References
- Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096-1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153
- Baik, E. J., & Song, E. Y. (2009). A study on children's conceptions of the objects' floating-and-Sinking phenomenon. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 14(3), 155-176.
- Butts, D. P., Hofman, H. M., & Anderson, M. (1993). Is hands-on experience enough? A study of young children's views of sinking and floating objects. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 5(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03170644
- Chi, M. T. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1
- Chi, M. T., Slotta, J. D., & De Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
- Chittleborough, G., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Correct interpretation of chemical diagrams requires transforming from one level of representation to another. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 463-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9059-4
- Dentici, O. A., Grossi, M. G., Borghi, L., De Ambrosis, A., & Massara, C. I. (1984). Understanding floating: A study of children aged between six and eight years. European Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528840060305
- Galilei, G. (1968). The Little Balance. McGraw-Hill.
- Hadjiachilleos, S., Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2013). The impact of cognitive and affective aspects of cognitive conflict on learners' conceptual change about floating and sinking. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(2), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.811074
- Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Moller, K., & Stern, E. (2006). Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students' understanding of floating and sinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.307
- Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2005). Examining young children's conceptual change process in floating and sinking from a social constructivist perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 259-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000243736
- Howe, C. J. (2016). Conceptual structure in childhood and adolescence: The case of everyday physics. London: Routledge.
- Kim, S. K., Kim, S. W., & Paik. S. H. (2017). The effect of explanation in conjunction with gravity and density on students' alternative conceptions for floating and sinking phenomena. Journal of the Korea Chemistry Society, 61(3), 112-121.
- Kim, S. K., Park, C. Y., Choi, H., & Paik, S. H. (2017). An analysis of chemistry textbooks' and teachers' conceptions on Bronsted-Lowry acid-base. Journal of the Korea Chemistry Society, 61(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2017.61.2.65
- Kim, S. K., Park, C. Y., Choi, H., & Paik. S. H. (2018). Evaluation of stated models for the floating and sinking phenomena in the chemical domain. Journal of the Korea Chemistry Society, 62(3), 226-234.
- Kim, S., Choi, H., & Paik, S. H. (2019). Using a systems thinking approach and a scratch computer program to improve students' understanding of the Bronsted-Lowry acid-base model. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2926-2936. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00210
- Kim, S., & Paik, S. H. (in press). Archimedes' balance approach applied to buoyant force. The Physics Teacher.
- Kim, Y. Y., & Kim, J. N. (2012). Analysis of the middle school students' conceptions about buoyancy. Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2012.36.2.369
- Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualizations in Science Education (pp. 121-146). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Kwon, D. H., & Kown, S. G. (2000). Elementary school students conceptions of buoyance related with cognitive levels. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 19(1), 131-143.
- Lee, H. C., & Lee, S. J. (2000). An investigation of elementary school teachers' conceptions on buoyancy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 19(1), 145-156.
- Lee, S. H., & Paik, S. H. (2013). Suggestion for science Education through the analysis of Archimedes' creative problem solving process. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.030
- Leuchter, M., Saalbach, H., & Hardy, I. (2014). Designing science learning in the first years of schooling. An intervention study with sequenced learning material on the topic of 'floating and sinking'. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1751-1771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.878482
- Lynch, M. (2006). The production of scientific images: vision and re-vision in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science. In L Pauwels (Ed.), Visual cultures of science: rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication (pp. 26-40). Lebanon, NH: Darthmouth College Press.
- National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academies Press.
- Paik, S. H. (2015). Understanding the relationship among Arrhenius, Bronsted-lowry, and Lewis theories. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1484-1489. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500891w
- Paik, S., Song, G., Kim, S., & Ha, M. (2017). Developing a four-level learning progression and assessment for the concept of buoyancy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13, 4965-4986.
- Piaget (2005). The child's conception of physical causality. Oxon: Routledge.
- Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1974). The child's construction of physical quantities. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Radovanovic, J., & Slisko, J. (2013). Applying a predict-observe-explain sequence in teaching of buoyant force. Physics Education, 48(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/48/1/28
- Rhee, J. S., & Lee, B. W. (2010). Analysis of elementary and secondary students' conceptions about buoyant force. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 60(2), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.60.93
- Skoumios, M. (2009). The Effect of sociocognitive conflict on students' dialogic argumentation about floating and sinking. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(4), 381-399.
- Spyrtou, A., Zoupidis, A., & Kariotoglou, P. (2008). The design and development of an ICT-enhanced module concerning density as a property of materials applied in floating-sinking phenomena. Ιn: CP Constantinou & N. Papadouris. In Girep International Conference, Physics Curriculum Design, Development and Validation, Selected Papers (pp. 391-407).
- Unal, S.,;Costu, B.; Problematic issue for students: Does it sink or float. In Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2005, 6, 1.
- Yin, Y. (2012). Applying scientific principles to resolve student misconceptions. Science scope, 35(8), 48.
- Yin, Y., Tomita, M. K., & Shavelson, R. J. (2008). Diagnosing and dealing with student misconceptions: Floating and sinking. Science scope, 31(8), 34.
- Yoon, H. G. (2018). Development and validation of visual representation competence taxonomy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.2.161