References
- Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:159-70. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.105571
- Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:594-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.025
- Lund DI, Sandler PJ. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:104-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70282-3
- Morris DO, Illing HM, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II--The soft tissues. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:663-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/20.6.663
- Trenouth MJ. Cephalometric evaluation of the Twinblock appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:54-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70248-4
- Varlik SK, Gultan A, Tumer N. Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:128-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm121
- Bayram M, Kayipmaz S, Sezgin OS, Kucuk M. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:1812-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.070
- Yildirim E, Karacay S, Erkan M. Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2014;84:1018-25. https://doi.org/10.2319/112713-869.1
- Elfeky HY, Fayed MS, Alhammadi MS, Soliman SAZ, El Boghdadi DM. Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance. J Orofac Orthop 2018;79:245-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-018-0137-1
- Liu B, Wang Y, Song F, Liu M, Duan Y, Zhou L. [Cone-beam CT evaluation of the changes in the temporomandibular joint of patients with class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion before and after twin-block treatment]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2013;31:610-4. Chinese.
- Serbesis-Tsarudis C, Pancherz H. "Effective" TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment. Angle Orthod 2008;78:813-8. https://doi.org/10.2319/082707-391.1
- Koerich L, Weissheimer A, de Menezes LM, Lindauer SJ. Rapid 3D mandibular superimposition for growing patients. Angle Orthod 2017;87:473-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/072316-574.1
- Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:611-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.008
- Cevidanes LH, Heymann G, Cornelis MA, DeClerck HJ, Tulloch JF. Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:94-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.018
- Ruellas AC, Yatabe MS, Souki BQ, Benavides E, Nguyen T, Luiz RR, et al. 3D mandibular superimposition: comparison of regions of reference for voxelbased registration. PLoS One 2016;11:e0157625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157625
- Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:335-40. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.107009
- Tecco S, Saccucci M, Nucera R, Polimeni A, Pagnoni M, Cordasco G, et al. Condylar volume and surface in Caucasian young adult subjects. BMC Med Imaging 2010;10:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-10-28
- Kinzinger GS, Roth A, Gulden N, Bucker A, Diedrich PR. Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances on the condylefossa relationship in the temporomandibular joint: a magnetic resonance imaging study (Part I). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:339-46. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/53048233
- Ghafari J, Engel FE, Laster LL. Cephalometric superimposition on the cranial base: a review and a comparison of four methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:403-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90393-3
- Pancherz H. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1979;76:423-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(79)90227-6
- McNamara JA Jr, Hinton RJ, Hoffman DL. Histologic analysis of temporomandibular joint adaptation to protrusive function in young adult rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Am J Orthod 1982;82:288-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90463-8
- Ruf S, Baltromejus S, Pancherz H. Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod 2001;71:4-11.
- Sharma AK, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya BC. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2012;30:218-26. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.105014
- Sun L, Zhao J, Wang H, Pan Y, Wang L, Zhang WB. Mechanical stress promotes matrix synthesis of mandibular condylar cartilage via the RKIP-ERK pathway. J Mol Histol 2017;48:437-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10735-017-9741-4
- Atresh A, Cevidanes LHS, Yatabe M, Muniz L, Nguyen T, Larson B, et al. Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients with different vertical facial patterns treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;154:238-48.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.037
- Arici S, Akan H, Yakubov K, Arici N. Effects of fixed functional appliance treatment on the temporomandibular joint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:809-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.035
- Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE. Tomographic assessment of alterations of the temporomandibular joint after orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:3-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/14.1.3
- Wadhawan N, Kumar S, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Sharma R. Temporomandibular joint adaptations following two-phase therapy: an MRI study. Orthod Craniofac Res 2008;11:235-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00436.x
- Sarnat BG. Some methods of assessing postnatal craniofaciodental growth: a retrospective of personal research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:159-72. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0159_smoapc_2.3.co_2
- Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR Jr, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:369-75. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/17102411
- Gazzani F, Ruellas ACO, Faltin K, Franchi L, Cozza P, Bigliazzi R, et al. 3D comparison of mandibular response to functional appliances: Balters Bionator versus Sander Bite Jumping. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:2568235.
- Souki BQ, Vilefort PLC, Oliveira DD, Andrade I Jr, Ruellas AC, Yatabe MS, et al. Three-dimensional skeletal mandibular changes associated with Herbst appliance treatment. Orthod Craniofac Res 2017;20:111-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12154
- Ivorra-Carbonell L, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcis C. Impact of functional mandibular advancement appliances on the temporomandibular joint - a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2016;21:e565-72.
- Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, Tollaro I. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:502-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70287-7
- Burhan AS, Nawaya FR. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:330-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju052
- Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 5th ed. India: Elsevier; 2012.
- Voudouris JC, Kuftinec MM. Improved clinical use of Twin-block and Herbst as a result of radiating viscoelastic tissue forces on the condyle and fossa in treatment and long-term retention: growth relativity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:247-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70231-9
Cited by
- A long-term longitudinal study of the osteoarthritic changes to the temporomandibular joint evaluated using a novel three-dimensional superimposition method vol.11, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88940-y