References
- Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
- DeBoer, G. E. (2006). Historical perspective on inquiry teaching in schools. In L. Flick & N. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Nature of Science: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education (pp. 17-35). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
- Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730620411
- Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 860-877. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1036
- Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
- Jeong, J. I., & Jang, N. H. (2018), Comparative analysis of the description of osmosis in Korean and American high school chemistry textbooks. Teacher Education Research, 57(4), 539-548. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.57.4.201812.539
- Jeong, J.-S. (2006). Role of hypothesizing abduction in high school students' generation of hypotheses about root-pressure. The Korean Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 405-414.
- Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
- Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02300500
- Joung, Y. J., & Song, J. (2006). The features of the hypotheses generated by pre-service elementary teachers using the form of Peirce's abduction. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(2), 126-140.
- Kind, P. M., Kind, V., Hofstein, A., & Wilson, J. (2011). Peer argumentation in the school science laboratory-Exploring effects of task features. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2527-2558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.550952
- Kim, D. H. (2017). The effects on particulate concept formation based on abductive reasoning model for elementary science class. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.1.0025
- Kim, H., Kin, Y., Kim, D., & Wee, S. M. (2018). The case study of strategies for abductive reasoning in the process of solving earth science inquiry questions for middle school students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(15), 799-820.
- Kim, J. H., Kim, J. W., Park, C. K., & Paik, S. H. (2006). Development of particle-level computer assisted instruction materials for the 'solution' chapter in high school chemistry textbook and analysis of the educational effects. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 50(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2006.50.2.163
- Kim, Y., & Kim. Y. (2008). Newton's scientific problem finding and abductive reasoning in his discovery of the light and color theory. Sae Mulli, 53(3), 162-170.
- Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
- Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar. S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by designTM into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2
- LaBanca, F. (2008). Impact of problem finding on the quality of authentic open inquiry science research projects. Doctoral Thesis. Western Connecticut State University. UMI Number: 3411366.
- Lawson, A. E. (2000). How do humans acquire knowledge? and what does that imply about the nature of knowledge? Science & Education, 9, 577-598. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008756715517
- Lee, S. K., Choi, C. I., Lee, G., Shin, M. K., & Song, H. (2013). Exploring scientific reasoning in elementary science classroom discourses. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.181
- Lee, S. Y., Kim, S. H., & Paik, S. H. (2010). A case study of chemistry major pre-service teacher's understanding about the properties of dilute solutions and perception on teacher education curriculum. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 54(6), 787-798. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2010.54.6.787
- Lim, O. K., & Kim, H. N. (2018). Scientific reasoning differences in science writing of elementary school students by grades. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(6), 839-851. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.6.839
- Lim, S. C., Kim, J. H., & Jeong, J. W. (2013). Analysis of the scientific reasoning ability of science-gifted 2nd middle school students in open-Inquiry activities. Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2013.37.2.323
- Lipton, P. (2004) Inference to the Best Explanation (2nd ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
- Maeng, S. H., Park, M., Lee, J. A., & Kim, C. J. (2007). A case study of middle school students' abductive inference during a geological field excursion. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(9), 818-831.
- Ministry of Education(MOE) (2015). 2015 revised science curriculum. Ministry of Education 2015-74 [issue 9].
- National Research Council(NRC) (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
- Noh, T., Yun, J., Kang, H., & Kang, S. (2006). A comparison of scientists' and students' responses to discrepant event and alternative hypothesis in the conceptual change processes from the phlogiston theory to the oxygen theory. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(7), 798-804.
- Oh, P. S. (2016). Roles of models in abductive reasoning: A schematization through theoretical and empirical studies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 551-516. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0551
- Oh, P. S. (2017a). The roles and importance of critical evidence (CE) and critical resource models (CRMs) in abductive reasoning for earth scientific problem solving. Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 426-446. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2017.41.3.426
- Oh, P. S. (2017b). An interpretation of modeling-based elementary science lessons from a perspective of distributed cognition. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 36(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.1.016
- Park, J. (2000). Analysis of students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypothesis-Focused on the definition and the characteristics of scientific hypothesis -. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(4), 667-679.
- Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Ablex Pub. Corp.
- Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. (2000). Towards a taxonomy of problems used in problem-based learning curricula. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 11(2/3), 57-72.
- Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. Brandwein (Eds.), The Teaching of Science (pp. 1-104). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Schwartz, R. S., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Authentic scientific inquiry as context for teaching nature of science. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science. Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education (pp. 331-355). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Shim, H., & Ryu, S. (2018). Pre service chemistry teachers' understanding of science practices during open-inquiry chemistry laboratory activities. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 62(1), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2018.62.1.52
- Tolentino, L., Birchfield, D., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., JohnsonGlenberg, M., Kelliher, A., & Martinez, C. (2009). Teaching and learning in the mixed-reality science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 501-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9166-2
- VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995-1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006009
- Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
- Yun, H., & Kim, H.-B. (2018). Exploring science high school students' epistemic goals, epistemic considerations and complexity of reasoning in open inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(4), 541-533. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.4.541
- Yoon, H. G., & Pak, S. J. (2000). The change of middle school students' motivation for investigation through the extended science investigations. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(1), 137-154.