;
  • Abduwaris, Abduwahit (Earthquake Administration of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region) ;
  • Yu, Yan-Xiang (Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration)
  • 투고 : 2019.04.02
  • 심사 : 2019.11.12
  • 발행 : 2020.03.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, the spatial variation mechanisms of large far-field earthquakes at engineering scales are first investigated with data from the 2008 Ms 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake. And a novel 'coherency cut-off frequency' is proposed to distinguish the spatial variations in ground motions in the low-frequency and high-frequency ranges. Then, a practical piecewise coherency model is developed to estimate and characterize the spatial variation in earthquake ground motions, including the effects of source-to-site distances, site conditions and neighboring topography on these variations. Four particular earthquake records from dense seismograph arrays are used to investigate values of the coherency cut-off frequency for different source-to-site distances. On the basis of this analysis, the model is established to simulate the spatial variations, whose parameters are suitable for both near- and far-field earthquake conditions. Simulations are conducted to validate the proposed model and method. The results show that compared to the existing models, the proposed model provides an effective method for simulating the spatial correlations of ground motions at local sites with known source-to-site distances.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Natural Science Foundation of China

The financial supports from Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51878627 and No. 51478440) are much appreciated.

참고문헌

  1. Abrahamson, N.A., Schneider, J.F. and Step, J.C. (1991), "Spatial coherency of shear waves from the Lotung, Taiwan large-scale seimic test", Struct. Saf., 10, 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(91)90011-W.
  2. Abrahamson, N.A., Schneider, J.F. and Step, J.C. (1991a), "Empirical spatial coherency functions for applications to soil-structure interaction analyses", Earthq. Spectra, 7, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585610.
  3. Amiri, G.G. and Bagheri, A. (2009), "Simulation of earthquake records using combination of wavelet analysis and non-stationary Kanai-Tajimi model", Struct. Eng. Mech., 33(2), 179-1961. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.33.2.179.
  4. Bi, K.M. and Hao, H. (2011), "Influence of irregular topography and random soil properties on coherency loss of spatial seismic ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40, 1045-1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1077.
  5. Bi, K.M. and Hao, H. (2012), "Influence of ground motion spatial variations and local soil conditions on the seismic responses of buried segmented pipelines", Struct. Eng. Mech., 44(5), 663-680. I: http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.44.5.663.
  6. Bilici, Y., Bayraktar, A. and Adanur, S. (2009), "Comparison of uniform and spatially varying ground motion effects on the stochastic response of fluid-structure interaction systems", Struct. Eng. Mech., 33(4), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.33.4.407.
  7. Boissieres, H.P. and Vanmarcke, E.H. (1995), "Estimation of lags for a seismograph array: wave propagation and composite correlation", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 14, 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(94)00026-D.
  8. Bolt, B.A., Loh, C.H., Penzien, J., Tsai, Y.B. and Yeh, Y.T. (1982), "Preliminary report on Smart 1. Strong motion array in Taiwan", Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. UCB/EERC87/13, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
  9. Boore, D.M. (2001), "Effect of baseline correlation on displacement and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 91, 1199-1211. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000703.
  10. Bozorgnia, Y. and Campbell, K.W. (2004), "The vertical to horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H vertical design spectra", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(2), 175-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350486
  11. Bradley, B.A. and Cubrinovski, M. (2011), "Near-source strong ground motions observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake", Bull. NZ. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 44(4), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.82.6.853.
  12. Chaouch, K.A., Tiliouine, B., Hammoutence, M., Sigbjoronsson, R. and Rupakhety, R. (2016), "Estimateing ground motion incoherence thought finite source simulation: a case study of 1980 EI-Aanam Earthquake", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 14, 1195-1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9867-x.
  13. Der Kiureghian, A. (1996), "A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25, 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<99::AID-EQE540>3.0.CO;2-C.
  14. Ding, H.P., Liu, Q.F., Jin, X. and Yuan, Y.F. (2004), "A coherency function model of ground motion at base rock corresponding to strike-slip fault", Earthq. Sci., 17(1), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191396.
  15. Feng, Q.M. and Hu, Y.X. (1981), "Spatial correlation model of ground motion", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 1, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-002-0001-5
  16. Fletcher, J.B., Baker, M., Spudich, P., Goldstein, P., Sims, J.D. and Hellweg, M. (1992), "The USGS Parkfield, California, dense seismograph array, UPSAR", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 82(2), 1041-1070.
  17. Gade, M. and Raghukanth, S.T.G. (2018), "Spatial variation of ground rotational motions in elastic half-space", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 107, 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.007.
  18. Hao, H., Oliveira, C.S. and Penzien, J. (1989), "Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data", Nucl. Eng. Des., 111(3), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(89)90241-0.
  19. Harichandran, R.S. and Vanmarcke, E.H. (1986), "Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time", J. Eng. Mech., 112, 154-174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:2(154).
  20. Hindy, A. and Novak, M. (1980), "Response of pipelines to random ground motion", J. Eng. Mech., 106, 339-360.
  21. Hu, L., Xu, Y.L. and Zheng, Y. (2012), "Condition simulation of spatially variable seismic ground motions based on evolutionary spectra", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41, 2125-2139. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2178.
  22. Jankowski, R. and Wilde, K. (2000), "A simple method of conditional random field simulation of ground motions for long structures", Eng. Struct., 22(5), 552-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00125-4.
  23. Jenkins, G.M. and Watts, D.G. (1969), "Spectral analysis and its applications", J. Am. Statist. Associat., 64(328), 174-175.
  24. Konakli, K. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2012), "Simulation of spatially varying ground motions including incoherence, wave-passage and differential site-response effects", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41, 495-513. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1141.
  25. Liao, S. and Li, J. (2002), "A stochastic approach to site-response component in seismic ground motion coherency mode", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 22, 813-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00103-3.
  26. Liao, S., Zerva, A. and Stephenson, W.R. (2007), "Seismic spatial coherency at site with irregular subsurface topography", Prob. Appl. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/40914(233)11.
  27. Liu, G.H., Lian, J.J., Liang, C. and Zhao, M. (2017), "An effective approach for simulating multi-support earthquake underground motions", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 15, 4635-4659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0153-3.
  28. Loh, C.H. and Lin, S.G. (1990), "Directionality and simulation in spatial variation of seismic waves", Eng. Struct., 12(2), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(90)90019-O.
  29. Lou, C.H. (1985), "Analysis of the spatial variation of seismic waves and ground movements from SMART-1 data", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 13, 561-581. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290130502.
  30. Luco, J.E. and Wong, H.L. (1986), "Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 14, 891-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290140606.
  31. Menke, M., Lerner-Lam, A.L., Dubendorff, B. and Pacheco, J. (1990), "Polarization and coherence of 5 to 30Hz seismic wave fields at a hard-rock site and their relevance to velocity heterogeneities in the crust", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 80, 430-449.
  32. Mohamed, A.S., Sunghyuk, G., Sung, G.C. and Dookie, K. (2015), "Seismic responses of base-isolated nuclear power plant structures considering spatially varying ground motions", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(1), 169-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.1.169.
  33. Novak, M. and Hindy, A. (1980), "Seismic response of buried pipelines", 3rd Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Montreal, Canada.
  34. O1iveira, C.S., Hao, H. and Penzien, J. (1991), "Ground motion modeling for multiple-input structural analysis", Struct. Saf., 10, 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(91)90007-V.
  35. Qu, T.J., Wang, J.J. and Wang, Q.X. (1996), "The utility model of spatial variation of ground motion power spectrum", Acta Seismol. Sinica, 18, 55-62.
  36. Saxena, V., Deodatis, G. and Shinozuka, M. (2000), "Effect of spatial variation of earthquake ground motion on the nonlinear dynamic responses of highway bridges", Proc. of 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
  37. Sayed, M.A., Go, S., Cho, S.G. and Kim, D. (2015), "Seismic responses of base-isolated nuclear power plant structures considering spatially varying ground motions", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(1), 169-188. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.1.169.
  38. Somerville, P.G., Irikura, K., Graves, R., Sawada, S., Kagawa, T. and Smith, N. (1999), "Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion", Seismol. Res. Lett., 70(1), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.70.1.59.
  39. Somerville, P.G., Mclaren, J.P. and Saikai C.K. (1988), "Site-specific estimation of spatial incoherence of strong ground motion", Proceedings Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II, Recent Advances in Ground-motion Evaluation, ASCE, Park City, Utab.
  40. Somerville, P.G., Mclaren, J.P., Sen, M.K. and Helmberger, D.V. (1991), "The influence of site conditions on the spatial incoherence of ground motions", Struct. Saf., 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(91)90003-R.
  41. Spudich, P. (1994), Recent Seismological Insights into the Spatial Variation of Earthquake Ground Motions, New Developments in Earthquake Ground Motion Estimation and Implications for Engineering Design Practice, ATC 35-1.
  42. Tian, L., Gai, X., Qu, B., Li, H.N. and Zhang, P. (2018), "Influence of spatial variation of ground motions on dynamic responses of supporting towers of overhead electricity transmission systems: An experimental study", Eng. Struct., 128, 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.010.
  43. Tonyali, Z., Ates, S. and Adanur, S. (2019), "Spatially variable effects on seismic response of the cable-stayed bridges considering local soil site conditions", Struct. Eng. Mech., 70(2), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.2.143.
  44. Wang, G.Q., Boore, D.M., Igel, H. and Zhou, X.Y. (2003), "Some observation on collocated and closely spaced strong ground motion records of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93, 674-693. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020045.
  45. Wang, G.Q., Tang, G.Q., Jackson, C.R., Zhou, X.Y. and Lin, Q.L. (2006), "Strong ground motions observed at the UPSAR during the 2003 M6.5 San Simeon and 2004 M6.0 Parkfield Earthquakes", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96(4B), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050802.
  46. Wu, Y.X., Gao, Y.F., Zhang, N. and Li, A.Y. (2016), "Simulation of spatially varying ground motions in V-shaped symmetric canyons", J. Earthq. Eng., 20(6), 992-1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1010049.
  47. Yang, Q.S. and Chen, Y.J. (2000), "Practical coherency model for spatially varying ground motions", Struct. Eng. Mech., 9(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.9.2.141.
  48. Yu, R.F., Yuan, M.Q. and Yu, Y.X. (2011), "Spatial coherency function of seismic ground motion based on UPSAR records", Appl. Mech. Mater., 90-93, 1586-1592. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.90-93.1586.
  49. Yu, R.F., Zhou, X.Y. and Yuan, M.Q. (2012), "Dynamic response analysis of generally damped linear system with repeated eigenvalues", Struct. Eng. Mech., 42(4), 449-469. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.4.449.
  50. Yurdakul, M. and Ates, S. (2018), "Stochastic responses of isolated bridge with triple concave friction pendulum bearing under spatially varying ground motion", Struct. Eng. Mech., 65(6), 771-784. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.65.6.771.
  51. Zerva, A. (2009), Spatial Variation of Seismic Ground Motions-Modeling and Engineering Applications, CRC Press, New York.
  52. Zerva, A. and Harada, T. (1997), "Effect of surface layer stochasticity on seismic ground motion coherency and strain estimations", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 16, 445-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00019-5.
  53. Zerva, A. and Zervas, V. (2002), "Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: An overview", Appl. Mech. Rev., 55(3), 271-297. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1458013.

피인용 문헌

  1. Fragility-based performance evaluation of mid-rise reinforced concrete frames in near field and far field earthquakes vol.76, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.76.6.751